I don't challenge anything you've stated here accept "What ruins this reverie", (did you go to Boise state or UC Davis?lol
, but do you really disagree that this technology was 'still just a twinkle in dad's eye' as they say, dad being H et al?
OK at risk of another thread bomb from the dr., here I go again lol all apologies in advance just as before, but to me trying to wriggle out of H already trying to work in this direction even if only entertaining theories of this kind of technology is about as plausible as saying the US gov could have never foreseen planes, highjacked or otherwise crashing into the trade towers as was their standard PR line at the time.
Hitler's embracing of eugenics was not a cause of action,, it was a RESULT of his desperate need for a scapegoat. the eugenicist's claptrap provided him with "evidence" of the inferiority of jews slavs poles negroes and all manner of people who's great sin was being Not German Enough. even his "aryan" bullshit was simply a slapdash re-imagining of history for his own purposes. describing the nordic peoples as aryan is not only idiotic abundantly obviously flawed. if he werent Der Fuhrer he would have been laughed out of town. Hitler was also an ardent believer in astrology, esoteric mysticism, the psuedo-philosophies of Marx and Engles, and the trenchant insights of Benito Mussolini none of which are scientific either, yet all have been put up as such by adherents, proponents and touts many times over the years. if in some distant almost unimaginably madcap future some chucklehead actually draws a tenuous statistical link between the seasonal period in which one is born, and some percieved character trait in adults, would this be "Proof" of the veracity of the noble art of astrology? in that distant time i will still call bullshit even if Der Fuhrer thinks it's a grand idea.
describing eugenics or eugenicists as anything scientific is way off the mark. most eugenics was based on fundamentally flawed assumptions, like average cranial capacity of a social group being a measure of intelligence, as well as the brilliant observations obtained through the rigorous science of phrenology, and the powerful theories of insightful thinkers like De Gobineau, and drunken racist rednecks wearing gravy stained klan robes. as much as i despise the feraful and misinformed hippies who believe that eating GMO corn will transform them into hideous mutations or trigger allergies from 5 genus away, trying to intimate that genetic research is the fruit of the poison tree with it's roots in hitler's bowel movements is just despicable.
when you wind up declaring GMO's are bad because------------> (6 degrees of separation to hitler)---------------> therefore anyone who doesnt hate GMO's is in league with the Nazis... you have already lost the argument.
you keep grasping for new reasons why your little bill is a good idea
for stoners, it will keep Monsanto from making GMO dope to poison all the little potheads.
for anarcho-occupier nutbars,, it puts corporations in their place
for econauts it preserves nature's balance
for religious wackadoos it protects Intelligent Design's designs\
for socialists it stigmatizes profit
for communists it "protects the commons" while expanding "the commons" to include ephemeral ideas and the natural world
for the anti-hitler brigade you conflate genetic science with eugenicists and drop the the H-Bomb like Harry Truman.
im curious what you will include to sway the anti-gun lobby and the free abortion on demand crowd.
cn
