Removal of Confederate symbols enrages Nazi whites

visajoe1

Well-Known Member
Hey isn't this a little "nationalist" though? Seriously, I'm glad the csa lost the civil war but there's a secession movement in Cali due to trump. Would this movement be treasonous to you?
there is a few similarities between the 1860 election and 2016. the reaction from the left if nearly identical, even to the secession threats. the difference is they followed through in the 1860's which started the civil war. the dems were fighting to keep slavery then. now, they are fighting to keep illegal immigrants and criminals free in our society, keep minorities in fear of everything, and give them all as much money as they can through as many social programs/laws as possible. all without any accountability or personal responsibility. its always someone else's fault..
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
there is a few similarities between the 1860 election and 2016. the reaction from the left if nearly identical, even to the secession threats. the difference is they followed through in the 1860's which started the civil war. the dems were fighting to keep slavery then. now, they are fighting to keep illegal immigrants and criminals free in our society, keep minorities in fear of everything, and give them all as much money as they can through as many social programs/laws as possible. all without any accountability or personal responsibility. its always someone else's fault..
the liberal left won the 1860 election you monumental retard.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
there is a few similarities between the 1860 election and 2016. the reaction from the left if nearly identical, even to the secession threats. the difference is they followed through in the 1860's which started the civil war. the dems were fighting to keep slavery then. now, they are fighting to keep illegal immigrants and criminals free in our society, keep minorities in fear of everything, and give them all as much money as they can through as many social programs/laws as possible. all without any accountability or personal responsibility. its always someone else's fault..
Revisionist history much, wingnut?
 

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
there is a few similarities between the 1860 election and 2016. the reaction from the left if nearly identical, even to the secession threats. the difference is they followed through in the 1860's which started the civil war. the dems were fighting to keep slavery then. now, they are fighting to keep illegal immigrants and criminals free in our society, keep minorities in fear of everything, and give them all as much money as they can through as many social programs/laws as possible. all without any accountability or personal responsibility. its always someone else's fault..
Jumping over $1mil for a shiny penny.
Commerce is moving your social programs/law, comrade.
Corps have no party loyalty.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Jumping over $1mil for a shiny penny.
Commerce is moving your social programs/law, comrade.
Corps have no party loyalty.
He's blathering on about slavery when the banks and major corporations are skimming billions off our economy in cheap subsidies, free loans and outright graft.

He's standing at the bus terminal while the corporate jets scream overhead.
 

DiogenesTheWiser

Well-Known Member
So why did Lincoln want lee to lead the union army again and what was the only reason lee did not actually lead the union? Do you not know?
I know the reason, and Lincoln didn't want Lee to lead the United States Army. Rather, he wanted Lee to lead the Army of the Potomac--the army that Lincoln was putting together at the beginning of the war. The head of all United States ground military forces at the beginning of the conflict was Henry Halleck. And he remained in that position for much of the war. Lee was never intended to replace Halleck.

None of this has anything to do with the wave of southern monument building that took place some 30-50 years after the conflict had ended. Let me put that in bold so you'll understand you're bringing up something that doesn't matter on this thread. We call that a non sequitur.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
I know the reason, and Lincoln didn't want Lee to lead the United States Army. Rather, he wanted Lee to lead the Army of the Potomac--the army that Lincoln was putting together at the beginning of the war. The head of all United States ground military forces at the beginning of the conflict was Henry Halleck. And he remained in that position for much of the war. Lee was never intended to replace Halleck.
He was asked to lead troops against his home state of Virginia and that was his only source of conflict in fighting for the Union.

None of this has anything to do with the wave of southern monument building that took place some 30-50 years after the conflict had ended.
Let me put that in bold so you'll understand you're bringing up something that doesn't matter on this thread. We call that a non sequitur.
It might have something to do with the monument of Lee that was just removed that was dedicated in 1884. See that's 19 years later. OK, have a good one.
 

DiogenesTheWiser

Well-Known Member
He was asked to lead troops against his home state of Virginia and that was his only source of conflict in fighting for the Union.


It might have something to do with the monument of Lee that was just removed that was dedicated in 1884. See that's 19 years later. OK, have a good one.
Ok, so what does it have to do with a monument dedicated to Lee some 14 years after the old man died?
 

DiogenesTheWiser

Well-Known Member
LOL! So what museum do you suppose they will put stone mountain in?
How is Stone Mountain history? What would one learn about the history of the Confederacy by gazing at Stone Mountain? It was made long after the Confederacy choked and failed to establish its independence, and it does nothing to explain why these southerners rebelled against the U.S. government.

To find history, one needs to read documents, like for example, the complete records of the Confederacy. You can get this in bound copies through interlibrary loan. Archives are better history than carvings made into stone blocks.

you pro-Confederacy nazis will never understand that because very few of you read.
 

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
Chains.jpg
Location, location, location. I supposes it's the curvature of the earth that keeps the most significant
part of this Statue from view So. of the Mason Dixon line.
Out of sight out of mind.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
How is Stone Mountain history? What would one learn about the history of the Confederacy by gazing at Stone Mountain? It was made long after the Confederacy choked and failed to establish its independence, and it does nothing to explain why these southerners rebelled against the U.S. government.

To find history, one needs to read documents, like for example, the complete records of the Confederacy. You can get this in bound copies through interlibrary loan. Archives are better history than carvings made into stone blocks.

you pro-Confederacy nazis will never understand that because very few of you read.
There's a laser show. A sculpture or a picture is not a detailed account of history? What an epic epiphany for you.

I go to new York and see a statue of promethius....maybe that peaks my curiosity to read up. That's usually how exhibits work.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
There's a laser show. A sculpture or a picture is not a detailed account of history? What an epic epiphany for you.

I go to new York and see a statue of promethius....maybe that peaks my curiosity to read up. That's usually how exhibits work.
i can see how glad you are that the CSA lost by how much whining you do over the fact that the CSA lost.
 

DiogenesTheWiser

Well-Known Member
There's a laser show. A sculpture or a picture is not a detailed account of history? What an epic epiphany for you.

I go to new York and see a statue of promethius....maybe that peaks my curiosity to read up. That's usually how exhibits work.
Why not try an archive? The reading material produced by people from the past will all be there. If it takes a rave to get you interested in something, perhaps history is not for you.
 
Top