Kiss your privacy goodbye
- Thread starter ttystikk
- Start date
tangerinegreen555
Well-Known Member
Do you have that pic hanging in your living room with your NAMBLA collection?Toby or not Toby that is the question...slave.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
No, but I did get to thank Alex Haley I enjoyed the book he worked on with Malcolm X.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
did you tell him you don't think he should have the right to sit at the same lunch counter as a white, pedo?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
No, but had it come up I would have told him he had the right to control his own property and his own body, but not the property or body of other people.
It's ironic that you malign me, given that your position disrespects individual freedom , just like slavery does.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you would have told him he had to go eat at another lunch counter, segregationist bitch.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
I wouldn't make rules concerning other persons property, since I don't have any right to.
Could you tell me which person does?
Sir Napsalot
Well-Known Member
Chevy "blue flame" 6
pergamum362
Well-Known Member
..and as our government involvment in education grows...those numbers will continue to plummet. Seems we were much better before we had a federal department of education...we also didnt have a student loan bubble the size of the housing bubble.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Grandpapy
Well-Known Member
The Public arm of Govt. involvement or the Corp. arm of Govt. involvement?
https://www.teachforamerica.org/about-us/media-resources/news-releases/exxonmobil-and-teach-america—south-louisiana-team-train
The Corp arm would have you believe that intensity is the subject.
The Public arm would teach you that intensity is a unit of measurement such as when you slam your head with a light bulb, one could then convey the amount of (obvious) intensity to others.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Worse yet, the idiocy here is self reinforcing. The ignorant quite literally band together to shout down the educated.
This applies to far more than growing here; tribalism in spite of the facts is rampant across every topic in the forum.
It's an excellent indicator of a dying civilisation.
Sir Napsalot
Well-Known Member
"Light bulb" is a pretty broad term there, Dr. Science
A high-intensity UV BULB will fuck your eyes up pronto
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
he's going to reply with some dumb and facile face saving way. Just watch. The narcissist can't stand being made into a fool.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
LOL
He said something nice to you.
Is this where you call it "honey"? Or perhaps, sweetie?
GrowLightResearch
Well-Known Member
I kind of knew that, thanks anyhow for that piece of information. Truth is seeing anyone can set the rules here, I can stare are any UV light bulb and it will not damage my eyes. Yes, yes I can. 1000W UVA, stare at it all day. No problem, no eye damage.
Just don't turn it on. I never said what kind of light bulb. I never said the light bulb would even be turned on. Oh so you assumed it would be turned on? Why would you assume UV? If I'm the one staring at a light bulb I sure the fuck ain't gonna pick a UV bulb.
So just what was your point in pointing that out? Just to day something? Anything? Just to see your words in electronic ink? Do you figure if you keep saying things you may at some time sound intelligent? Not yet, keep trying.
Sincerely,
Dr. Science MS
Mad Scientist (mad as in crazy, not angry)
PS the guy was still wrong. HPS is not superior to LED because of brightness. This all started because I questioned brightness and intensity when comparing HPS to another light source.
I still say the photons coming out of an HPS bulb are the same as photons that come out of an LED and they travel at the same speed, have the same penetration. The only difference I can think of is the cost of the photons. Then there HPS photons cost a shit load of money compared to an LED photon. If you want the same photomorphogenesis with from an LED as an HPS, then use the same spectrum. Unless you are ashamed of your small dick, then hide that fact by using a big ass election guzzling HPS. Or generate 75% of photons with a 4000K light source and 25% deep red and you will have pretty much the same spectrum as an HPS. Don't use that cool white, blue shit, light. Plants don't like too many blue photons for photosynthesis, too much energy per photon. Oh yeah, brightness is not an SI unit. So when telling me an HPS and an LED or different becasue of the brightness, please be more specific. I prefer PPFD irradiance when when talking about light for plants. Ever wonder why there is a D in PPFD? Density is not even a surface geometry, it's volumetric. Maybe PPFB? Flux Brightness. Why not?
GrowLightResearch
Well-Known Member
GrowLightResearch
Well-Known Member
It wasn't that witty the first time you said that. Still isn't. And I would never want to remove words from your already limited vocabulary. You should just get back to coloring with your bright colored crayons.
GrowLightResearch
Well-Known Member
Yep. Wasted space, but I was running simulations and had time to kill. I come to look at the pictures. That's how I came across this thread, looking for the pictures of your vertical grow.
Do you know of anyone that has tried sandwiching the plants between glass? I was thinking if possible that would be a way to improve uniformity without having to adjust the distance between the light and plant. I have found that about 4"-5" is the ideal distance between the light and canopy when seven 4' strips are used in a 4x4 grow area. An inch more or less is not a good. Turns out increasing distance does not improve uniformity between 4" and 14". It does improve above 14" but is not as uniform as at 4". And the amount of electric needed at 4" is about 1% of that need at 1 meter.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Oh good lord, these two are going to save our dying civilization. Thank goodness.