uk pop to be cut down to 30 million

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Let me get this straight, instead of coming up with a viable long-term solution that actually addresses the issues that the "problem" causes these idiots want to just kill a lot of people, or failing that euthanize them, or force them to not screw.

This is idiotic. Instead of wasting Billions on this "Solution" (you know, isn't that what the Germans called the Holocaust?) why don't these idiots come up with a way to colonize space, which would provide for a new place for population to go.

The interesting thing about frontiers is that they tend to attract people that are sick of crowds.

There's a reason why I think Environmentalists, and Globalists are idiots, this is one of them. Instead of trying to come up with solutions that do not involve killing, forced euthanasia or forced vasectomies and forced ... whatever ... they want the solution to include those things.

Bloody stupid, idiotic, short-sighted, egotistic and tyrannical.

As far as who goes first...

Well, the people that are pushing this proposed "solution" should of course go first.

SAVE THE PLANET AND KILL YOURSELF!
 

max420thc

Well-Known Member
that one hell of a socialized medicine policy.id rather we try these population reduction theorys in lands like africa,china and india,
 

Drgreenz

Well-Known Member
that one hell of a socialized medicine policy.id rather we try these population reduction theorys in lands like africa,china and india,
no kiddin, lets start with areas that have basically failed at providing the world with something good lately.
 

Drgreenz

Well-Known Member
You all shoul djust google agenda 21 or hell look it up on the UN website. Its a pretty scary thing that nearly every UN country has signed onto(including the US thanks to Obama last week)
 

joepro

Well-Known Member
I believe nacy pelosi said the samething about america.
to many needs...simple answer, less people!!

I guess total control isn't enough, we have now become in the way.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
We could do without a few politicians right about now. Dodd, Frank, Pelosi, Reid, and Obama to name a few..... scandalous people.

out. :blsmoke:
 

Drgreenz

Well-Known Member
hey that might be a good start, i would like to see the average carbon emissions compared to the average polititions emissions. they want to get rid of us for the greenhouse reason lets start with them.
 

misshestermoffitt

New Member
It said some scientists are in favor of a reduction. How's that going to work? Is it going to be Shirley Jackson lottery time?

This is some scary stuff, did someone say Obama is on board with this too?
 

Drgreenz

Well-Known Member
ok so i was cruising another political forum and they were saying that Obama has signed on the UN's agenda 21 and implication is suposed to begin in spring 2012.
The UN website also said it goes into effect 2012 but didn't say much else about "how". But even the UN website states that under agenda 21 the earth should have a sustainable population of 500 million worldwide. also they released this map of designated "human areas" and "natural areas off limits to human developement"
also check this out:
http://www.amerikanexpose.com/agenda21/index3.html
the black parts of the map are the human allowed areas
 

medicineman

New Member
I think they were just stating facts. If the world wants long term survivability for the human race, it needs to cut the population to around a billion. That means that 5.5 billion have to go. What better way then a massive disease. Does the bird flu ring any bells? Donald Rumsfeld has enough serum to save all his repuke friends and their friends, probably around a billion. Damn, I know I'm not on the list. But what the hell, I think I'd rather pass on than stick around and do body duty, getting rid of all the decomposing corpses, although they'd probably make good organic fertilizer, or soylent green.
 
Top