Poll: Which Political Philosophy or Party Do you agree with the most?

Only a max of 10 options so I have to keep it broad. I am curious of everyones political leanings here. I am left libertarian overall if all of my views are part of the discussion, for historical political philosophy I agree the most with mutalist views, but depending on the topic, If it is a very specific topic I can often be classified as a center libertarian or even a center or left anarchist(market anarchy).

But in a utopian world, anarchy right. No one or government would stop you. This would assume no need for stopping you, because everyone does things ethically. Meaning no one does actions which are known to cheat or deprive others. What should be others for your own hedomy.

I don't agree but agree to disagree, although I really do like market anarchism/anarco capitalism. I know you said in a utopian world and your having fun but to join in your fun I think that Right Anarchy means very little social liberties or civil rights in essence so it would have to be a utopia to live up to that dream you speak of. It exactly what the Democrats try to label as libertarianism. It would mean opposing factions or gangs like sudan or something in combination with forced idealism(from gangs or corporations as opposed to government, it would be like a mafia paradise, corruption and crime central) in Reality it is not practical. It would be cool and fun as a man and an entrepreneur but...yea...what about disabled people, women, and children who don't think it would be 'super badass'...ill stick with paintball guns lol

Should of put an Option for Facist
CannaSylvan is defending Hitler a lot these days

deprave said:

I don't agree but agree to disagree, although I really do like market anarchism/anarco capitalism. I know you said in a utopian world and your having fun but to join in your fun I think that Right Anarchy means very little social liberties or civil rights in essence so it would have to be a utopia to live up to that dream you speak of. It exactly what the Democrats try to label as libertarianism. It would mean opposing factions or gangs like sudan or something in combination with forced idealism(from gangs or corporations as opposed to government, it would be like a mafia paradise, corruption and crime central) in Reality it is not practical. It would be cool and fun as a man and an entrepreneur but...yea...what about disabled people, women, and children who don't think it would be 'super badass'...ill stick with paintball guns lol

Click to expand...

So whats the Difference between Libertarian and Anarchy?

Ron Paul, 2012!

None of the above

dukeanthony said:

So whats the Difference between Libertarian and Anarchy?

Click to expand...

anarchy = no government, libertarian = some government

Not trying to troll ... genuinely curious ... i thought that "Libertarian" and "left" were mutually exclusive. How not? Link to educate me? thanks. cn

cannabineer said:

Not trying to troll ... genuinely curious ... i thought that "Libertarian" and "left" were mutually exclusive. How not? Link to educate me? thanks. cn

Click to expand...

not true at all, but a common misconception among Americans today, Libertarianism was actually born out of the left in classic liberalism. There have been many many libertarian left philosophers and philosophies, essentially libertarian left is anti-corporate and anti-state. Libertarian can be left or right.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-libertarianism




Id argue that most Americans are probably left libertarians, to be honest its probably the most common way of thinking in our society. A classic form of left libertarianism is Mutalism....hence the name..someone who is pretty much mutual on unions with anti-government and anti-corporate leanings and favors the people and personal liberties heavily. I am sure you can think of a few Americans like that

[video=youtube;qmf7ksraGSY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmf7ksraGSY[/video]

Here is Ron Paul
Which is where this was going anyways

cannabineer said:

Not trying to troll ... genuinely curious ... i thought that "Libertarian" and "left" were mutually exclusive. How not? Link to educate me? thanks. cn

Click to expand...

For economics and social policies (education, health, jobs, market, choice etc..) I am a Democratic Socialist.

For personal freedoms I am Libertarian Left.

For your poll I need to vote 2x and then one will only be close (Liberal Left (little too far to the right in its present form but closest on poll), and Libertarian Left)

Due to how these are usually perceived I cannot divorce the two "labels" and use only one.

If you have never done this, every decision you make is exaggerated but I try.
http://www.nationstates.net/nation=lots_of_lids

dukeanthony said:

Should of put an Option for Facist
CannaSylvan is defending Hitler a lot these days

Click to expand...

Let me try to explain this to your feeble hateful mind.

I'm probably more liberal and socialist than you. I like fairness. People should help eachother out. No one should judge someone on looks, country of origin, culture, skin pigmentation, language, gender or religion. Where I differ from you is I feel no one should be forced, bullied or persuaded into showing those outward actions and feelings. Otherwise it's fake. So if someone wants to be an idiot and worship Hitler, who am I to stop them? But if others try to stop him, I will defend even fools. It's like the holocaust poem which ends, "Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me."
Would you be offended if a crazy Nazi lover skinhead saved you from drowning? If you're known as a Nazi hater, why would their kind save you? If you hate no one and think everyone deserves the same freedoms you do, hope is even the Nazi lover will think twice, even just once.

As long as their views, even though different and vile to you, don't harm others, leave them alone. If they do harm to others, punish them the same as anyone else who did the same wrong. It's not right to punish differently for hate crimes. The person is beat up or dead just the same.

I think theists, personally, are the least intelligent of our specie. I feel they should think for themselves and stop making excuses. But as long as they don't hurt anyone, I treat them the same as a non-theist. In my mind I think they should wake up. You have to come to that conclusion on your own like I did, otherwise again it's fake. I can't have my perfect world. I have to suck it up and accept it.

I personally don't believe racism exists. It can't exist if race is a lie. I already told you why in other posts.

If I can accept others, why can't you? Acceptance doesn't mean condoning or converting them. It means learning to live amongst them, or if you can't, leave and ignore them.

My bet is you'll do some red herring and deflect my arguements; ending your post with you're racist and/or respectfully shut the fuck up. Wise up, or you'll forever be duketroll.

Canna Sylvan said:

Would you be offended if a crazy Nazi lover skinhead saved you from drowning? If you're known as a Nazi hater, why would their kind save you? If you hate no one and think everyone deserves the same freedoms you do, hope is even the Nazi lover will think twice, even just once.

.

Click to expand...

And what Makes you think A nazi Lover SKinhead would Save a drowning Minority?
Probably the one who threw him in the water to begin with

So again I respectfully ask that you shove a large Vegetable of your Choice Up your Racist ass
But Not an eggplant though
Eggplant in Italian is a slur on blacks
Unless you Like that sort of thing

dukeanthony said:

And what Makes you think A nazi Lover SKinhead would Save a drowning Minority?
Probably the one who threw him in the water to begin with

So again I respectfully ask that you shove a large Vegetable of your Choice Up your Racist ass
But Not an eggplant though
Eggplant in Italian is a slur on blacks
Unless you Like that sort of thing

Click to expand...

Canna Sylvan said:

My bet is you'll do some red herring and deflect my arguements; ending your post with you're racist and/or respectfully shut the fuck up. Wise up, or you'll forever be duketroll.

Click to expand...

Called it!

Dr Ron Paul
Fuck those groups and partys- For better or worse it's the Constitution and Declaration od independance and Bill of rights till the end

RisenHIGH said:

Called it!

Click to expand...

I tried

dukeanthony said:

And what Makes you think A nazi Lover SKinhead would Save a drowning Minority?
Probably the one who threw him in the water to begin with

Click to expand...

You respond with the skinhead probably threw him in to begin with? That there's racist(bigotry). I'd never say something like that. How do you know the skinhead isn't from a family of hate? So he would feel sad for a dying minority. Or maybe he has a fucked up life and needs someone to blame in this fucked up world and is all talk? In that case he'd save the person too. But if you had taunted him before calling him evil, that won't change his mind and only give more reason to hate you. So if he heard before you didn't hate him, even though he said he hated you, maybe your cries for help will get to his humanity and one time treat you like a human. It might even last a lifetime afterwards. Your hate towards hate solves nothing, duketroll.

Canna Sylvan said:

You respond with the skinhead probably threw him in to begin with? That there's racist(bigotry). I'd never say something like that. How do you know the skinhead isn't from a family of hate? So he would feel sad for a dying minority. Or maybe he has a fucked up life and needs someone to blame in this fucked up world and is all talk? In that case he'd save the person too. But if you had taunted him before calling him evil, that won't change his mind and only give more reason to hate you. So if he heard before you didn't hate him, even though he said he hated you, maybe your cries for help will get to his humanity and one time treat you like a human. It might even last a lifetime afterwards. Your hate towards hate solves nothing, duketroll.

Click to expand...

And maybe he was a SHARP...

Canna Sylvan said:

You respond with the skinhead probably threw him in to begin with? That there's racist(bigotry). I'd never say something like that. How do you know the skinhead isn't from a family of hate? So he would feel sad for a dying minority. Or maybe he has a fucked up life and needs someone to blame in this fucked up world and is all talk? In that case he'd save the person too. But if you had taunted him before calling him evil, that won't change his mind and only give more reason to hate you. So if he heard before you didn't hate him, even though he said he hated you, maybe your cries for help will get to his humanity and one time treat you like a human. It might even last a lifetime afterwards. Your hate towards hate solves nothing, duketroll.

Click to expand...

As I have stated Numerous times
You are always defending Bigotry and racism
Always