Here's the scenario.. Swim was in a friend's house with a gym bag containing 2 oz of pot, a scale, clothes, and mail with his name on it. There was a search warrant for the house because the tenant was caught stealing from the local Walmart. During the search a dog hit on the gym bag. My thinking is the mail in the bag does not prove the pot belonged to swim just because they were both in the same bag. Swim is being offered a plea deal for simple possession. Do you guys think a jury would find swim guilty beyond a reasonable doubt based on the mail being in the gym bag containing the pot?