Too many producers: Analyst says market needs some pot growers to go out of business

gb123

Well-Known Member
ROTFLMFAO..Oh No worries fuck wads YOUR TIME HAS COME
LEGACY WILL STAY PUT and LEGAL SHIT WILL FALL HARD! YA BOYEEE:weed::clap::idea::bigjoint:bongsmilie



Many at the Lift & Co. conference and expo were excited about "Legalization 2.0." Analysts reminded them to expect more tough times in 2020.
A cannabis conference brought bright, smiling young entrepreneurs to Vancouver this week but also analysts warning that the fledgling industry can expect more tough times in 2020.

Many vendors at the Lift & Co. Cannabis Business Conference & Expo were talking Friday about “Legalization 2.0,” the second phase of the federal government’s regulation of recreational cannabis that brought edibles and extracts to store shelves around Christmas.

But after months of layoffs, facility shutdowns and tanking stocks, those products won’t be enough to save the industry, analysts warned.

On Thursday, a Piper Sandler analyst sent a note to clients downgrading licensed producer Aurora Cannabis Inc.’s stock to what amounted to a sell, lowering the target price from $3 to $1. In November, Canopy Growth Corp.’s share price hit a 2019 low after it posted a $374.6-million quarterly loss, missed analyst revenue estimates and warned that a key revenue target may not be achieved.

Craig Wiggins of the independent analysis firm TheCannalysts brought more doom and gloom during a presentation at the expo on Friday.

Story continues below


By the end of October, licensed producers were storing 721 days of inventory, he said. That could hit 816 days a year from now, according to his optimistic forecasting.

“This will be catastrophic unless certain things happen,” Wiggins said. “More retails stores and ‘2.0’ does not fix this. Something has to give. We need companies to go out of business. It sucks to say it, but we need a rightsizing of the harvests. We need people to write off inventory.”

Wiggins said Canada’s licensed producers had good growth in sales by volume after legalization, up 25 per cent between October 2018 and February 2019, and 109 per cent between March and August. But growth then flattened to about one per cent between August and October 2019.

“That is far from the market that all the big firms were telling you about,” he said.

“A big part of why we haven’t rolled out well is there isn’t access to stores, there isn’t enough 2.0 product out there, price, quality, convenience.”


Lucas McCann, chief scientific officer for Canndelta Consulting, at Lift & Co. Cannabis Expo at the Vancouver Trade and Convention Centre on Jan. 10, 2020. Mike Bell / PNG


Meantime, licensed producers continue to harvest at a rate that far exceeds legal sales, about 4.42 kilograms for every kilogram sold, Wiggins lamented.

“The optimistic scenarios get us to 2.26 — that’s still way too high,” he said. “We have too much inventory.”

Wiggins said cultivation must be throttled back, inventory destroyed, or sales must increase to an “impossible” level.

“Plus, you know what? The unregulated market is good at keeping clients,” he said. “Exports simply will not fix this problem. They’ll be too late and not enough. We have a massive issue that we have to deal with.”

Lucas McCann, chief science officer at CannDelta Inc., a cannabis consulting firm, said regulatory framework involving multiple levels of government is complicated and not working well, creating delays of up to a year before producers can get Health Canada approvals.

“Then, once licensed producers do become licensed, there is nowhere to move the product,” Mc Cann said. “There are bottlenecks everywhere throughout the system.”

B.C.’s requirement for security background checks for retail store employees has delayed the hiring of staff, making it even more difficult to get product to market, he said.

“When we go and do site audits and inspections for a lot of the facilities, (we are) looking at non-compliance because they’ll have so much product, their secured storage will be absolutely filled,” McCann said.

“It’ll be stored in the hallways and they’ll be conducting activities in rooms that aren’t licensed for those activities. They’re doing this because they’re trying to stay afloat. They continue to harvest and they must harvest — they’re paying these staff.”

McCann said the introduction of extracts and edibles to the market will help ease some of the industry’s woes.

“But we’re also seeing that there are a lot of people flooding the market right now, trying to still get licences and do massive growth,” he said.

“That is impacting the stock market price so we’re going to see a lot of correction over the next few months, we’re going to see a few bankruptcies, we’re going to see a few people really solidify their position in the market and probably a few mergers and acquisitions.”

Elisabeth Stahura, president of the Colorado-based BDS Analytics, said her firm sees Canadian firms facing the same challenges experienced by U.S. states as they transitioned from medical cannabis to adult-recreational use in recent years.

“B.C. continues to have a very thriving legacy channel and legacy market,” she said. “It’s very similar to what we see in California. Two years out of the gate of adult-use legalization, 75 per cent of the sales are still going for that legacy market, so what you see is a stunting of the market in California.”

Stahura said California growers and retailers are at a continued disadvantage, compared to illicit sellers, due to higher costs and regulations requiring them to test products.

“From the consumer standpoint, it’s very difficult to differentiate between the regulated product, from their perspective, and the legacy product,” she said.

Stahura said high taxes on vaping products in B.C. — 20 per cent PST — will challenge the sales of one of the cannabis-derivative products most popular in the U.S. As well, the slow opening of stores, particularly in Ontario, will lead to more “bumps along the road,” she said.

“All that said and done, we do predict Canada 2020 sales to be about $2.6 billion, so that’s a pretty strong growth rate from the about $1.7 billion that we saw in 2019,” she said.

“So it’s not all doom and gloom.”
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
“More retails stores and ‘2.0’ does not fix this.



hahahahahahahhahahah brainiac thought eh hahahhhahahaha
ITS FRIGGIN AWESOME AS HELL TO HEAR THEM SAY SOMETHING HAS TO GIVE????????

YA ..............................:idea:YOU FUCK WITS YOU Greedy IDIOTS GOT To GIVE....................... THAT;S WHO

WAKE UP AND SMELL YOUR OWN DEATH :lol:

;)
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
"Wiggins said cultivation must be throttled back, inventory destroyed, or sales must increase to an “impossible” level."


he's all wigged out :lol:



OH MAN This moron really is fucked up :lol:

Ill let ya in on a little on going inside joke.....................YOU LOST.......... WE WON To bad so sad eh :)
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
I grew the Bakerstreet Hindu Kush from Tweed (Lift?), it was solid, no complaints. That’s the best I’ll say about that.
reg commercial SHOULD be OK
lol

Remember They got it from US after all :)
They were given crap to start with Got stuck with it,,,,,,,,,, Government allowed them to buy from black market
buy black market sources making them legal and hence having their strains along with it etc lol
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
you gotta be joking ..they were not given crap...but i bet irradiation gets in the way
I hear that anyone who gave them seeds and KNOW HOW ..gave them mediocre crap seeds.
Now WE ALL KNOW having the best strains is what its about and no on in their right mind would have given or sold them their best stock

that's a given
and
no one who was anybody in the industry went their way to begin with
So LP;s supply and have SHIT strains by what I see. and I stand by that statement :)
 

OLD MOTHER SATIVA

Well-Known Member
I hear that anyone who gave them seeds and KNOW HOW ..gave them mediocre crap seeds.
Now WE ALL KNOW having the best strains is what its about and no on in their right mind would have given or sold them their best stock

that's a given
and
no one who was anybody in the industry went their way to begin with
So LP;s supply and have SHIT strains by what I see. and I stand by that statement :)

lol..thanks for your opinion bro!
 

OLD MOTHER SATIVA

Well-Known Member
ok gb 123 i have thought about this a bit more..

what i am trying to say is there may be something more than not good genetics,,

20% thc weed is potent..they have more than 20 % thc weed

humour me please and don't argue on this point right now..


yes the genetics LP's have it may not be like some of the crusty photo's on IG that are supposed to be 30 %+

but that stuff is rare and growing it to that % is even more rare..

whether people didn't give them their best doesn't matter ..people don't keep lousy genetics around any more

there basically isn't any lousy genetics any more....

...its not that 20% thc weed cannot be great stuff

their environment should be good..growing weed is not rocket science...they got all the toys

i know i am sounding like a broken record but

don't you think that cold pasturization/irradiation may be the real culprit why the herb is not like non LP weed?

i mean we have Hust17saying Baker Street was good..

what was the difference?

She grew it

.....it was not irradiated..

you can think of a few more parameters gut this is the only one that LP's use and no one else does

i am just bored here with "LP''s suck"..its more than genetics ..its more than their grow talent

..ok they are having a tough time now..maybe let up enough to do some thinking about

the possibly that cold pasturization/irradiation could EVEN turn 35% well grown Animal Sunset Sherbet Cookie Goober Glue[ASSCGG #63]

into stuff that is not great.....

pass me off and i promise will give up and not post here again and you will be done with me

open to not just gb123..there be awhole 8 people who come here

i mean Hippy has had me on ignore for years..what does he think about this thought

yo homies!
 
Last edited:

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
A big part of why we haven’t rolled out well is there isn’t access to stores, there isn’t enough 2.0 product out there, price, quality, convenience.”
Hahahahahahaha.....I'm sure that's what the problem is....
“Plus, you know what? The unregulated market is good at keeping clients,” he said. “Exports simply will not fix this problem. They’ll be too late and not enough. We have a massive issue that we have to deal with.”
More hahahahahaha...that darn old unregulated market....why doesn't this speak volumes to people?...lol...
Lucas McCann, chief science officer at CannDelta Inc., a cannabis consulting firm, said regulatory framework involving multiple levels of government is complicated and not working well, creating delays of up to a year before producers can get Health Canada approvals.

“Then, once licensed producers do become licensed, there is nowhere to move the product,” Mc Cann said. “There are bottlenecks everywhere throughout the system.”
Whine, whine, whine....when you get into bed with the government...just sayin'
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Most All "legalization" has some kind of prohibition baked into it. When you bake prohibition into something, you skew the free market. When you skew the free market, you advance an unfree market which is designed with perverse incentives and backed by threats of violence to the noncompliant.

Unfree markets are why we can't have nice things at the micro and the macro level, in nearly all aspects of humankind. *

People who whine to have government "fix" problems caused by government can use all the tird polish they want, but at the end of the day, unfree markets will still be tirds.

What many "legal growers" essentially say is "don't tread on me, go tread on them over there" . They ask government to protect them from free market competition, and guarantee them a profit.

May a plague of spider mites befall the whining protectionism seeking turncoats.

Free the fucking weed!




* Prove me wrong. Muhahaha
 

zoic

Well-Known Member
what i am trying to say is there may be something more than not good genetics,
IMHO one of the other reasons is likely that they cut to soon. I am no expert grower but I have learned that for the best results you need to let the plant finish. When I cut early the quality is dimished, as compared to letting it keep growing. Growing by the 8 week clock is selling yourself short, I have had strains that worked best after 15 weeks.
 

BurtMaklin

Well-Known Member
Honestly, I dont think the highest quality product is what the market is after right now. I have buddies that buy those 100 dollar ounces and they're happy with that, even though its, IMO, crap.

Most of it has immature seeds in it, nanners all through it and tastes like "weed", is harsh and I wouldn't smoke it if it was free, but regular people aren't going to fork over a mortgage payment per month to smoke the very best. People who really care about quality already grow their own.

LPs have had dream facilities built for them, had oodles of time to select quality strains, nutrient regimens and dial in their environments, so I'm kinda perplexed as to why they don't produce better than what my hillbilly ass grows in a 6×9 room in my basement, with basic ambient air exchange and a second hand dehum.

I think I gotta go with OMS on this one, there is no reason for B grade leaving those Facilities other than their irradiation treatments. Some of the simplest people I know grow good weed, it's really not that hard.
 

chex1111

Well-Known Member
ok gb 123 i have thought about this a bit more..

what i am trying to say is there may be something more than not good genetics,,

20% thc weed is potent..they have more than 20 % thc weed

humour me please and don't argue on this point right now..


yes the genetics LP's have it may not be like some of the crusty photo's on IG that are supposed to be 30 %+

but that stuff is rare and growing it to that % is even more rare..

whether people didn't give them their best doesn't matter ..people don't keep lousy genetics around any more

there basically isn't any lousy genetics any more....

...its not that 20% thc weed cannot be great stuff

their environment should be good..growing weed is not rocket science...they got all the toys

i know i am sounding like a broken record but

don't you think that cold pasturization/irradiation may be the real culprit why the herb is not like non LP weed?

i mean we have Hust17saying Baker Street was good..

what was the difference?

She grew it

.....it was not irradiated..

you can think of a few more parameters gut this is the only one that LP's use and no one else does

i am just bored here with "LP''s suck"..its more than genetics ..its more than their grow talent

..ok they are having a tough time now..maybe let up enough to do some thinking about

the possibly that cold pasturization/irradiation could EVEN turn 35% well grown Animal Sunset Sherbet Cookie Goober Glue[ASSCGG #63]

into stuff that is not great.....

pass me off and i promise will give up and not post here again and you will be done with me

open to not just gb123..there be awhole 8 people who come here

i mean Hippy has had me on ignore for years..what does he think about this thought

yo homies!
I know you are exactly right. Have known for years. If terpenes were not temperature sensitive, why would you lose the nose and flavour just from drying some plain old regular way?
 
Top