Well that's pretty stupid.
I voted for Hillary. The problem is you're a child that wants to blame somebody else because you dropped your ice cream.
The fact is, there is nobody to blame but Hillary Clinton. She had a decent chance of beating Bernie without all the underhanded dealing and cheating. She didn't want to risk it and cheated.
She got caught doing it.
That's going to upset some people, but it isn't the fault of Bernie supporters. Hillary still won the popular vote. The VAST majority of us who were actually looking at Bernie still voted for Hillary even after the fact just to stop Trump.
The voters weren't the problem. Hillary won. It was the electoral college that let Trump in.
That happened for only one reason: several of the electorates were upset with Hillary cheating, so they either didn't vote at all or voted for Trump to teach the DNC a lesson.
Lesson learned apparently, as the entire DNC was pretty much gutted.
All of that was brought about by one person and one person only: Hillary Clinton. Nobody else has a single thing to do with it.
So grow up. If not, change your diaper and get a fresh binky. You'll be OK.
Ooops Several leaps of faith here. Such as these statements:
She didn't want to risk it and cheated.
She got caught doing it.
I've gone through those e-mails looking for ties between Clinton and the crap that was in those e-mails. You believe Clinton was involved but there was not a single message that objectively establishes what you believe.
DWS, yes. DNC, yes. People connected to Clinton's campaign, yes. Clinton herself? No.
Then look at the content. It was back office chatter by no-names that discussed a smear campaign in W VA against Bernie. It never became reality. Just musings.
DWS did snipe at a new organization about some content. When asked about it, the news organization said it wasn't anything of note, that they get the same stuff from all campaigns, including Bernie's every day.
A leaked debate question. I recall that the question was obvious and unsurprising.
Was this stuff wrong? Absolutely. Should there be a shake-up by the DNC afterward? Yep, and there was.
Did this affect the outcome of the primary? Remember: e-mail chatter by nobodies that amounted to nothing, a complaint at a news org. and a leaked but obvious debate question. Come on man. You are grasping at straws if you believe that.
The leaks were powerful propaganda in that they gave the appearance of back office cheating. And so, I'm not doubting the effect the Russian spy effort to hack the election was a factor in Trump's win. I'm also in agreement that even the appearance of ethics violations should be a fire-able offense. Not just because I'm disappointed that the DNC in fact was biased against Bernie but also because dumb actions like the ones that led up to the DNC wiki-leaks scandal hurt the Clinton campaign.
But, there is no objective evidence that Clinton cheated and was caught. That is your belief and you are entitled to it. As I am entitled to point out that your belief is false based upon evidence.
