USA goes to WAR with mexico, ........

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
if you're trying to be funny/ironic, i don't get it or it's not funny.

if you're trying to be serious, i would laugh but more in an 'at you' than 'with you' kind of way.

either way...:roll:
what, you actually think your post on a message board really means anything?

now i'm laughing at YOU. :clap:
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
The title of this thread is a bit off, USA is actually going to war with Arizona on behalf of Mexico. Siding with a foreign country over one of our 50 states. Treason anyone?

no, this thread is about US agents killing mexicans. i should know, i started it, ;)
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
Seems like the RIU braintrust is at it again.....:sigh:

The US government sues states all the time. It's part of how our system works. If it's treason, then every administration we've ever had has been extremely treasonous.

Maybe we could sell arizona to the tea party and they can all have their tax-free police state there and deport all the illegals, gays and lefties. We could probably throw in a couple of others like oklahoma and kansas, too....we keep texas though.

Also, you do realize that if we invade and annex mexico, it comes with a lot of mexicans, right...? And they won't be illegal anymore, either.
exactly. if we are going to pay for them, we might as well take control.

i'm sure we could find many ways to use mexico is a productive way.

i don't have a problem with mexcians, i have a problem with illegals.
 

Countryfarmer

Active Member
no, this thread is about US agents killing mexicans. i should know, i started it, ;)
Come on now Fdd. You know threads take on their own lives, and this one certainly has. :)

As to US agents killing Mexicans, I assume you are talking about the recent death of the teenager who was throwing rocks at the border control agent. Rocks are a deadly weapon, probably the first deadly weapon homosapiens used against one another. Just because it is a prehistoric deadly weapon does not make it any less of a deadly weapon.

So I guess the lesson is, throw rocks at a border control agent and expect to get shot.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
Come on now Fdd. You know threads take on their own lives, and this one certainly has. :)

As to US agents killing Mexicans, I assume you are talking about the recent death of the teenager who was throwing rocks at the border control agent. Rocks are a deadly weapon, probably the first deadly weapon homosapiens used against one another. Just because it is a prehistoric deadly weapon does not make it any less of a deadly weapon.

So I guess the lesson is, throw rocks at a border control agent and expect to get shot.

so you don't even read the first post before you start spewing?

redundant.



people keep poppin' in here saying "that's not what this thread is about". that's absurd. :roll:

this thread is about fucking up mexico for putting a burden on us. and it will never happen.

we should either bomb them and take over. or simply close the fucking border.

or we can just offer the world tea as we bend over. it's not like china doesn't already own us anyways.
 

SmokeyMcSmokester

Well-Known Member
Big war is coming, the USA may be entangled on 5 different fronts. Mexico, Iran and Korea might be the next countries we go into to show them the imperialistic power of the largest most well equipped army the world has ever known. This should be a hoot. Sarcasm off.
its ok...we dont need an army to kick mexicos ass..just your avg gun toting american can keep those fuckers at bay.
 

Countryfarmer

Active Member
Whoa there partner!

Am I going to read this entire thread? Nope, even with the maximum responses per page, it is still 19 pages long. If I want to read that much I will go back to reading Jon Meacham's Pulitzer winning bio on Andrew Jackson that I started last night. This is simply a diversion .... and to paraphrase you, if you actually think anything any of us says on this thread really means anything then you deserve to be laughed at.

I'm certainly not going to read the first post and respond to it. The conversation has developed far past that point, and as I tried to say in a humorous manner (hence the smiley icon) you should know that.

One thing I have noticed Fdd is that you do tend to get your panties twisted fairly easily and then chastise people (your "spewing" comment). Do you do so because you are attempting to entice someone into making a personal attack against you and then you can use your moderating authority to ban them? Sorry, I don't play that game.

Perhaps you might want to take a moment out of your day to reflect as to why you find it necessary to be ugly to someone you have never met on a message board. Hope you have a good day.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
are mexican illegals really decedents of people whose land this was first anyway ????? just saying

didn't the dinosaurs own it before then?

who was here first? no one.

this land is our land. we killed for it. want it "back"? simple, take it. we did, ;)
 

Countryfarmer

Active Member
are mexican illegals really decedents of people whose land this was first anyway ????? just saying
Using that logic London, I would like most of Alabama and a portion of Georgia back. You see my mother is half Creek and her people, along with the Cherokee and other natives were forced off their land by Jackson on the aptly named "Trail of Tears".
 

Mindmelted

Well-Known Member
Get the fuck over that shit londonfog(must have fog in your head).
We beat their ass in the war and then paid them 15 million.
Done and fucking over with,our land get the fuck out.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
Whoa there partner!

Am I going to read this entire thread? Nope, even with the maximum responses per page, it is still 19 pages long. If I want to read that much I will go back to reading Jon Meacham's Pulitzer winning bio on Andrew Jackson that I started last night. This is simply a diversion .... and to paraphrase you, if you actually think anything any of us says on this thread really means anything then you deserve to be laughed at.

I'm certainly not going to read the first post and respond to it. The conversation has developed far past that point, and as I tried to say in a humorous manner (hence the smiley icon) you should know that.

One thing I have noticed Fdd is that you do tend to get your panties twisted fairly easily and then chastise people (your "spewing" comment). Do you do so because you are attempting to entice someone into making a personal attack against you and then you can use your moderating authority to ban them? Sorry, I don't play that game.

Perhaps you might want to take a moment out of your day to reflect as to why you find it necessary to be ugly to someone you have never met on a message board. Hope you have a good day.

my panties aren't twisted. i'm laughing while i mock you.

like i said, do you think posting on a message board matters? obviously you do.


does this help? lololololololololololololololol
 

Countryfarmer

Active Member
its ok...we dont need an army to kick mexicos ass..just your avg gun toting american can keep those fuckers at bay.
America will never be taken by a foreign power in a shooting war simply because there are too many weapons in civilian hands within the US. Now we can be taken over by a swing in culture due to birth rates. Within my lifetime I expect whites to become a minority. Math doesn't lie.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
Come on now Fdd. You know threads take on their own lives, and this one certainly has. :)

As to US agents killing Mexicans, I assume you are talking about the recent death of the teenager who was throwing rocks at the border control agent. Rocks are a deadly weapon, probably the first deadly weapon homosapiens used against one another. Just because it is a prehistoric deadly weapon does not make it any less of a deadly weapon.

So I guess the lesson is, throw rocks at a border control agent and expect to get shot.
i went back to where you started it. :)


you assume? so you DIDN'T even read the first post.
 

Countryfarmer

Active Member
Ok Fdd, when you can articulate a response better than a twelve year old, I'll give you a response. Jesus, that one was the equivalent of a kid sticking his fingers in his ears while sticking out his tongue.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
Ok Fdd, when you can articulate a response better than a twelve year old, I'll give you a response. Jesus, that one was the equivalent of a kid sticking his fingers in his ears while sticking out his tongue.
now YOU turn it into a personal attack. when you do get banned, don't blame me.
 

Countryfarmer

Active Member
I never called you dumb, but I do consider your "lolololololol" bit both juvenile and an attempt to entice me into an actual personal attack. Whatever Fdd. I think I will go back to reading my bio and let you have fun trying to get someone else to respond in kind to your ugliness so you can evidently exercise your ban stick. Have fun.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
I never called you dumb, but I do consider your "lolololololol" bit both juvenile and an attempt to entice me into an actual personal attack. Whatever Fdd. I think I will go back to reading my bio and let you have fun trying to get someone else to respond in kind to your ugliness so you can evidently exercise your ban stick. Have fun.
my lololol was to let you know "my panties weren't in a bunch". or did you conviently forget that comment as well?

you came at me first.

i'm chillin' with coffee and bongloads. my wife isn't even awake yet. you have a great day. :)
 
Top