Tea party favorite Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts exposed as a farce

trishmybiscuits said:

Carne Seca, has nothing to do with the subject matter of this thread whatsoever. For instance, what does pointing out that Brown didn't grow up with the wrong personality have to do with Oprah Winfrey? What does pointing out that having a lot of step fathers isn't automatically a big deal have to do with Oprah Winfrey? The piece is about dismantling claims Brown made about his childhood you numbskull. You need to try reading it again. That is if you even read it at all and if you have the intellectual capacity to even understand it. What's your IQ?

Click to expand...

You so silly.

I havent read the link, I just wanted to point out the he just got caught lying about the Bin Laden corpse picture.

‘Let me assure you that he is dead, that bin Laden is dead, I have seen the photos and, in fact, we’ve received the briefings and we’ll continue to get the briefings.’’
Complete , total utter bullshit.

Senators were not shown the photos during a closed-door hearing this week held for members of the Armed Services Committee and the Select Committee on Intelligence, according to an official briefed on the meeting who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the meeting was private.

Link to the full story here: http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2011/05/mass_democrats_1.html

Kinda made me chuckle to see the other Teabag freshman from my area get caught lying about the same thing.

UncleBuck, I'm flattered that you're so obsessed with me that you would dwell on something that I said in another thread a while back. The reason why you keep bringing it up in this thread is becuase you can't dispute anything in the piece that this thread is based on.

I've tried to refrain from commenting on your attempts to dredge up something that has no bearing on the subject matter of this thread, figuring you'd eventually get an intelligence but obviously that isn't going to happen anytime soon. So let's make a fool out of you once and for all.

Mexico gained its freedom in 1821. It might not have had the same form of government it has today, but either way it was still a basket case. Now, granted, basket case can be open to interpretation, however, nitpicking and dwelling on something as ridiculous as that just results in you puking up your mentality for all to see.

Please stay on the subject matter: http://www.unintimidatedpress.com/brown.htm

trishmybiscuits said:

UncleBuck, I'm flattered that you're so obsessed with me that you would dwell on something that I said in another thread a while back. The reason why you keep bringing it up in this thread is becuase you can't dispute anything in the piece that this thread is based on.

I've tried to refrain from commenting on your attempts to dredge up something that has no bearing on the subject matter of this thread, figuring you'd eventually get an intelligence but obviously that isn't going to happen anytime soon. So let's make a fool out of you once and for all.

Mexico gained its freedom in 1821. It might not have had the same form of government it has today, but either way it was still a basket case. Now, granted, basket case can be open to interpretation, however, nitpicking and dwelling on something as ridiculous as that just results in you puking up your mentality for all to see.

Please stay on the subject matter: http://www.unintimidatedpress.com/brown.htm

Click to expand...

i think a damning indictment of your intelligence is relevant to this thread or any other you start.

BendBrewer, it is possible he fell out of favor with the tea party since he was elected, but still, thanks for the comment. It's refreshing to hear from someone with an IQ every now and then instead of the mindless idiots who don't have the intellectual capacity to understand what the hell it is we're discussing here nor what in the hell thread they're even in.

UncleBuck said:

i think a damning indictment of your intelligence is relevant to this thread or any other you start.

Click to expand...

Which is exactly why I don't bother to address his asinine posts anymore. It's a waste of time and brain cells. If he doesn't have a legitimate response he resorts to personal attacks. Just pat him on the head and have the nanny change his diaper.

trishmybiscuits said:

BendBrewer, it is possible he fell out of favor with the tea party since he was elected, but still, thanks for the comment. It's refreshing to hear from someone with an IQ every now and then instead of the mindless idiots who don't have the intellectual capacity to understand what the hell it is we're discussing here nor what in the hell thread they're even in.

Click to expand...

i like turtles.

I do have to work on my reading skills though.

Cheers!

Did anybody run out and buy Scott Brown's book?

trishmybiscuits said:

It's refreshing to hear from someone with an IQ every now and then instead of the mindless idiots who don't have the intellectual capacity to understand what the hell it is we're discussing here nor what in the hell thread they're even in.

Click to expand...

LOL welcome to a sight populated by stoned growers, if you want serious political discussion that doesnt go off topic you are in the wrong place......

"Did anybody run out and buy Scott Brown's book?"

NoDrama, I haven't. But I would recommend that anyone who does weigh it against the points raised in the article.

ink the world, it is unfortunate, but at least they let you post a thread like this in this forum. I know sites where they wouldn't even let you post a thread with this subject matter.

If there's people in the U.S. Senate who don't even know the difference between a bad childhood and a pampered, bowl-of-cherries, Cinderella baby one, I think the American people should be aware of that fact.

Heh, if Scott brown had a pampered bowl of cherries cinderella baby childhood, mine was WAYYYYY better than his was. Nobody molested me, except the hot neighbor girl, and I wouldn't really call it molestation, most would call it a blow job.

I often wonder when I hear people bash the tea party movement if they even understand it, or if their opinion comes from mainstream media propaganda or just fear of such drastic change. Here is what the tea party really is:

The Tea Party is an American populist[1][2][3] political movement which emerged largely as a result of Ron Paul 2008 primary campaign,[4][unreliable source?] which is generally recognized as conservative and libertarian,[5][6] and has sponsored protests and supported political candidates since 2009.[7][8][9] It endorses reduced government spending,[10][11] opposition to taxation in varying degrees,[11] reduction of the national debt and federal budget deficit,[10] and adherence to an originalist interpretation of the United States Constitution.[12]
The name "Tea Party" is a reference to the Boston Tea Party, a protest by colonists who objected to a British tax on tea in 1773 and demonstrated by dumping British tea taken from docked ships into the harbor.[13] Some commentators have referred to the Tea in "Tea Party" as the bacronym "Taxed Enough Already".[14][15]



I'm not a part of any party myself, not republican or democrat or libertarian or tea party, but these are the people who seem to have the best philosophy lately and what most closely matches what our country was supposed to be like originally, which if you haven't noticed is nothing like we are today. If they had their way, the stock market would be fixed the economic crisis wouldn't exist, we'd actually own our land once we bought it, we wouldn't allow lobbying to pervert congress senate and the presidency, could retire much easier without having to pay property tax and income tax and inheritance tax and cigarette tax and gas tax and alcohol tax and state plus federal tax, and sales tax and all the hidden taxes you don't even see, wouldn't support a gigantic out of control military industrial complex and bases all over the world trying to take over the world and wouldn't be the enemy of the world any more or have to get our nuts felt up just to get on a plane (now busses too.).

Wouldn't be a police state, wouldn't have unfair courts just designed to screw people, wouldn't have a bullshit war on drugs or wars overseas.

How crazy would that be? You could actually work and buy a home or land, and then once done just live off that land and grow your own food if you wanted without loosing it for some tax lean or other bullshit. Without having to pay out the ass until you're dead and having to make so much money while you work to keep up with inflation and rising costs practically nobody can get ahead of in the current corporate system.

Explain to me how all this is bad. It may need some work from there, I think things like the EPA etc were good when they worked for the interests of the people, but they don't any more and need complete rebuilding or teardown at the moment. As does most government and justice system and for profit prisons etc in this country, including the fed and everything about our dealings with the criminal IMF etc.. A full reset and about face from current policies is exactly what I think we do need. And wipe the books clean of thousand page legislation nobody can read nor comprehend all hidden agenda crap that's hidden in all of it, wipe clean of all those who have allowed us to head in such a wrong direction. Federal education standards have not helped that agency can sure go as can so many others because they either didn't help or made things even worse, in fact most has had the opposite effect of what was intended because double dealing and etc is allowed... you get the point.

I'm not sure who the right candidates are yet, but I know who aren't right.

Our government was supposed to serve us, the interests of we the people, the best interests of the countries and our childrens futures, not corporations not lobby groups, not federal banks and foreign aid etc just us and our best interest both short and long term.

"I often wonder when I hear people bash the tea party movement if they even understand it,"

OregonMeds, I don't think anyone here is trying to bash the tea party. The fact that Brown was popular with the tea party at one time is merely coincidental but it has nothing to do with what we're discussing here.

By the way, what ever happened to the Oregon Marijuana Initiative?

Scott Brown is really a pampered, bowl-of-cherries, Cinderella baby and how many of you fell for his hard luck story hook, line, and sinker?

Tsk. Tsk. How gullible.

I have a bridge I'd like to sell, anyone have any interest?

trishmybiscuits said:

"Heh, if Scott brown had a pampered bowl of cherries cinderella baby childhood, mine was WAYYYYY better than his was. Nobody molested me, except the hot neighbor girl, and I wouldn't really call it molestation, most would call it a blow job."

NoDrama, thanks, although I don't know what it has to do with what we're discussing here.
​

Click to expand...

I had a pretty normal childhood, much better than Senator Brown did, his childhood wasn't very good compared to mine, therefore your assertion that he had a Cinderella, bowl of cherries childhood is false. I HAD A GREAT CHILDHOOD!! Gonna cry about it, and tell me I'm am not being fair, and that no one should listen to me?