if tokers ruled the world (imagine that)

blazin256 said:

id trust a high surgeon. hell id toke up with him before my surgery.

Click to expand...

poplars said:

blah blah blah blah bullshit.

I produced 2 articles supporting what I said (look back and read), why can't you produce yours?

because you're sounding like you're full of shit on this one. making me look for the article YOU are trying to prove something about to me? fuck that, you do your own work.

Click to expand...

poplars said:

normally I'd go grab the studies, but at the moment I'm trying to relax. maybe later I'll come back and edit this post and post my evidence.

as far as the doc impaired comments, I agree for the most part, though I also think it's possible for a doctor to love his job more on cannabis, but that's just another thought. I'm not saying in any way it's a good thing, I was only talking about the strict scientific possibility of someone being CAPABLE of doing such things. not saying it's gonna be a better quality than the person who is sober, but I bet it could be equal to.



and technically bro, if HU210 causes neurogenesis, so will THC.

I don't think it's even legal for them to do tests on THC or not, but I'm still looking. pretty sure they HAVE to use synthetic cannabinoids.

here's one that seems to test THC and CBD

http://biosignaling.com/content/8/1/12/abstract/
and another
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/121667879/abstract
and fyi, I don't get my info from high times.

also, you better post a link to that study saying there was NO neurogenesis in natural cannabinoids.

Click to expand...

poplars said:

and technically bro, if HU210 causes neurogenesis, so will THC...also, you better post a link to that study saying there was NO neurogenesis in natural cannabinoids/QUOTE]


you do realize that the first link you posted stated "CBD did not impair learning but increased adult neurogenesis, whereas THC reduced learning without affecting adult neurogenesis", right? sounds like you are making a lot of assumptions and not even reading your own evidence. so are you defending thc or cbd? that study did not conclude whether or not the two substances mitigated each other's effects and is essentially inconclusive as to whether actually consuming cannabis will produce those effects. as for the second link, it only pertained to individuals with alzheimer's, which in the study was described as "associated with neuroinflammation, excitotoxicity and oxidative stress" the study was done on people who are known to have "altered cannabinoid systems" which is enough to raise the question of whether these effects would be observed in a "normal" brain. and NONE of these studies prove in any way that consuming cannabis will not cause impairment. what was your original argument again?

Click to expand...

Airwave said:

Nothing would ever get done.

Click to expand...

Total Head said:

poplars said:

and technically bro, if HU210 causes neurogenesis, so will THC...also, you better post a link to that study saying there was NO neurogenesis in natural cannabinoids/QUOTE]


you do realize that the first link you posted stated "CBD did not impair learning but increased adult neurogenesis, whereas THC reduced learning without affecting adult neurogenesis", right? sounds like you are making a lot of assumptions and not even reading your own evidence. so are you defending thc or cbd? that study did not conclude whether or not the two substances mitigated each other's effects and is essentially inconclusive as to whether actually consuming cannabis will produce those effects. as for the second link, it only pertained to individuals with alzheimer's, which in the study was described as "associated with neuroinflammation, excitotoxicity and oxidative stress" the study was done on people who are known to have "altered cannabinoid systems" which is enough to raise the question of whether these effects would be observed in a "normal" brain. and NONE of these studies prove in any way that consuming cannabis will not cause impairment. what was your original argument again?

Click to expand...

you refuse to even see his point.... doesnt matter how right you are in your little area you are preaching from, its not what was being debated, and now you two are just bitching.

-closed-

Click to expand...