Two years wasted on the Mueller Investigation. How will the media discredit President Trump next?

MichiganSpinDoctor

MichiganSpinDoctor

Well-Known Member
Moses Mobetta said:
Unfortunately getting rid of trump doesn't solve the underlying and to me the more serious issue that lies within individuals who he makes sense to. Not just those who voted for him but those who continue to support him as well as those in high places who seek to keep him in power
Click to expand...
Lol. You mean Americans. You think the underlying problem is Americans who want a free country.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
MichiganSpinDoctor said:
Lol. You mean Americans. You think the underlying problem is Americans who want a free country.
Click to expand...
Trumpkins oppose majority rule, they oppose rule of law and Trump is the first president in a long time who flat out lies to the public while his minority of supporters clap on the sidelines. All to say that Trumpkins and Trump are a threat to freedom in the US. But you already knew this. I'm pointing it out for the historical record.
 
MichiganSpinDoctor

MichiganSpinDoctor

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Trumpkins oppose majority rule, they oppose rule of law and Trump is the first president in a long time who flat out lies to the public while his minority of supporters clap on the sidelines. All to say that Trumpkins and Trump are a threat to freedom in the US. But you already knew this. I'm pointing it out for the historical record.
Click to expand...
You sound hysterical. Keep it up until 2020.
 
MichiganSpinDoctor

MichiganSpinDoctor

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
You could try sticking to facts and speaking truth for a change. But then again you wouldn't be a Trump supporter if you did.

AnyDemocrat 2020
Click to expand...
Hopefully the censor chief thinks I look silly enough calling them out, so they leave the video up this time.* They removed the video for a third time. Mark dice puts out a new video every morning and it is always relevant to a political conversation. I agree with nearly everything I have heard from him, and he says it more concisely and with more humor than I can. Every single morning.
 
Last edited:
MichiganSpinDoctor

MichiganSpinDoctor

Well-Known Member
Seems like the star report back in the 90s found enough evidence to indict bill Clinton on 11 crimes. Clinton was banned from practicing law. Not impeached.

Seems like the Mueller report didn't find enough evidence to indict trump on any crimes at all.

Y'all look seriously crazy. I love it. Trump 2020
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
MichiganSpinDoctor said:
Seems like the star report back in the 90s found enough evidence to indict bill Clinton on 11 crimes. Clinton was banned from practicing law. Not impeached.

Seems like the Mueller report didn't find enough evidence to indict trump on any crimes at all.

Y'all look seriously crazy. I love it. Trump 2020
Click to expand...
“Does not exonerate “



Cuckold
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
MichiganSpinDoctor said:
Seems like the Mueller report didn't find enough evidence to indict trump on any crimes at all.

Y'all look seriously crazy. I love it. Trump 2020
Click to expand...
LOL . You so certain?

This from an NPR interview with New York University law professor Ryan Goodman
https://www.npr.org/2019/04/20/715393964/mueller-report-law-professor-on-prosecuting-an-obstruction-of-justice-case


GOODMAN: There are a series of these incidents. He basically directs Don McGahn to write a false statement about having told McGahn to get Mueller fired. So that - I think that for some people like myself and I think for many listeners, they might realize that's, like, not even just, like, destroying evidence, but it's creating evidence. So I think there are a number of these that, in the aggregate, add up to a very serious case, I would say, of obstruction. Some of them individually crossed that line, and it seems that they would have crossed that line by Mueller himself but for the fact that he was operating under the Justice Department's position that a sitting president cannot be indicted.

SIMON: So could you prosecute an obstruction of justice case if it failed you?

GOODMAN: I think that this would be a pretty straightforward case. Another way I've thought of it is, any American but for the president of the United States would be indicted for these actions. If these were all the actions that they were alleged to have committed, I'm pretty sure that's also what Mueller is sending us as a signal.

SIMON: Ryan Goodman, law professor and editor of Just Security. Thanks so much for being with us.

I know this is too much text for you to sound out, so I'll pick out a half-sentence for you to work on: "any American but for the president of the United States would be indicted for these actions."
 
Last edited:
Moses Mobetta

Moses Mobetta

Well-Known Member
MichiganSpinDoctor said:
Lol. You mean Americans. You think the underlying problem is Americans who want a free country.
Click to expand...
Actually they are wealthy fascists. People who want a free country and lay around on their ass spending their rich daddy's money while guys like me are flying to the other side of the world getting shot at while those same guys are planning the demise of the majority riding around safely in limousines sipping champagne are not good people. Enjoy your fantasies while they last, those Americans as you call them would have you working for slave wages and dying of things that were preventable, had you had the health care they prevented you from getting after they spent your pension on lavish vacations in tropical regions with prostitutes. Have a happy Easter
 
Last edited:
MichiganSpinDoctor

MichiganSpinDoctor

Well-Known Member
You will notice that my message contained no advertising or spam, only my opinion and a video from Mark dice, who puts out a new video every single morning.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top