This is what happens when politics go one sided

Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Justin-case said:
Nobody likes you.
Please stop spamming the forum with white nationalist propaganda.
Click to expand...
Lots of people like me. Just maybe not the usual cast of sychophants here.

By the way, I don't mean to disparage your poor debate skills, but you seem seriously outmatched any time refuting something comes up and you seem to run to insults and conflating things rather hastily.

It's not that I don't enjoy fucking with you, but I always feel bad picking on somebody that is clearly a little slow and unable to construct even a rudimentary argument. Then I remember how rude you are and think well, he's probably compensating for unusually small genitalia and I feel even worse for you.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Sanitas Vibrationum said:
We just call them "commies"
Click to expand...
exactly

There is an alt right movement that is distinctly different from past nationalist white supremacist movements but the left is still communist, and anti-capitalist socialist or anarchist. Hasn't changed at all.

The "alt left" is term invented by radical righties to control the narrative. Such as @Flowki
 
Sanitas Vibrationum

Sanitas Vibrationum

Active Member
Fogdog said:
exactly

There is an alt right movement that is distinctly different from past nationalist white supremacist movements but the left is still communist, and anti-capitalist socialist or anarchist. Hasn't changed at all.

The "alt left" is term invented by radical righties to control the narrative. Such as @Flowki
Click to expand...
Exactely right, hence I posted the definition. Alt-right = Nazis and alt left = commies just that simple ;)
 
PCXV

PCXV

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
According to you, she has no reason. According to HER, does she have a reason to decline and isn't that reason a line which she should decide where it exists ? Something to ponder.

You be sure and have a nice day and try hard not to manage others live for them.
Click to expand...
Her reason is pigmentation? Her business can fuck off out of this Country.

You be sure to try to enjoy your thinly veiled racism and bullshit ideology.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Sanitas Vibrationum said:
Exactely right, hence I posted the definition. Alt-right = Nazis and alt left = commies just that simple ;)
Click to expand...
No, there is no alt left.

just plain old commies. Take a look at the dumbshit OP's description of alt left. It's a simple and well worn debating tool to redefine your opponent's position in your own words to take control of the debate. There is no self described alt left. There is the left consisting of anti-capitalists, some that are authoritarian (communists) and some that are anti-authoritarian (anarchists, antifa) and some that are in the middle between authoritarian and anti-authoritarian (socialists). There is a self described alt right. There is no self-described alt left.
 
Sanitas Vibrationum

Sanitas Vibrationum

Active Member
Fogdog said:
No, there is no alt left.

just plain old commies. Take a look at the dumbshit OP's description of alt left. It's a simple and well worn debating tool to redefine your opponent's position in your own words to take control of the debate. There is no self described alt left. There is the left consisting of anti-capitalists, some that are authoritarian (communists) and some that are anti-authoritarian (anarchists, antifa) and some that are in the middle between authoritarian and anti-authoritarian (socialists). There is a self described alt right. There is no self-described alt left.
Click to expand...
Ok, I got you point, yes Antifa will never proclaim they are ultra or (alt left) - they call themselves SJW flyffy loving bunnies that fight Nazis..

Don't take any of my posts serious, no self respecting man will argue politics serious on the pot forum with mentally disabled homos lurking around spewing their shit all over this sub.... C'mon man ;)
 
Last edited:
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Sanitas Vibrationum said:
Ok, I got you point, yes Antifa will never proclaim they are ultra or (alt left) - they call themselves SJW flyffy loving bunnies that fight Nazis..

Don't take any of my posts serious, no self respecting man will argue politics serious on the pot forum with mentally disabled homos lurking around spewing their shit all over this sub.... C'mon man ;)
Click to expand...
I come here for my own entertainment also to learn what others who are different from me are saying. Sometimes I debate those people and by doing so I learn more about the topics of the day.

This is not serious. Getting pneumonia without having health care coverage is serious. Getting laid off and losing health care coverage is serious. Having one's mother deported is serious. Being in jeopardy of deportation when DACA ends is serious. Debating whether or not there is an alt left is not serious.

On the other hand, it was interesting to me to learn through these discussions that some people are actually buying in to right wing's juvenile tactic of creating a word for their opposition, applying their own definition to it and feeding it to their followers for later regurgitation as truth. I find this interesting and something to look out for in the future.

But not serious. Then again, propaganda, when effective is serious.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Sanitas Vibrationum said:
Ok, I got you point, yes Antifa will never proclaim they are ultra or (alt left) - they call themselves SJW flyffy loving bunnies that fight Nazis..

Don't take any of my posts serious, no self respecting man will argue politics serious on the pot forum with mentally disabled homos lurking around spewing their shit all over this sub.... C'mon man ;)
Click to expand...
i believe anifa calls themselves "anti fascists" you bumbling idiot
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
PCXV said:
Her reason is pigmentation? Her business can fuck off out of this Country.

You be sure to try to enjoy your thinly veiled racism and bullshit ideology.
Click to expand...
That response has no legs, sounds full of emotion and is frighteningly bereft of any logic.

First, if I were being racist, I wouldn't insist a person of any race has a right to self determine and decline an interaction with someone they preferred not to interact with.

Second, if my ideology is based in human interactions which are voluntary are superior to ones which are involuntary, it can be inferred you support human relations that arise from involuntary circumstances wherein one party imposes them on another neutral and / or peaceful person. That was a fancy way of saying you're taking the same stance as a prohibitionist when it comes to human relations.

I'll be sure to enjoy pointing out your inconsistencies and wish you every success navigating thru life while you are walking in circles and insisting black women serve white men against their will while insinuating I am a racist.
 
Justin-case

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
That response has no legs, sounds full of emotion and is frighteningly bereft of any logic.

First, if I were being racist, I wouldn't insist a person of any race has a right to self determine and decline an interaction with someone they preferred not to interact with.

Second, if my ideology is based in human interactions which are voluntary are superior to ones which are involuntary, it can be inferred you support human relations that arise from involuntary circumstances wherein one party imposes them on another neutral and / or peaceful person. That was a fancy way of saying you're taking the same stance as a prohibitionist when it comes to human relations.

I'll be sure to enjoy pointing out your inconsistencies and wish you every success navigating thru life while you are walking in circles and insisting black women serve white men against their will while insinuating I am a racist.
Click to expand...
I thought we asked you to stop spamming the forum with white nationalist propaganda?
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
That's a flawed assumption, (as usual) but a reasonable approach in the manner of your question. I appreciate that.

So, let's expose your erroneous assumption and contradictory philosophy, Poopy Pants. You sanctify taking away one persons right, and somehow (in your opinion) simultaneously protect another parties nonexistent right to forcibly engage another person.

I don't think people interacting or not interacting on a basis they decide is any of my business. In fact I know it isn't. It's none of your business either if it doesn't involve you. I accept that as virtually axiomatic, you ought to.

So, when you pretend you and other people DO have a right to force person A to interact with person B, you are violating the equal right of person A to decline a human relationship. People who forcibly don't take NO for an answer when another person doesn't want to interact with them include rapists, slave masters, governments of all kinds and YOU.

I'm not spamming anything white nationalist, for one thing, I was born on a small Pacific island and I'm not much for "nations" or nationalists held together by political magic and imaginary boundaries. It's my hope people come to realize that forced relations as a personal and systemic means can never eliminate the things people hope to eliminate, it is logically impossible. Plus, you shouldn't shit on other people's floors...ever. Bad karma.
Click to expand...
the health department doesn't like it either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top