Misguided Greedy bunch ....

jafro daweedhound

Well-Known Member
Great idea - real community leaders. Outstanding way to show your place in the industry....

What's that.... no ones figured out how to measure impairment from cannabinoids .. ???

Well if there is no way of telling if someone is impaired or not, and any signs of THC could be showing signs of past use from weeks ago, then what are they talking about. I would hope that the LPs would be able to explain to MADD that their witch hunt is flawed. Perhaps if the public was told the truth for once we all might get somewhere...

Don't get high and go driving, know your limit...
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
"Impaired" is a medical condition, not some arbitrary number. You can be impaired by alcohol or drugs, or you can be impaired due to lack of sleep or a mental or physical disability, or even age. It's how the impairment affects your ability to drive that should be the focus. An all-day every-day smoker like myself won't feel or display the same impairment as a occasional toker at the same level of thc. If the spirit of the law is to keep our roads safe, they need to shift their focus from worrying about how much of whatever substance we have in our bodies and target dangerous and aggressive drivers that are causing the accidents. Any stats out there on how many accidents are caused by someone using cannabis vs. those caused by age (young and old), or even prescription drugs? This is just a witch hunt to continue the demonetization of cannabis. Some neanderthals just can't wrap their heads around 21'st century thinking. They lost the war on pot and are just taking a few parting shots.
 

JungleStrikeGuy

Well-Known Member
Seems pretty transparent as virtue-signalling from Tweed, given the current state of 'impaired' when it comes to driving and cannabis.
 
Top