kansas anti-gay segregation bill..

racerboy71

racerboy71

bud bootlegger
new bill likely to be passed by the house is going to allow anti gay actions to fall under the guise of religious freedom... weren't we just talking about this with the cake shop in oregon?? crazy ...
anyhoos, according to the new bill, gays may not be allowed access to hospitals, cops may not have to serve and protect gays, as well as being turned down by public businesses..
the bill is originally written for gay couples, but of course the loose language of the bill means that it could also be applied to single gay men and women, so long as the person working / waiting, serving and protecting them, feels that being gay is against their religious beliefs..

http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2014/02/13/kansas_anti_gay_segregation_bill_is_an_abomination.html


personally, i can't even believe a bill like this would stand a chance of passing, but from what i've read, said it should fly right through.. :(
 
Pinworm

Pinworm

Well-Known Member
racerboy71 said:
new bill likely to be passed by the house is going to allow anti gay actions to fall under the guise of religious freedom... weren't we just talking about this with the cake shop in oregon?? crazy ...
anyhoos, according to the new bill, gays may not be allowed access to hospitals, cops may not have to serve and protect gays, as well as being turned down by public businesses..
the bill is originally written for gay couples, but of course the loose language of the bill means that it could also be applied to single gay men and women, so long as the person working / waiting, serving and protecting them, feels that being gay is against their religious beliefs..

http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2014/02/13/kansas_anti_gay_segregation_bill_is_an_abomination.html


personally, i can't even believe a bill like this would stand a chance of passing, but from what i've read, said it should fly right through.. :(
Click to expand...
Holyshit..................
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
racerboy71 said:
new bill likely to be passed by the house is going to allow anti gay actions to fall under the guise of religious freedom... weren't we just talking about this with the cake shop in oregon?? crazy ...
anyhoos, according to the new bill, gays may not be allowed access to hospitals, cops may not have to serve and protect gays, as well as being turned down by public businesses..
the bill is originally written for gay couples, but of course the loose language of the bill means that it could also be applied to single gay men and women, so long as the person working / waiting, serving and protecting them, feels that being gay is against their religious beliefs..

http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2014/02/13/kansas_anti_gay_segregation_bill_is_an_abomination.html


personally, i can't even believe a bill like this would stand a chance of passing, but from what i've read, said it should fly right through.. :(
Click to expand...
It's Kansas
WTF do you expect?
 
Pinworm

Pinworm

Well-Known Member
racerboy71 said:
lol, i'm talking to my gay friend, and that's exactly what she just said to me. still, this is crazy, kansas or alabama, or any where, this is the 21st century, no?
Click to expand...
20 years behind the curve. For sure. I'm a little butt hurt (pun intended) about this, man. I love that we've been making a shit load of progress on the front, but, when I think about how fucked things were just 5 years ago, I'm not surprised that we still have a superlong way to go to educate the idiots. Fucking shame.
 
racerboy71

racerboy71

bud bootlegger
ChesusRice said:
Lawrence is probably the most Un-Gayest University town in the world.
Click to expand...
i'll have to take your word for it.. i was in kansas once, i was a kid, maybe a year or two old.. all i remember were buffalo, and now i think of it, none of them looked gay either..
 
foreverflyhi

foreverflyhi

Well-Known Member
It wont pass, if it did thrn kansas and those other states will get over run by hurds of lgbt. Im sure that will cure their homophobia
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
racerboy71 said:
i'll have to take your word for it.. i was in kansas once, i was a kid, maybe a year or two old.. all i remember were buffalo, and now i think of it, none of them looked gay either..
Click to expand...
Not much of a college town. Lived there for 4 months on a construction crew. Lived next to a bar that had no bathrooms. The guys would piss on the bar side of our house and the girls would piss on the other side. Wish we had cell phone cameras back then. It was funny as shit seeing droves of drunk chicks taking a piss and getting surprised when we popped out looking at them from the second floor window

Bar was called bullwinkles
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
While it is stupid to not serve a person based on their sexual orientation. The idea that a private business owner must associate with somebody he or she doesn't want to is disturbing.

If a person truly owns something like real estate property they would determine the rules. If others determine the rules for them, the ownership has been changed.

No, I am not anti-gay. I am pro freedom of association, which means all people should be able to associate with others and be left alone as long as the owner of the place where they are associating permits it. Allowing a single entity such as government to determine who can or cannot associate is giving a bunch of dickwads the power to determine what people will do. Freedom of association should only require that ALL parties involved and only those parties, are cool with it.

When people use force to make persons associate with others they prefer not to, there is a problem. Individuals should be left alone to associate with those that wish to associate with them. After all it was the chameleon government that used to have laws against gays associating with other gays or blacks and whites intermarrying. Don't look for solutions from the same people that brought the problem....
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
While it is stupid to not serve a person based on their sexual orientation. The idea that a private business owner must associate with somebody he or she doesn't want to is disturbing.

If a person truly owns something like real estate property they would determine the rules. If others determine the rules for them, the ownership has been changed.

No, I am not anti-gay. I am pro freedom of association, which means all people should be able to associate with others and be left alone as long as the owner of the place where they are associating permits it. Allowing a single entity such as government to determine who can or cannot associate is giving a bunch of dickwads the power to determine what people will do. Freedom of association should only require that ALL parties involved and only those parties, are cool with it.

When people use force to make persons associate with others they prefer not to, there is a problem. Individuals should be left alone to associate with those that wish to associate with them. After all it was the chameleon government that used to have laws against gays associating with other gays or blacks and whites intermarrying. Don't look for solutions from the same people that brought the problem....
Click to expand...
So you saying the same thing Ron Paul did. It's ok to tell someone not to wash or drop off clothes in my place of business due to the color of skin or their sexual preference? WTF.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
So you saying the same thing Ron Paul did. It's ok to tell someone not to wash or drop off clothes in my place of business due to the color of skin or their sexual preference? WTF.
Click to expand...
it's OK, the racists seem to have come out to play today, and rob roy is no exception. he thinks blacks demand "special rights" and calls the president a mulatto all the time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top