Trump attacks Juror in Roger Stone's case.

So now Trump is using the power of the Presidency to attack jurors in the Roger Stone case, where he was found guilty for witness tampering and lying to congress about the fact that he was involved in the Russian election interference and about what he was communicating back to Trump about it:



That is not dangerous at all for that person I bet. With the trolling that Roger Stone is famous for, my bet is that he had his attorneys leave that Juror in place just to use as a troll against his trial.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-suggests-roger-stones-jury-forewoman-had-significant-bias/2020/02/13/67e102ee-4e68-11ea-b721-9f4cdc90bc1c_story.html

The question of bias is legit, proper to investigate. We all know a pardon is coming after the election so Stone should probably serve 3-6 months to be fair with other obstruction sentences. Everything about this case has been out of line with the crimes committed.

Bugeye said:

The question of bias is legit, proper to investigate. We all know a pardon is coming after the election so Stone should probably serve 3-6 months to be fair with other obstruction sentences. Everything about this case has been out of line with the crimes committed.

Click to expand...

Are your nose hairs orange?

Bugeye said:

The question of bias is legit, proper to investigate. We all know a pardon is coming after the election so Stone should probably serve 3-6 months to be fair with other obstruction sentences. Everything about this case has been out of line with the crimes committed.

Click to expand...

Bias in Jury? That is why the lawyers have that little picking their jury thing at start, if there was a issue they should have done something then. Also just because someone is a Democrat doesn't mean that they are 'biased', that is purely cult logic.

Roger Stone was found guilty of working with the Russians to use stolen documents to help Trump cheat his way into the Oval Office by timing them to hurt Hilary Clinton, and then lied to the FBI to screw with their investigation. It's pretty screwed up if you care about our democracy and not allowing foreign nations to use their military to cheat our system.

hanimmal said:

Bias in Jury? That is why the lawyers have that little picking their jury thing at start, if there was a issue they should have done something then. Also just because someone is a Democrat doesn't mean that they are 'biased', that is purely cult logic.

Roger Stone was found guilty of working with the Russians to use stolen documents to help Trump cheat his way into the Oval Office by timing them to hurt Hilary Clinton, and then lied to the FBI to screw with their investigation. It's pretty screwed up if you care about our democracy and not allowing foreign nations to use their military to cheat our system.

Click to expand...

If the jury members lied during selection, that is a problem. If they told the truth, not a problem. So I think I agree with you.

Bugeye said:

If the jury members lied during selection, that is a problem. If they told the truth, not a problem. So I think I agree with you.

Click to expand...

Trump will tell you the juror lied with no evidence and you will lick his ass again.

Bugeye said:

If the jury members lied during selection, that is a problem. If they told the truth, not a problem. So I think I agree with you.

Click to expand...

Yeah, it is pretty sad that you are going immediately to someone on the jury being the possible liar instead of the President and all his men who have over and over have shown that they are fully willing to lie cheat and steal as long as they are not under oath.

But I am guessing you are quantifying the 'if' they lied as some kind of way to just bring up some bullshit and it not really being anything untrue.

hanimmal said:

Yeah, it is pretty sad that you are going immediately to someone on the jury being the possible liar instead of the President and all his men who have over and over have shown that they are fully willing to lie cheat and steal as long as they are not under oath.

But I am guessing you are quantifying the 'if' they lied as some kind of way to just bring up some bullshit and it not really being anything untrue.

Click to expand...

Just covering the possibilities and my reaction to them. You seem a little touchy, chill out man. No big deal, just giving my opinion like everyone else.

Bugeye said:

Just covering the possibilities and my reaction to them. You seem a little touchy, chill out man. No big deal, just giving my opinion like everyone else.

Click to expand...

Oh I'm sorry I didn't realize you pulled back into not just trolling the forum, it has been a while since you just spammed links.

I still stand by all of Trump's people being proud of their being liars and that they project their flaws onto others nonstop.

Corey Lewandsowski 'I have no obligation to be honest with the media', admitting he lies to the public.

Sarah Sanders lying to the public from the White House in the name of the President of the United States.


Barr trying to figure out how to get away with lying to the Senate while under oath, it is not surprising he has obstructed congress by not adhering to subpoena after this:

I could go on.

I really do dislike liars being hypocritical and trying to project blame on other innocent people who don't have the same ability to protect themselves. And have never seen anything like Trump's administration's scale of doing just this.

It basically comes down to, Trumps a fucking asshole, and a thief. I can tolerate assholes.......I fucking hate thieves, not sure what else to say.