The Trurh about Federal Reserve Centreal Bank

spl1

Well-Known Member
I would like to point out before your read this, that it is not a bash on any of the two parties we have in this country.
This is a step back and look at what really is happening with are money system and who gets the interest off of the money printed in the USA.

Few perceive the truth about the Federal Reserve. Rare are those who know its origins. It is right in front of us, but our relative ignorance of economics and history is their protection. A quick history lesson is in order.

On October 14, 1066, AD., King William I founded the English monarchy. The Corporation was created by William in 1067 AD. to facilitate trade, and assure the continuation of the wealth of the monarchy. The City of London's legal name is The Corporation of the City of London. The City of London has unique political and economic privileges that do not apply to Greater London, or anywhere else in the British realm. The "City" even has its own police force that is sovereign.

The Bank of England was granted a royal charter on July 27, 1694, by William III to regularize the monarchy's finances. This scheme was invented by a Scot promoter named William Paterson. The scheme was to create a bank with a "fund for perpetual interest". Fractional reserve banking was created, along with the radical monetary concept of a "monopoly" bank which would create money for loans that would never be repaid. A perpetual money machine for the monarchy was born. The permanent National Debt was born. The Bank of England would finance the emerging empire from its headquarters in the City of London. Never again would the lack of money, or liquidity, hamper the British empire under normal economic conditions. Conveniently, the monarchy also controls the City of London. This assures that the heart of the economic machine will always be protected.

The United States fought a hard and expensive war against England in 1776 to achieve sovereignty. That included the right to have her own currency, control her own tax policies, and the avoidance of involvement in the affairs of other nations.

HistoryCentral.com > > War of 1812> United States Declares War on Great Britain
The United States declared War on Great Britain on June 12, 1812. The war was declared as a result of long simmering disputes with Great Britian. The central dispute surrounded the impressment of American soldiers by the British. The British had previously attacked the USS Chesapeake and nearly caused a war two year earlier. In addition, disputes continued with Great Britain over the Northwest Territories and the border with Canada. Finally, the attempts of Great Britain to impose a blockade on France during the Napoleonic Wars was a constant source of conflict with the United States.

The US did everything in their power to remove British influence and control from this continent. Again and again we defeated all attempts to allow our money to be controlled by a National (Central) bank. When Central banks were established, we abolished them. Times changed, and Thomas Woodrow Wilson was elected. The intellectual who wanted the League of Nations (the progenitor of the United Nations) was elected. Under his leadership, we received the Federal Reserve, and the Sixteenth Amendment (Income Tax) shackling us into slavery to the British Crown forever. In 1917, Wilson made the world safe for democracy by plunging the US into World War I

On December 23, 1913, the Federal Reserve Act, also known as the Glass-Owen Bill, was passed. The Republican controlled Senate rammed the bill through when many members of the US Congress were home for the holiday. The President, Dr. Thomas Woodrow Wilson, signed it into law one hour after being passed by the Congress! Somebody very powerful really wanted this law passed. The Federal Reserve System is an independent central bank. Although the President of the United States appoints the chairman of the Fed, and this appointment is approved by the United States Senate, the decisions of the Fed do not have to be ratified by the President, or anyone else in the executive branch of the United States government. Buried in the legislation was the granting of total power over the monetary policies of all US banks. A very curious statement is found in the original 1913 law. SEC. 30. The right to amend, alter, or repeal this Act is hereby expressly reserved. Reserved expressly to whom, or what? No definition is provided. This is the entire Section 30 statement!

Stock not held by member banks shall not be entitled to voting power. This clause guarantees
that no outsider can justify buying shares in the Federal Reserve. "But wait! There's more!"

Sec. 341 Second. To have succession for a period of twenty years from its organization unless it is sooner dissolved by an Act of Congress, or unless its franchise becomes forfeited by some violation of law. The Federal Reserve was only given a corporate life of 20 years! Their time was up in 1933 Who was President at that time? Franklin. D. Roosevelt, of course. Somehow, the Federal Reserve's termination did not occur. Reader, do I have your attention yet? My research failed to find any reauthorization of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, other than the tacit approval given by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

No Senator or Representative in Congress shall be a member of the Federal Reserve Board or an officer or a director of a Federal reserve bank. No member of Congress is have access to the inner sanctum! Hello, what is this? Are they afraid that an American might come upon something untoward? 12 USC 3019 Federal reserve banks, including the capital stock and surplus therein, and the Income derived therefrom shall be exempt from Federal, State, and local taxation, except taxes upon real estate.

Stock not held by member banks shall not be entitled to voting power. This clause guarantees
that no outsider can justify buying shares in the Federal Reserve. "But wait! There's more!"

Sec. 341 Second. To have succession for a period of twenty years from its organization unless it is sooner dissolved by an Act of Congress, or unless its franchise becomes forfeited by some violation of law. The Federal Reserve was only given a corporate life of 20 years! Their time was up in 1933 Who was President at that time? Franklin. D. Roosevelt, of course. Somehow, the Federal Reserve's termination did not occur. Reader, do I have your attention yet? My research failed to find any reauthorization of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, other than the tacit approval given by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

No Senator or Representative in Congress shall be a member of the Federal Reserve Board or an officer or a director of a Federal reserve bank. No member of Congress is have access to the inner sanctum! Hello, what is this? Are they afraid that an American might come upon something untoward? 12 USC 3019 Federal reserve banks, including the capital stock and surplus therein, and the Income derived therefrom shall be exempt from Federal, State, and local taxation, except taxes upon real estate. People, I think we are a roll now.

SEC. 25.Any national banking association possessing a capital and surplus of 1,000,000 dollars or more may file application with the Federal ReserveBoard, upon such conditions and under such regulations as may be prescribed by the said board, for the purpose of securing authority to establish branches in foreign countries or dependencies of theUnited States for the furtherance of the foreign commerce of the United States, and to act, if required to do so, as fiscal agents of the United States. Such application shall specify, in addition tothe name and capital of the banking association filing it, the place or places where the bankingoperations proposed are to be carried on, and the amount of capital set aside for the conduct of its foreign business. The Federal Reserve Board shall have power to approve or to reject such application if, in its judgment, the amount of capital proposed to be set aside for the conduct of foreign business is inadequate, or if for other reasons the granting of such application is deemed inexpedient. Wow, the US government has no formal control over the foreign operations of the Federal reserve banks! The Federal reserve banks are exempt from all taxation. These people are very independent. Independent of audits, independent of congressional supervision, and independent of the American voter.

The Federal Reserve claims that nobody owns it – that it is an "independent entity within the
government." The Federal Reserve is subject to laws such as the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act which cover Federal agencies but not private corporations; yet Congress gave the Federal Reserve the autonomy to carry out its responsibilities insulated from political pressure. Each of the Fed's three parts – the Board of Governors, the regional Reserve banks, and the Federal Open Market Committee – operates independently of the federal government to carry out the Fed's core responsibilities. Once a member of the Board of Governors is appointed, he or she can be as independent as a U.S. Supreme Court judge, though the term is shorter. As the nation's central bank, the Federal Reserve derives its authority from the U.S. Congress. It is considered an independent central bank because its decisions do not have to be ratified by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branch of government, it does not receive funding appropriated by the Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms. (The Fed's financial independence arises because it is hugely profitable due to its ownership of government bonds. (It gives the government billions of dollars each year.) However, the Federal Reserve is subject to oversight by the Congress, which periodically reviews its activities and can alter its responsibilities by statute. Also, the Federal Reserve must work within the framework of the overall objectives of economic and financial policy established by the government.

The only statements of ownership made by the Federal Reserve Board is an allusion to the twelve Federal district banks. This circle puts us back at the beginning, for no information is provided regarding the ownership of the twelve Federal district banks. However, a 1976 government study commissioned by the Federal Reserve Directors revealed the following:


OWNERSHIP OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE Most Americans, if they know anything at all about the Federal Reserve, believe it is an agency of the United States Government. This article charts the true nature of the "National Bank." Chart 1 Source: ** Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence ** - - Published 1976 Chart 1 reveals the linear connection between the Rothschilds and the Bank of England, and the London banking houses which ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York. The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn, Loeb & Co. were the firms which set up the Jekyll Island Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was drafted, who directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by Congress, and who purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914. These firms had their principal officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Advisory Council in 1914. In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks. Examination of the charts and text in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976 and the current stockholders list of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks show this same family control.

It's amazing how few grasped the significance of Alan Greenspan being knighted by the Queen of England! Greenspan was knighted on September 26, 2002. An obvious reward for preventing any real discussion, or change, of the Federal Reserve during the Sarbanes-Oxley Act debates. Had an American President been knighted, serious questions would have arisen. It was so each easier to reward her manager, Alan!

The British Crown, or the British monarchy is the owner of the Federal Reserve. This is their real secret. The strategy of the Federal Reserve is their other secret. Again, it is right of front of us, but no one sees the obvious. The strategy of the Federal Reserve is to accumulate all the wealth through the very slow, but effective, technique of currency debasement. The monarchs of old used to shave or clip the coins as they passed through their treasuries. Now the process is more sanitary, John Maynard Keynes clearly stated that at there is no more effective method of destroying a society than through currency debasement.

The Federal Reserve will always debase the currency to take its cut, and guarantee that the government has a tax base available to feed its bureaucratic family. The government is a total slave of the Federal Reserve. For example, analyze the latest real estate boom. There will be a major boost in property taxes based on the new valuations. Many people will be surprised when they receive their new tax bill. This will guarantee more money for the government coffers. They know that people will do almost anything to keep their homes. What's another job or two per family? Besides, the extra job will provide more tax revenue for the government. This will require more day care, or baby-sitting services for many families, which create more income for the government. This will cause more meals to be eaten out, which creates more revenue for the government Meanwhile, prices will continue to go up, which creates more sales tax revenue for the government.

Any questions, gang?

Free Markets For Free Men <--- what a joke!

HARD FACTS
[FONT=Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif]The Corporation of the City of London:http://www.fact-index.com/c/ci/city_of_london.html
The Bank of England:http://www.fact-index.com/b/ba/bank_of_england.html#History
The Sixteenth Amendment:http://www.lovetolearnplace.com/SpecialDays/IncomeTax/
Federal Reserve Act of 1913:http://aor.cat4.net/federalreserveact1913/
Federal Reserve: 2002 Amendment:http://www.frbdiscountwindow.org/federalreserveact.html
Federal Reserve ownership:http://land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/federal_reserve.shtml
[/FONT]
 

SouthernGanja

Active Member
So the Government was full of crooks way back then huh? Not really news and no different from today.

it WAS an interesting read though!
 

upnorth2505

New Member
Interesting background. Sounds like a conspiracy deal, which I think it is not. If not the Federal Reserve, then what? The Federal Reserve is need to control banking and financial markets. Even the great free-market advocate, economist Alan Greenspan, understood this.
 
Andrew Jackson routed the central bank out of the country though it cost him the Presidency. The Treasury is just as capable of issuing money as the Fed is and the interest would be owed to ourselves and not the city. the interest on the national debt - now that is quite a plum in the bankers pockets. Would you plan to create a deal like that? Conspiracy is to plan and you plan privately lest you cultivate opposition.
 

spl1

Well-Known Member
Interesting background. Sounds like a conspiracy deal, which I think it is not. If not the Federal Reserve, then what? The Federal Reserve is need to control banking and financial markets. Even the great free-market advocate, economist Alan Greenspan, understood this.
Alan Greenspan being knighted by the Queen of England.

I don't need to say any more right?

We don't need the Federal Reserve we need to start printing our own debt free, interest free green back based of the gold standard.

A few US Presidents tried this.

President Lincoln printed the greenback. (shot)

Andrew Jackson tried to reinstate the greenback. He was quoted as saying to Martin Van Buren "The bank, is trying to kill me, but I will kill it!"

The day after the attempt on his life.(Almost Shot)

Franklin D Roosevelt the day he was going to sign in the act to start printing the greenback.(shot)

John F Kennedy with Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S. the ability to create its own money backed by silver.(shot)

There are a few more congressmen that were fighting for the federal reserve to be removed from the USA and there plans fell out of the sky back to back with in days of each other??????????
How often does a plan crash? let alone ones that crash had a few congressmen per plane that were against the federal reserve.
 

Attachments

ViRedd

New Member
Interesting background. Sounds like a conspiracy deal, which I think it is not. If not the Federal Reserve, then what? The Federal Reserve is need to control banking and financial markets. Even the great free-market advocate, economist Alan Greenspan, understood this.
Upnorth: If you want to read something really good on the money issue, pick up a copy of Ayn Rand's "Capitalism; The Unknown Ideal." Its a compilation of essays, one of which, is by Alan Greenspan, written in 1966. In the essay, Greenspan addresses the importance of currency backed by precious metals, in this case, gold. Its a brilliant article. Its a little known fact that Alan Greenspan was a devoted member of Ayn Rand's inner circle. Its in paperback and a great read. :)
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Interesting background. Sounds like a conspiracy deal, which I think it is not. If not the Federal Reserve, then what? The Federal Reserve is need to control banking and financial markets. Even the great free-market advocate, economist Alan Greenspan, understood this.
The Federal Reserve is not needed at all, the USA ran for hundreds of years without a central bank. You have to go back to a gold/silver standard or have the government back the money ala Lincoln's "GreenBack" is all that is needed. Central Banks only cause currency debasement over a long term, our debasement is almost complete. Prices don't rise, your dollar is just worth less.

And let us not forget what Greenspan said about gold..."
[SIZE=-1]In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]protect savings from confiscation through inflation[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]. There is no safe store of value. If there were, the government would have to make its holding illegal, as was done in the case of gold. If everyone decided, for example, to convert all his bank deposits to silver or copper or any other good, and thereafter declined to accept checks as payment for goods, bank deposits would lose their purchasing power and government-created bank credit would be worthless as a claim on goods. [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists' tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights.[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] If one grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists' antagonism toward the gold standard."[/SIZE]




[SIZE=-1]So in other words, the dollar is doomed to be worth nothing!!
[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1][/SIZE]
 

spl1

Well-Known Member
The Federal Reserve is not needed at all, the USA ran for hundreds of years without a central bank. You have to go back to a gold/silver standard or have the government back the money ala Lincoln's "GreenBack" is all that is needed. Central Banks only cause currency debasement over a long term, our debasement is almost complete. Prices don't rise, your dollar is just worth less.

And let us not forget what Greenspan said about gold..."
[SIZE=-1]In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]protect savings from confiscation through inflation[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]. There is no safe store of value. If there were, the government would have to make its holding illegal, as was done in the case of gold. If everyone decided, for example, to convert all his bank deposits to silver or copper or any other good, and thereafter declined to accept checks as payment for goods, bank deposits would lose their purchasing power and government-created bank credit would be worthless as a claim on goods. [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists' tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights.[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] If one grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists' antagonism toward the gold standard."[/SIZE]




[SIZE=-1]So in other words, the dollar is doomed to be worth nothing!!
[/SIZE]
And if your going to buy gold it must be pre 1933 gold for your safest investments.

I do take care of a few coin dealers and they pay me in pre 1933 slabbed gold coins.


also silver rounds at spot price is a nice deal as well.

one last word pre 1964 silver coins like nickles, dimes, quarters, and half dollars are all keepers.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
pre 64 nickles don't have silver in them, unless your talking about the war time 1943 and 1944 ones that had 30% silver. Nickels have for the most part nickel as the main metal. That has changed, so you may want to start collecting those also, just like I collect all pre 1982 pennies, seeing as 1 pre 82 penny is worth almost 3 cents in metal value.
 

spl1

Well-Known Member
pre 64 nickles don't have silver in them, unless your talking about the war time 1943 and 1944 ones that had 30% silver. Nickels have for the most part nickel as the main metal. That has changed, so you may want to start collecting those also, just like I collect all pre 1982 pennies, seeing as 1 pre 82 penny is worth almost 3 cents in metal value.
Your right I spaced out the nickle has no metal value, my bad but the rest does.

The only real value left is old gold and any silver, and the old pennies.
Also I trade meds for any scrap gold, silver and platinum any time I get a chance.

Also coins are the last true investments that they can't touch if it is pre 1933 gold, no tax, and they can't touch it like modern gold products.
 

beardo

Well-Known Member
great thread thanks...its funny how dumb people are and 'conspericys' are public info...they don't even have to classify it people are to dumb for reading or thinking
 

Pipe Dream

Well-Known Member
beat me to that money masters video post lol such a great movie but scary. As far as the coin collecting I started out last year and got really into it got all sorts of gold and silver coins it's definately a good investment and it's a lot of fun too. I wish I was your customer I gotta sell about a 1/4 oz so I can get some $ to buy some more herb to hold me down for a while.
 

redivider

Well-Known Member
no. no. no.

stop watching so much fox news, those BUY GOLD advertisements are not doing you too well.

buying gold is only a good idea if you can afford to get it insured, and locked up in a safe place.

if you have 500 dollars, and spend 500 dollars on gold, and you can't insure it, you're screwed. 500 dollars worth of gold is like a coin and a half of the good stuff by the way, and it's very VERY VERY VERY VERY easy to loose.

precious metals should never be over 20% of your savings, even in this recession there's hundreds of other savings products that are safer than precious metals.

stop this lets return to the gold standard of 100 years ago bullshit, it was removed to make trade easier. it's a lot easier for commerce to operate if everybody uses the same unit to measure value. instead of having a price stated in gold, to have somebody pay you in silver, or another metal.... that's how they did it in the 1600's, we've progressed somewhat since then......

only very VERY wealthy folks, with enough money to spend on safety deposit boxes, insurance, etc. should invest large portions of their money in precious metals. the rest of us, just go to the bank.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
no. no. no.

stop watching so much fox news, those BUY GOLD advertisements are not doing you too well.

buying gold is only a good idea if you can afford to get it insured, and locked up in a safe place.

if you have 500 dollars, and spend 500 dollars on gold, and you can't insure it, you're screwed. 500 dollars worth of gold is like a coin and a half of the good stuff by the way, and it's very VERY VERY VERY VERY easy to loose.

precious metals should never be over 20% of your savings, even in this recession there's hundreds of other savings products that are safer than precious metals.

stop this lets return to the gold standard of 100 years ago bullshit, it was removed to make trade easier. it's a lot easier for commerce to operate if everybody uses the same unit to measure value. instead of having a price stated in gold, to have somebody pay you in silver, or another metal.... that's how they did it in the 1600's, we've progressed somewhat since then......

only very VERY wealthy folks, with enough money to spend on safety deposit boxes, insurance, etc. should invest large portions of their money in precious metals. the rest of us, just go to the bank.
So instead of backing Federal Reserve paper with gold, it should be backed with nothing? Pretty good ponzi scheme, and it's all protected by the force of laws too.

How is knowingly stealing through inflation any different than wearing a mask and holding a gun to somebody?
Men in business suits can be thieves too.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
no. no. no.

stop watching so much fox news, those BUY GOLD advertisements are not doing you too well.

buying gold is only a good idea if you can afford to get it insured, and locked up in a safe place.

if you have 500 dollars, and spend 500 dollars on gold, and you can't insure it, you're screwed. 500 dollars worth of gold is like a coin and a half of the good stuff by the way, and it's very VERY VERY VERY VERY easy to loose.

precious metals should never be over 20% of your savings, even in this recession there's hundreds of other savings products that are safer than precious metals.

stop this lets return to the gold standard of 100 years ago bullshit, it was removed to make trade easier. it's a lot easier for commerce to operate if everybody uses the same unit to measure value. instead of having a price stated in gold, to have somebody pay you in silver, or another metal.... that's how they did it in the 1600's, we've progressed somewhat since then......

only very VERY wealthy folks, with enough money to spend on safety deposit boxes, insurance, etc. should invest large portions of their money in precious metals. the rest of us, just go to the bank.
Pretty much what I would expect from you. My gold is safer in my basement floor safe than any bank in the world. Only I know where the gold is at and I have an alarm system, cameras a dog and enough firepower to lay waste to a small town. My bank only has a big vault and an alarm. Hey guess what happened to all those people in 1933 who kept their gold in a safe deposit box? Yep, the government took all that gold for themselves, they stole it. But the fella who kept his gold in an old shoe box in the attic still had his.

By law, gold and silver are not taxable nor are they reportable to the federal government, when you sell it back you are supposed to declare any capital gains, but since they don't know you have any why even do that? Its like claiming all the money you made selling weed and paying a tax on it.

500 dollars of gold is not even half a gold double eagle coin. Gold is currently 1103 per ounce and a US gold eagle doesn't quite have an ounce in it.

There are other good investments, gold and silver mines come to mind, but if the currency devalues, anything denominated in dollars won't be worth jack squat. Everyone in Zimbabwe is a trillionaire, too bad it takes 100 trillion to buy an apple.
 

spl1

Well-Known Member
no. no. no.

stop watching so much fox news, those BUY GOLD advertisements are not doing you too well.

buying gold is only a good idea if you can afford to get it insured, and locked up in a safe place.

if you have 500 dollars, and spend 500 dollars on gold, and you can't insure it, you're screwed. 500 dollars worth of gold is like a coin and a half of the good stuff by the way, and it's very VERY VERY VERY VERY easy to loose.

precious metals should never be over 20% of your savings, even in this recession there's hundreds of other savings products that are safer than precious metals.

stop this lets return to the gold standard of 100 years ago bullshit, it was removed to make trade easier. it's a lot easier for commerce to operate if everybody uses the same unit to measure value. instead of having a price stated in gold, to have somebody pay you in silver, or another metal.... that's how they did it in the 1600's, we've progressed somewhat since then......

only very VERY wealthy folks, with enough money to spend on safety deposit boxes, insurance, etc. should invest large portions of their money in precious metals. the rest of us, just go to the bank.
I would rather lose my 500 bucks in my house than to have that worthless piece of crap in office take it from me and give it to the the worthless dinks that think they deserving of some thing they did not earn.

I read on another thread on this site that people that make to much money during this times deserve it taxed away from them.

There is very little stocks worth buying right now, I would only invest in commodity based companies that sell things like toiletries, food, fuels, and now hospital that are publicly traded and Heath Care insurance companies.

If I am feeling froggy I may even get into a few grains, and meats from time to time.

As for T-bills, bonds, cd, and any other investments right now, I would not touch it with a ten foot poll.
I take that back If I had they money I would short the Dow every time Obama talks on the air waves.:fire:

My savings are 100% metals, and they are locked up in my big ass gun safe. I just opened it up again I may have to buy another one next month, lol

As for the gold standard it should have never stopped, the federal reserve had the gold in fort knox moved years ago to there warehouse when we started spending more money as a Gov. since then we have asked the federal reserve for and accounting of our gold and they have told us it is safe over 20 times in 15 years but have never given the USA a balance sheet on our holdings.

I think it is in China to help ease there feelings about holding so much debt of ours.

That's just my opinion
 

spl1

Well-Known Member
great thread thanks...its funny how dumb people are and 'conspericys' are public info...they don't even have to classify it people are to dumb for reading or thinking
It is amazing how many people walk around with there head in the sand 24/7.
Most of them are always looking for the next freebie or hand out, or how they can con some one out of what they want.

I like to earn it, that way I know the value of it. I tend to enjoy it more.

As for the new knowledge at hand you will be called a crazy, or a non American. My favorite is I'm a conspiracy nut.
 
I would rather lose my 500 bucks in my house than to have that worthless piece of crap in office take it from me and give it to the the worthless dinks that think they deserving of some thing they did not earn.

I read on another thread on this site that people that make to much money during this times deserve it taxed away from them.

There is very little stocks worth buying right now, I would only invest in commodity based companies that sell things like toiletries, food, fuels, and now hospital that are publicly traded and Heath Care insurance companies.

If I am feeling froggy I may even get into a few grains, and meats from time to time.

As for T-bills, bonds, cd, and any other investments right now, I would not touch it with a ten foot poll.
I take that back If I had they money I would short the Dow every time Obama talks on the air waves.:fire:

My savings are 100% metals, and they are locked up in my big ass gun safe. I just opened it up again I may have to buy another one next month, lol

As for the gold standard it should have never stopped, the federal reserve had the gold in fort knox moved years ago to there warehouse when we started spending more money as a Gov. since then we have asked the federal reserve for and accounting of our gold and they have told us it is safe over 20 times in 15 years but have never given the USA a balance sheet on our holdings.

I think it is in China to help ease there feelings about holding so much debt of ours.

That's just my opinion
I am told it is in a special vault in France owned by Rothchild. If anyone tries to rob the place it is flooded in less than a minute by water from the Seine (spelling?) 200 feet above.
 
Top