"Trudeau government also wants to adopt stricter laws..."

G

gb123

Well-Known Member
VIANARCHRIS said:
No...I'm jumping on Dizzy for her lack of understanding or separation between a forum on medical marijuana and one on politics. Half of her posts have nothing at all to do with marijuana, she's just looking for a platform to continue fighting the Liberals. The only thing dizzy concerns her tiny little mind with is Justin Trudeau....weird. When there is post after post calling other posters various childish names based on which political party they support or voted for, and then refusing to defend or even discuss her position....I rightfully call that toxic. I'm not sure why she continues to single me out, but I can give it back 10x's...and I will. You wouldn't sit back while I repeatedly called you out, why do you think I should give the troll a pass?
"so far we are. getting screwed ....thats it thats all"... How do you figure? What has the Liberal government done on the marijuana front, either medical or recreational the would constitute 'getting screwed'? We're talking actual actions, not Dizzy's dooms-day scenarios. I can't think of one thing...if you come up with something, pass it along.
Click to expand...
she seems to like you the most Chris.
It's a watered and fed scenario bongsmilie
 
OLD MOTHER SATIVA

OLD MOTHER SATIVA

Well-Known Member
" I admit I am pessimistic about Dizzy suddenly becoming a contributor..."t,,,hats funny..4 stars ****

'Most of us socially evolved in middle school"

we all progress at different rates..be compassionate/patient
 
WHATFG

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
well to be honest chris, we shouldn't be talking about medical...that should have been a given...it's not...that in my eyes is a failure....I don't give a fuck about recreational.
 
VIANARCHRIS

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
WHATFG said:
well to be honest chris, we shouldn't be talking about medical...that should have been a given...it's not...that in my eyes is a failure....I don't give a fuck about recreational.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure why medical hasn't been fixed yet, but it wasn't a promise, so it's hardly a failure. I only care about recreational to keep my kids from getting criminal records. I expect HC will be court ordered to allow medical grows, and then we'll see if they respect that or try the Harper approach. It wouldn't look good on the Liberals to still be in court with medical users fighting a Harper era policy while they are selling the legal rec plan to the country. I may be in the minority on this site, but I am not worried about them taking my garden...I just don't see it. They may try tighter controls around licenses, but with legalization comes acceptance and negates the need to police it beyond commercial sale.IMO.
And to be clear, Dizzy seldom posts about marijuana at all, be it recreational or medical. The post above is a prime example. Maybe a site mod will get around to turning this into a marijuana forum again, someday......
 
doingdishes

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
the thing fo rme is that this was already done through the courts and that's how we got to have home grows/ DG's. somehow personal production was taken away. they can't give you something then take it away and expect us to believe and believe in that the "new way" is better. we can see through their crap but when we call them on it, they deny it. i really don't get it.
if the courts said we have to have reasonable access and we have proven the barriers, what's the problem?? either let us grow of have it covered by the medical insurance...instead of LP being covered in PM. give it a DIN.
they say they can't without testing but they have given DIN's to stuff that was later proven to be harmful but something that has proven to not be harmful can't get one...???
 
OGEvilgenius

OGEvilgenius

Well-Known Member
VIANARCHRIS said:
I don't understand your mindset. The government controls just about every industry in this country through various laws and regulation, yet the ONLY time we hear opposition is when it comes to marijuana? I personally don't have a problem with regulation as long as it strikes a balance that society can accept. The comparison to booze and smokes is very relevant in the context of 'public safety laws'. Marijuana is an intoxicant and it is inhaled, it will be treated as such. I'm not saying it's what everyone wants legal to look like, I saying that is what society will dictate. As long as we have the right to grow for personal recreational use, and the right to grow or have someone else grow quantities needed for medical use, any laws around sales or access to youth are OK by me.
Click to expand...
And the government is not your friend.

I have a problem with almost everything the government does.

For example, you cannot distill your own hard alcohol... bullshit. And the actual reasoning is even worse, yeah they say safety - but in reality it's about not allowing you to make your own fuel. That's why prohibition started in the first place... both, at the same time.
 
Last edited:
VIANARCHRIS

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
OGEvilgenius said:
And the government is not your friend.

I have a problem with almost everything the government does.

For example, you cannot distill your own hard alcohol... bullshit. And the actual reasoning is even worse, yeah they say safety - but in reality it's about not allowing you to make your own fuel. That's why prohibition started in the first place... both, at the same time.
Click to expand...
Nor is the government my enemy. Every government makes decisions that not everyone agrees with...that's why we get to express our opinion and vote our displeasure. A blanket statement like "I have a problem with almost everything the government does" sounds pretty extreme, and your example is a little strange. I have no idea about distilling laws, but considering the alternative sources of fuel available, I'm sure that's not a consideration in today's world. Anyone can get a license to open a distillery...you just gotta follow the rules. There's a small one just down the road from me. Like I said, I don't get your mindset of condemning legalization before you know what it looks like, simply because you have an aversion to government. Clearly we aren't looking at it from the same angle, cause I am perfectly fine with reasonable government controls on lots of things.
 
G

gb123

Well-Known Member
correct about not being able to make pure alcohol
although they do sell home stills to purify water...no reason why you couldn't put your old wine and what not in there.. 8) for home use of course.
 
OGEvilgenius

OGEvilgenius

Well-Known Member
gb123 said:
correct about not being able to make pure alcohol
although they do sell home stills to purify water...no reason why you couldn't put your old wine and what not in there.. 8) for home use of course.
Click to expand...
Oh of course you can do it anyway, but if they catch you you will catch a big fine.

Like life shattering large AFAIK.
 
G

gb123

Well-Known Member
"IF" ?
more like,,,,, why and how?

If you think for an instant this kind of thing would get you fined or in trouble....
ummm......not likely dude man...the only one who would get you in trouble would be the guy calling them in a drunken stupor and informing them what he did... :lol:

Please....spare me the givens!!!
 
OGEvilgenius

OGEvilgenius

Well-Known Member
The penalty for a summary conviction in Canada is 10,000 - 500,000 dollar fine and 18 months in jail. For an indictment it's 50,000 to 1,000,000 and 5 years in jail.

It's worse in the States.

From what I'm reading it isn't a law that's been really tested. But it's there. So be wary.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top