Sounds to me like you're smokin' some good shit.
haha.... you wish
It is unfair to compare jesus to ghengis Khan or socrates, since they were true historical figures with many many references from DIFFERENT sources confirming their identities and deeds. There are NO corroborating references for jesus.haha.... you wish
sorry buddy, but there is more evidence to support the existance of Jesus than there is of Gangus Khan or Socrates. But I dont see you saying neither of them existed.
You have a hatred for Jesus and therefore you do not have an open mind. Any proof of His existance will immediately be disreguarded because your mind is already closed.
No, My sig is based upon FACT. Most religions end up out of favor at some point and then drift into accepted myth. Christianity will follow as sure as the sun sets. Hopefully it will end the day of cult beliefs.....I hope.
hey now! thats jus catholics
I'm gonna unsubscribe this thread...i really don't need people preaching to me.
It is more than fair to compare Jesus to Khan and Socrates, as there is MORE evidence to support the existance of Jesus, than there is of either of them.
The bible is simply a book of stories...nothing more. Think about it...back in the day when the average life span was around 30-35 you got people living thousands of years. More like fairy tales...It is more than fair to compare Jesus to Khan and Socrates, as there is MORE evidence to support the existance of Jesus, than there is of either of them.
Ive seen you post numerous times that there is no evidence and blah blah blah, even after Ive given you links and referrences to back up His existance.
Like I said, your closed minded mentality will prevent you from seeing anything except for what you want to see. Open your mind my friend, take the red pill
And why should you discredit the validity of the bible? Do you have any idea what historical documents are? The bible was not written by a single person, or a single group. It is a collection of over a hundred different authors.
Further, the vast majority of scholars will grant that the Epistles of Paul were in fact written by Paul in the middle of the first century A.D., less than 40 years after Jesus' death. In terms of ancient manuscript evidence, this is extraordinarily strong proof of the existence of a man named Jesus in Israel in the early first century A.D.
It is also important to recognize that in A.D. 70, the Romans invaded and destroyed Jerusalem and most of Israel, slaughtering its inhabitants. Entire cities were literally burned to the ground. We should not be surprised, then, if much evidence of Jesus' existence was destroyed. Many of the eyewitnesses of Jesus would have been killed. These facts likely limited the amount of surviving eyewitness testimony of Jesus.
