Trump's gonna smash the golden calf

SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
ArcticGranite said:
Food for thought:

If you want to make a prediction of the future about as safe as predicting the time of tomorrow's sunrise, you can predict that every mainstream news source in the country will parrot the upcoming NASA press release without mentioning that the new supposed "record" is not supported by the far-more-accurate satellite data.

http://manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2017/1/4/the-greatest-scientific-fraud-of-all-time-part-xi
Click to expand...
When you start questioning empirical data from the guys that put us on the moon you're entering "fuck off" territory with me.
 
ArcticGranite

ArcticGranite

Well-Known Member
ArcticGranite

ArcticGranite

Well-Known Member
Wilderb

Wilderb

Well-Known Member
ArcticGranite said:
House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith said during a Tuesday hearing that NOAA “has deceived the American people by falsifying data to justify a partisan agenda.” He will now push for all documents related to the climate study, materials he requested via subpoena in 2015 after Obama Administration officials refused to disclose them.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/02/10/congress-investigates-federal-climate-change-study-after-whistleblower-exposes-fake-science/
Click to expand...
Chairman Lamar Smith? The one who doesn't believe in evolution? Ya, I would cite that guy, lol.
 
ArcticGranite

ArcticGranite

Well-Known Member
Wilderb said:
Chairman Lamar Smith? The one who doesn't believe in evolution? Ya, I would cite that guy, lol.
Click to expand...
Forget Smith. Take a shovel, dig a bit. The controversy's over Dr. Bates allegations of Tom Karl's study.

"The explosive allegations from Dr. Bates were detailed in the Daily Mail and on the scientific blog, Climate, Etc. on February 5. Bates accuses Tom Karl, former director of the NOAA office responsible for climate data, of manipulating temperature readings, failing to archive data, and ignoring agency protocols to rush publishing his study that debunked the well-known pause in global warming at the beginning of this century.

At the time, climate activists were in a panic because the premier scientific body in charge of climate science—the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)—admitted the rise in global temperatures had basically stalled from 1998 to 2012. This bombshell was included in the IPCC’s 2013 report, which would serve as the main primer leading up to the United Nations’ Climate Conference in Paris two years later."
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
ArcticGranite said:
Forget Smith. Take a shovel, dig a bit. The controversy's over Dr. Bates allegations of Tom Karl's study.

"The explosive allegations from Dr. Bates were detailed in the Daily Mail and on the scientific blog, Climate, Etc. on February 5. Bates accuses Tom Karl, former director of the NOAA office responsible for climate data, of manipulating temperature readings, failing to archive data, and ignoring agency protocols to rush publishing his study that debunked the well-known pause in global warming at the beginning of this century.

At the time, climate activists were in a panic because the premier scientific body in charge of climate science—the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)—admitted the rise in global temperatures had basically stalled from 1998 to 2012. This bombshell was included in the IPCC’s 2013 report, which would serve as the main primer leading up to the United Nations’ Climate Conference in Paris two years later."
Click to expand...
Lol, in the Daily Mail...
 
Wilderb

Wilderb

Well-Known Member
ArcticGranite said:
Forget Smith. Take a shovel, dig a bit. The controversy's over Dr. Bates allegations of Tom Karl's study.

"The explosive allegations from Dr. Bates were detailed in the Daily Mail and on the scientific blog, Climate, Etc. on February 5. Bates accuses Tom Karl, former director of the NOAA office responsible for climate data, of manipulating temperature readings, failing to archive data, and ignoring agency protocols to rush publishing his study that debunked the well-known pause in global warming at the beginning of this century.

At the time, climate activists were in a panic because the premier scientific body in charge of climate science—the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)—admitted the rise in global temperatures had basically stalled from 1998 to 2012. This bombshell was included in the IPCC’s 2013 report, which would serve as the main primer leading up to the United Nations’ Climate Conference in Paris two years later."
Click to expand...
Some more info on the subject.

http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/news/more-fake-news-in-the-mail-on-sunday/


Seems like the good DR might have an agenda?
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
ArcticGranite said:
Forget Smith. Take a shovel, dig a bit. The controversy's over Dr. Bates allegations of Tom Karl's study.

"The explosive allegations from Dr. Bates were detailed in the Daily Mail and on the scientific blog, Climate, Etc. on February 5. Bates accuses Tom Karl, former director of the NOAA office responsible for climate data, of manipulating temperature readings, failing to archive data, and ignoring agency protocols to rush publishing his study that debunked the well-known pause in global warming at the beginning of this century.

At the time, climate activists were in a panic because the premier scientific body in charge of climate science—the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)—admitted the rise in global temperatures had basically stalled from 1998 to 2012. This bombshell was included in the IPCC’s 2013 report, which would serve as the main primer leading up to the United Nations’ Climate Conference in Paris two years later."
Click to expand...
I knew this Limbaugh promoted piece of shit would be regurgitated by you. Are you like Rush? Do you believe that the scientists want the government to control every aspect of your life so they are making this all up so you won't drive a big car? It must have been tough for you to have nobody to parrot Rush to. Lol.
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja said:
Lol, in the Daily Mail...
Click to expand...
Even worse, AlaskanLimpNoodle got it from Fox Radio. Rush told him that if climate change believers were smarter they would have said that global warming paused because of the steps taken to reduce emissions of greenhouse gas were working. "But they were too stupid to do that" and instead made up a justification through the paper in question.

And he believed him. Lol. Stupid noodle.


Hey @ArcticGranite , there are reasons the "drive-by media" don't report this shit but it is not for the reasons Rush tells you. It is because it is baseless and false. But you believed it - because you are smaaaaart.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top