No guns for medical MJ users

Illinois Enema Bandit

Well-Known Member
what is the difference between a progressive democrat, a regressive democrat, and a liberal democrat?
I'll take that question for $500 Alex.

#1 progressive Democrat lunatic

#2 regressive Democrat lunatic looking for those good old days where they whipped black Americans & kept em segrated
for their own good


#3 a true liberal Democrat,we all know what the Democratic Party thought of this liberal

now answer my questions,why did the .Democratic Party create Americas worst terrorist group and unleash it against fellow Americans,you can say it ya know :lol:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I'll take that question for $500 Alex.

#1 progressive Democrat lunatic

#2 regressive Democrat lunatic looking for those good old days where they whipped black Americans & kept em segrated
for their own good


#3 a true liberal Democrat,we all know what the Democratic Party thought of this liberal

now answer my questions,why did the .Democratic Party create Americas worst terrorist group and unleash it against fellow Americans,you can say it ya know :lol:
jfk was a progressive according to every history book i have ever seen.

robert byrd was saluted by the progressive policy institute for his work in advancing and progressing civil rights.

http://www.progressivepolicy.org/blog/rip-robert-byrd/

so clearly, you have your facts quite wrong, but that is not surprising. after all, you claimed that the president who let cannabis legalization proceed was secretly against it. so we're used to you being wrong.

your question has been asked and answered. conservative southern democrats started the KKK, then they left the party and became dixiecrats, then the dixiecrats became republicans. this is apparent looking at maps of electoral college results.

what you have not explained is why so many KKK and white supremacist leaders are enthusiastically supporting trump and even running for office as republicans.

if you could answer that instead of selling meth to children, that would be great.
 

Illinois Enema Bandit

Well-Known Member
jfk was a progressive according to every history book i have ever seen.
.

progressive at early 60's standards,the definition of what's " progressive " has changed a dozen times since JFK into the raving lunacy of Trigglypuff being the new face of progressive liberalism,u created it so why not embrace it?

your question has been asked and answered. conservative southern democrats started the KKK
I'll take that partial answer and store it away 4 future use :hump:

robert byrd was saluted by the progressive policy institute for his work in advancing and progressing civil rights.
Seig Heil mien Furher!!!
quote below from bing

Democrat United States Senator Robert C. Byrd was a recruiter for the Klan while in his 20s and 30s, rising to the title of Kleagle and Exalted Cyclops of his local chapter. After leaving the group, Byrd spoke in favor of the Klan during his early political career. Though he claimed to have left the organization in 1943, Byrd wrote a letter in 1946 to the group's Imperial Wizard stating "The Klan is needed today as never before, and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia." Byrd attempted to explain or defend his former membership in the Klan in his 1958 U.S. Senate campaign when he was 41 years old.[1]
Despite being the only Senator to vote against both African American U.S. Supreme Court nominees (liberal Thurgood Marshall and conservative Clarence Thomas) and filibustering the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Byrd later said joining the Klan was his "greatest mistake." The NAACP gave him a 100% rating on their issues during the 108th Congress.[2] However, in a 2001 incident Byrd repeatedly used the phrase "white niggers" on a national television broadcast.[3]

so clearly, you have your facts quite wrong
my facts are wrong lol? which part of Nazi scum did I get wrong,the part about your hero KKK cyclops Robert Byrd bing Hillary's mentor ? or the part about the Democratic party being built on racism & slavery ?

if you could answer that instead of selling meth to children, that would be great.
I need that meth money to buy some new teeth for a friend:lol:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
immigration is the duty of each states governor,who's charged with making sure local politicians follow all laws so no go on the derp derp bro,not good enough
nope. immigration is the duty of the federal government, not state governors. just ask (((jan brewer))) now that SB1070 was shot down in a conservative leaning supreme court.

and i'm not your bro.

DERP!
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
nope. immigration is the duty of the federal government, not state governors. just ask (((jan brewer))) now that SB1070 was shot down in a conservative leaning supreme court.

and i'm not your bro.

DERP!
If the Trump wall is so wrong, why did Bush and Obama put up all that new fencing ? It`s there, Want a pic. It`s not a wall but a fence does what buckster ?

So in total, Bush did some work, Obama did some work, and Trump wants to improve on that work. And the problem is ????????? What ?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Patrick Kennedy, and Diane Feinstein are blocking cannabis legalization. The drug war is a bipartisan affair.

Smoke pot, lose your civil rights. You progs are for it.
what the fuck is an outed white supremacist cop, who does not smoke or grow, but who does wish federal prison on growers, doing on a fucking pot website?

seriously george, go back to stormfront. make a thread about your gofundme page so that you can keep your pathetic little "defend the roost" event going.

ya know, since you are at retirement age but can't afford a mere $800 to keep it going.





 

Indacouch

Well-Known Member
That argument is so stupid. "If we outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns". Cool. Then we can just arrest or kill anyone with a gun because then we will know they are a crazy fuck outlaw and we don't have to worry about shooting someone who was legally armed. That just makes things easier. Also, you may be able to kill a couple people with a bolt action, but do you really think you could rack up 20, 30, 40 kills before you were stopped if you had a sawed off and a bolt action? Or do you think it might bring the kill count down to around the same level as if you had to use a knife or other non-gun weapon? I don't think anyone's committed a mass killing with a bolt action since Charles Whitman (And even he had at least one Semi-Auto in addition to the bold action)
You've obviously never been around guns of any sort ....a shotgun can kill multiple people with one shot and the rite load and it only takes one death to be a massacre IMO that's bad enough ......but I'm not going to argue the point with someone who knows nothing about guns to begin with and obviously is anti gun from the beginning ....I agree there's no reason for a civilian to have a full auto gun and I like guns ....but even at that people make decisions not the gun ....and you could call my argument dumb all you want especially when you have no valid reason to do so .....don't try to talk about stuff you have no clue about ....a shotgun is easily a worst nightmare in the wrong hands ....oh and call any gun store and ask them what's the number one most bought and recommended weapon for home defense that would be the shotgun do your homework before you post that a shotgun or a bolt action are nicer guns than the rest .....you make no sense Lol
 

Ace Yonder

Well-Known Member
You've obviously never been around guns of any sort ....a shotgun can kill multiple people with one shot and the rite load and it only takes one death to be a massacre IMO that's bad enough ......but I'm not going to argue the point with someone who knows nothing about guns to begin with and obviously is anti gun from the beginning ....I agree there's no reason for a civilian to have a full auto gun and I like guns ....but even at that people make decisions not the gun ....and you could call my argument dumb all you want especially when you have no valid reason to do so .....don't try to talk about stuff you have no clue about ....a shotgun is easily a worst nightmare in the wrong hands ....oh and call any gun store and ask them what's the number one most bought and recommended weapon for home defense that would be the shotgun do your homework before you post that a shotgun or a bolt action are nicer guns than the rest .....you make no sense Lol
And yet pistols are responsible for the majority of all gun deaths, and semi auto/full auto rifles are the weapons of choice in nearly all mass shootings. The stats don't back up the reality you would like to believe.
 

Indacouch

Well-Known Member
And yet pistols are responsible for the majority of all gun deaths, and semi auto/full auto rifles are the weapons of choice in nearly all mass shootings. The stats don't back up the reality you would like to believe.
Oh but shotguns and bolt actions are nice guns rite it's okay for everybody to have one of those like you mentioned before .....cause there not dangerous and nobody could ever cause a massacre with either of those ....you just don't make no sense in your very first comment and there's sadly tons of stories of people killing other people with these two kinds of guns your acting like are not as dangerous as all the others ......And I know the stats and reality more than you do by far and that's neither here not there and I could care less about that because I'm not arguing the fact that some guns are better for fucktards to commit crimes with ...what I'm saying is your original post makes no sense ....shotguns especially are rite up there with all the others you speak of .....oh and some of the most powerful accurate deadliest long distance shooting guns in the world are bolt action ...that's just a fun fact for your nicer gun theory
 

Ace Yonder

Well-Known Member
Oh but shotguns and bolt actions are nice guns rite it's okay for everybody to have one of those like you mentioned before .....cause there not dangerous and nobody could ever cause a massacre with either of those ....you just don't make no sense in your very first comment and there's sadly tons of stories of people killing other people with these two kinds of guns your acting like are not as dangerous as all the others ......And I know the stats and reality more than you do by far and that's neither here not there and I could care less about that because I'm not arguing the fact that some guns are better for fucktards to commit crimes with ...what I'm saying is your original post makes no sense ....shotguns especially are rite up there with all the others you speak of .....oh and some of the most powerful accurate deadliest long distance shooting guns in the world are bolt action ...that's just a fun fact for your nicer gun theory
And yet, say, Canada, where people commonly own the weapons of mass destruction formerly known as shotguns and long guns, but far fewer people own handguns, has less than half our per capita murder rate, and nowhere near our rate of mass shootings. Why hasn't there been a mass shooting in Australia since their gun restrictions were put in place?
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
You've obviously never been around guns of any sort ....a shotgun can kill multiple people with one shot and the rite load and it only takes one death to be a massacre IMO that's bad enough ......but I'm not going to argue the point with someone who knows nothing about guns to begin with and obviously is anti gun from the beginning ....I agree there's no reason for a civilian to have a full auto gun and I like guns ....but even at that people make decisions not the gun ....and you could call my argument dumb all you want especially when you have no valid reason to do so .....don't try to talk about stuff you have no clue about ....a shotgun is easily a worst nightmare in the wrong hands ....oh and call any gun store and ask them what's the number one most bought and recommended weapon for home defense that would be the shotgun do your homework before you post that a shotgun or a bolt action are nicer guns than the rest .....you make no sense Lol

This reminds me of the fletchettes that were banned in Vietnam.
 

Illinois Enema Bandit

Well-Known Member
If the Trump wall is so wrong, why did Bush and Obama put up all that new fencing ? It`s there, Want a pic. It`s not a wall but a fence does what buckster ?

So in total, Bush did some work, Obama did some work, and Trump wants to improve on that work. And the problem is ????????? What ?
Let's not forget about Hillary wanting to deport millions of illegal immigrants and build a wall or fence on the Mexican border .

Hillary Clinton in her own words describing how she,as a senator,voted numerous times to spend money to " build a barrier " to keep out illegal immigrants .


How's that make you feel bucky ? now you know KK Klinton wants a wall & deport illegals but will say or do anything to get elected ,depending on who she's pandering too you zombie .
 
Top