She's Baaaaack!
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
The video was posted an hour ago
I'm 100Xs more progressive than you. In one breath, it's "Bernie's policies are too far left, they're not palatable for middle-America! You have to be reasonable and compromise with DINOs like Joe Manchin!" and "MRA! MYSOGYNEE! REDPILL!" in the next..
So you tell me, which is it smart guy? You need to pick one and stick with it otherwise you just look confused and inconsistent
Sessions is AG because if the strategy by Hillary Clinton and the DNC you supported. Maybe don't support corrupt incompetence next time if you would like to avoid someone like Trump or Sessions.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Is he your type?Cute like Palpatine
Actually, you are not very progressive. Retrograde is the best description of your politics.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
5 days old.
you're a "men's rights activist". LOL
i never said that, i explained to your immature crybaby ass why they voted for some cabinet nominees.
you're a hopeless misogynist. you are scared of women.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
OP still missing the whole 54/46 thing.
I'd he spent as much time on facts as he does asking for pics of assholes duct-taped open he'd realise his continued opposition of Clinton is defacto support for Trump.
I'd he spent as much time on facts as he does asking for pics of assholes duct-taped open he'd realise his continued opposition of Clinton is defacto support for Trump.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Not at all, hence the reference to Palpatine
I support:
-Universal Healthcare
-Universal College
-Raising the minimum wage to a living wage and indexing it with inflation
-Increasing taxes on the wealthy to provide programs for the poor
-Regulating the financial industry to ensure investment banking and commercial banking are separate (reinstating Glass-Steagall) and enacting a 28th amendment that eliminates Citizens United, McCutcheon v. FEC, First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, and Buckley v. Valeo
-Investing in domestic infrastructure programs
-Investing in public education
-Eliminating corporate welfare
-Equal rights for women, LGBTQ, and minorities
-Strong environmental regulations and immediate and aggressive action to curb anthropogenic climate change
-Universal background checks to buy a firearm
-Whistleblowers who expose government corruption
-Closing illegal offshore prisons
-Ending all overseas conflicts we're currently taking part of
-Ending funding terrorist governments like Saudi Arabia and Israel
-The UN
-Smart free trade deals that help average citizens, not just corporations
-A total end to the war on drugs and a comprehensive rehabilitation program for those affected by addiction
I oppose:
-"Religious liberty" laws that discriminate against LGBTQ people
-Teaching "intelligent design" in the science class
-Bigotry, prejudice, racism, and discrimination in every form
-Increases in spending on national "defense" and nation building
-Lower taxes on the rich, meaning higher taxes on the poor and middle-class
-Devestments in education
-"Safe spaces" in every form, including on college campuses as well as Trump's cabinet
-A ban on Muslims entering the country
-Overturning Roe v. Wade and a woman's right to choose
-Deregulating the banks and financial industry (fucking idiots!)
-Moderate Democrats who pretend they're progressive
-Corporate, establishment Democrats who pay lip service to but never accomplish goals that help their constituents
-DINOs who vote with Trump more than the rest of their own goddamn party
So which part of that is "Retrograde"?
The Humanist Report
Right, I support the rights of men. The distinction being I'm an activist who supports men's rights, just like I'm an activist who supports women's rights... Or LGBTQs rights, or minorities rights.. In other words, I'm a humanist.
Your implication being that I'm someone who supports men's right OVER the rights of others. I'd even reach to call myself a feminist if you use the original definition;
You know..
Instead of..
One group wants actual equal rights, the other group uses the guise of "equal rights" to see men suffer for the way women have been treated by men throughout human history
You would rather have a Democratic politician who votes with Trump more than 70% of the time than take a chance at electing an actual progressive in a state Sanders won against Clinton by a wide margin based on your belief that, hey, 70% is still better than 100%!...
Except the flaw in your argument is obvious; DINOs like Manchin and McCaskill hurt Dem constituents as well as prospects for future wins within the party because people are not as stupid as you think and they can see right through that bullshit.
It's not surprising you would employ the same tactics your failed candidate employed, hey, if you can paint Sanders as a misogynist, I guess that's the end of the argument to people like you? But this is where you fail. When I ask you to present examples of my misogyny..
So hey, ya got any?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you poor thing. how do you even cope?
lol
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
I'd just don't care