Topdawg Genetics

naiveCon said:

Maybe he will do better with his kennel...lol

Click to expand...

What if the dog turns out to be a mutt??? Lmao

My male came from the same release as the Kate Upton pheno. 2011 maybe?
That batch was super purple. Affy as hell

Gu~ said:

My male came from the same release as the Kate Upton pheno. 2011 maybe?
That batch was super purple. Affy as hell

Click to expand...

Obviously a stand alone strain!
Don't loose him man.
I'd like to try the illuminati but that's not likely to happen.

What i beleive to be my only stable cut of super stardawg 2.0. First pack of seeds i ever bought. 3 females, first 2 runs hermed and pollinated. I paid $125 for a pack of seeds and wanted to make sure it wasnt operator error so i hung onto the cuts. First runs were in my shared grow, i now have 2 small tents for sexing and test runs of new genetics. First thing i did was run all 3 cuts. Im down to one! This pic is day 29, its on day 36 now. They seem to like to start their transition around week 5/6, ill be keeping a close eye on this one for the next couple weeks. If she survives, i will call her caitlyn.

Cletus clem said:

What i beleive to be my only stable cut of super stardawg 2.0. First pack of seeds i ever bought. 3 females, first 2 runs hermed and pollinated. I paid $125 for a pack of seeds and wanted to make sure it wasnt operator error so i hung onto the cuts. First runs were in my shared grow, i now have 2 small tents for sexing and test runs of new genetics. First thing i did was run all 3 cuts. Im down to one! This pic is day 29, its on day 36 now. They seem to like to start their transition around week 5/6, ill be keeping a close eye on this one for the next couple weeks. If she survives, i will call her caitlyn.
View attachment 3989349

Click to expand...

shit you only got 3 females out of the 11 seeds in pack and 2 of the 3 hermed I was under the impression that the 2.0 in stardawg 2.0 meant that it was more stable than previous version. wtf
nice plant but damn

Crippykeeper said:

under the impression......meant that it was more stable than previous version. wtf

Click to expand...

yeah, we all did, I observe obvious decline in the newest td gear I run. I love on the older stuff though, but I dunno whats going on in those seeding rooms these days.

From what i gather, 2.0 just means different mom. Not the mass superskunk, but who knows. Sucks, i bought it thinking it was. $125 for 1 pack and a boatload of frustration. $140 for 3 packs of bodhi gear, so far yielding 9 fems from 2 packs, all some of the nicest shit ive seen. And i got the mass superskunk x appalachia.

i think 2.0 means twice the phenos of the 1.0

greenghost420 said:

i think 2.0 means twice the phenos of the 1.0

Click to expand...

2.0 is a different male off the same father

Super skunk = 2.0
Mass super skunk = first version
From what I've read?

I got 2 bubblegum diesel that look great just flipped the switch on em. Gonna be some high yielding bushes

I'm going to start 5-6 Sour Stardawgs soon. I don't have a stress tent going but I do try to keep the newer stuff concentrated to one corner of my bloom room. The most easily accessible side so I can try to keep an eye on em.

greenghost420 said:

i think 2.0 means twice the phenos of the 1.0

Click to expand...

Or, twice as likely to herm?

So yeah, this has been my experience:

Pretty much been a 50/50 split for guesses as to whats different. Dont matter, like the strain, if i conclude its stable ill hang onto it. I dont think ill be buying anymore top dawg genetics though. Plant issues aside, he comes across as kind of a douche in the public relations department. Always some fucking stupid drama. Yeah, dude has fire genetics. So do other people, for less money, or less douchebaggery, or both. I have no problem paying either. Im chomping at the bit to drop $150 on bros grimm c99 and $120 on OG jawa pie, malibu pie or alien rift. Then back to bodhi gear for days. There are sooooo many strains now, ill give my money to peoole with less arrogance and butthurt

Cletus clem said:

So yeah, this has been my experience:
View attachment 3989681
Pretty much been a 50/50 split for guesses as to whats different. Dont matter, like the strain, if i conclude its stable ill hang onto it. I dont think ill be buying anymore top dawg genetics though. Plant issues aside, he comes across as kind of a douche in the public relations department. Always some fucking stupid drama. Yeah, dude has fire genetics. So do other people, for less money, or less douchebaggery, or both. I have no problem paying either. Im chomping at the bit to drop $150 on bros grimm c99 and $120 on OG jawa pie, malibu pie or alien rift. Then back to bodhi gear for days. There are sooooo many strains now, ill give my money to peoole with less arrogance and butthurt

Click to expand...

There is only one right answer. JJ use new males. when he came back he used a new male to remake many of his newer crosses 2015 - 2016 and unward. @Vato_504 is correct...

I'm a vulture picking at bones at this point.
91 chem #12. Sure ill pick it up
Sister city , and the skunk cross chemphlegm talks about if it ever pops up again.
I'd kill for a straight onycd or onycd 3.
But otherwise it's green point all the way.

I don't lend credence to clone only/exclusive.
chem sis, chem 4, chem d, extinct.
And if any cuts truelly exist, they're too far gone genetically.
Chem 91 is robust because it's crossed ie nl, haze, skunk,
Stardawg shines still because of the affie in double dawg but it needs another injection.
The new chems, are hybrids and need work imho
Common sense says chem chucking days are over,
work the lines or watch em fade into obscurity like the ak's and white widows of Christmas past

morgwar said:

I'm a vulture picking at bones at this point.
91 chem #12. Sure ill pick it up
Sister city , and the skunk cross chemphlegm talks about if it ever pops up again.
I'd kill for a straight onycd or onycd 3.
But otherwise it's green point all the way.

I don't lend credence to clone only/exclusive.
chem sis, chem 4, chem d, extinct.
And if any cuts truelly exist, they're too far gone genetically.
Chem 91 is robust because it's crossed ie nl, haze, skunk,
Stardawg shines still because of the affie in double dawg but it needs another injection.
The new chems, are hybrids and need work imho
Common sense says chem chucking days are over,
work the lines or watch em fade into obscurity like the ak's and white widows of Christmas past

Click to expand...

I fear you may be right. Just to be sure about the genetics here, Chem was more or less 'found' and not 'worked' to become Chem, right?

Green_Skunk said:

I fear you may be right. Just to be sure about the genetics here, Chem was more or less 'found' and not 'worked' to become Chem, right?

Click to expand...

Not sure really. I hear people say they worked it. Maybe somebody could pipe in give JJ some support.
I'm not ready to all out trash the guy, by any means. Sour attitude is a turn off but not a deal breaker if the dudes actually breeding some of it.

morgwar said:

Not sure really. I hear people say they worked it. Maybe somebody could pipe in give JJ some support.
I'm not ready to all out trash the guy, by any means. Sour attitude is a turn off but not a deal breaker if the dudes actually breeding some of it.

Click to expand...

Everyone is a cut chucker now. So many to choose from and much more profitable than working multiple lines.

Double dawg is definitely worked. Onycd 3.0 has some work.
I'd buy a lot of what would be considered old stuff.
Id pick 12 of the best if I were him and rerelease as a stable and reasonable catalog. Slow down new releases to 1 or 2 a year and just pump out my good strains.
But cuddles is right, chem soup for everyone!
I hope I get some sour and meaty bits in mine.