cannapharm
Well-Known Member
Ill put up some literature later on today.....
infinity bud 50% thc
- Thread starter neil420
- Start date
cannapharm
Well-Known Member
That makes sense I think...Im pretty sure its based on tested samplei think it is the percent per the tested sample, which is usually a bud. yes, that BUD is 20% THC. but that bud doesn't represent the whole plant. that bud DOES look like it was in a snow storm. that is why it tested at 20%. now if you ground the WHOLE plant up, of course you would have a lower reading. you don't smoke the whole plant though, so why test the whole plant?
the BUD is 20% TH
i could be wrong.
Brick Top
New Member
THC levels are the percentage of THC in relation to all known cannabinoids and what is tested is only what is found in trichome heads. THC and other cannabinoids are only created in trichome heads. Only slight trace amounts are found in plant matter, meaning leaves, branches, stems roots, etc.
tip top toker
Well-Known Member
still reading, and gettinga bit confused, but it seems that the plant mamtter, i.e bud, is put through a hardcore scientific version of honey oil extraction, the solution ocntaining the THC removed from the material is then magiced into figures 
http://cannabis-science.com/papers/GCFIDofCannabis.pdf
hopefully sopmeone else will have a better understanding of that. i've sent an email or two asiing of there is a short on line answer
http://cannabis-science.com/papers/GCFIDofCannabis.pdf
hopefully sopmeone else will have a better understanding of that. i've sent an email or two asiing of there is a short on line answer
tingpoon
Well-Known Member
i think a 90% THC strain would cost a ton of money,
Platinum Bread Man
Active Member
^^^
clearly it IS impossible to achieve 90% or 50% for that matter.
clearly it IS impossible to achieve 90% or 50% for that matter.
Anonymouse
Active Member
50% THC, shit who needs shrooms or acid if you get that high 
Obvously it's bullshit, the best hightimes buds are estimated in the 20's
Obvously it's bullshit, the best hightimes buds are estimated in the 20's
igothydrotoneverywhere
Well-Known Member
i think it is the percent per the tested sample, which is usually a bud. yes, that BUD is 20% THC. but that bud doesn't represent the whole plant. that bud DOES look like it was in a snow storm. that is why it tested at 20%. now if you ground the WHOLE plant up, of course you would have a lower reading. you don't smoke the whole plant though, so why test the whole plant?
the BUD is 20% THC.
i could be wrong.
YES, it is. The DRIED bud is 22% thc matter. But thats only after you remove the ~90% of the plant which is water.
If you have a 7 gram satchel of white widow at 22% thc, then 7g x .22 = 1.54 g of pure thc. and you started with 70 grams of wet white widow... 1.54g/70g= 2.2% TOTAL THC BY WEIGHT.
you could make it more precise if you add the trim and bubble hash
wiseguy316
Well-Known Member
even if the genetics were capable of producing a plant to 50% thc, getting it there is another story. Any claims of thc content are under the most ideal conditions. And we all know that doesnt happen.
andrewgc420
Member
This is the good shit , i have it and would not trade it for anything except their infinite ephoria.
budlover909
Active Member
last i heard thc% was THC vs everything else you get when you smoke it, not plant weight.
could not imagine a 1lb plant being 20% thc. thats like 2 ounces of pure stone. no way.
could not imagine a 1lb plant being 20% thc. thats like 2 ounces of pure stone. no way.
Sr. Verde
Well-Known Member
I wonder if they will ever genetically modify cannabis to produce a fuck tonne of THC. Of course the laws would need to loosen up quite a bit before that type of research happens
I don't see why scientists couldnt, as they already modify other plants.
Of course the plants genetics [probably] wouldn't be stable, so breeding and such probably wouldn't work out so good. But hey it would be a cool science experiment to see if you could get like 45% THC
I don't see why scientists couldnt, as they already modify other plants.
Of course the plants genetics [probably] wouldn't be stable, so breeding and such probably wouldn't work out so good. But hey it would be a cool science experiment to see if you could get like 45% THC
DonTesla
Well-Known Member
Hahaha. wouldn't that be lovely. Tish snow. interesting talk boys. i wonder if it doesn't matter so much if THC is in the plant or out so much (altho that is very interesting itself) vs say how THIS test actually works.. i.e. what does it actually test.. one may wonder how can it test something that is not "in it" … answer to that of course is holographic principle of nature itself but still, dam interested in this convo. i swore i saw 50% tho thats what mind fucked me mon.. dipped in hash oil tho. triiiicky, lol. just when i was getting comfortable with the lack of gimmicks in organics.. haha. anyway, how are the stores and dispensaries in your states, for organic stores vs hydrostrores, and for organic strains vs non organic strains at the dispensaries.. here its about 4% organic, 96% commercial bottled products at the stores, and in the dispensaries, I'm glad to say they got almost 50% organic in BC disps right now vs like 10-20% when i was living there.
DonTesla
Well-Known Member
and when i say organic stores, i mean stores that sell all the organic amendments a brotha or sista needs, or most of them.. a non frustrating place, lets say.. it can sell normal commercial too.. I'm just wondering how the organic landscape is out there… looking to live in the states half the time.. thinking Colorado would be best so far (know a nice girl there, lol) but need more input, thanks bredgren, respect! (and gyals 
)
)
st0wandgrow
Well-Known Member
I've never gotten a straight answer on this. Even the lab techs at the testing facilities give me different answers. It seems if the total THC were calculated by the weight of the sample, then it would be easy to manipulate the numbers by just drying the fuck out of the sample before you have it tested.
I dunno