Vero 29 V2 800PPFD 5 X 5 Question.

Rahz

Rahz

Well-Known Member
NoFucks2Give said:
What does "per foot" mean?
Click to expand...
Per square foot. People often refer to watts per square foot, but that will also include all the waste heat generated. Par watts per square foot is a more direct indicator of radiant intensity. As you have noted it doesn't take into account the spectrum or optical considerations, but that doesn't skew the results enough to keep it from being useful.
 
P

Photon Flinger

Well-Known Member
Rahz said:
Per square foot. People often refer to watts per square foot, but that will also include all the waste heat generated. Par watts per square foot is a more direct indicator of radiant intensity. As you have noted it doesn't take into account the spectrum or optical considerations, but that doesn't skew the results enough to keep it from being useful.
Click to expand...

What does PAR watts mean? Is it even relevant to growing? (just following up to continue the discussion, not being critical)

Plants are photon counters. From research, we know there are 2 systems, PSI and PSII, that use 680 and 700nm photons. The plant has to condition photons of shorter wavelengths to 680 and 700nm in order to use the photons. This is done by reducing the energy of the photon with the energy typically wasted as heat.

PAR watts includes any photons that fall in the PAR range for an amount of power. It doesn't include the SPD so there is no idea of how many photons are created by the light source. They could be mostly blue, meaning a lower count of photons, that carry a lot of energy that is wasted when the plant has to condition those photons.

White LEDs work because the majority of photons created are in the high wavelengths. More red the better. Those hitting their plants with 3500k CCT on up past 6000k CCT are just making their plants work more for less.

Higher CRI results in more red photons. Less heat for the plant to manage. So far my Vero 29 3000K CCT 80/90 trials have shown me that the higher CRI is much better for growing.
 
Rahz

Rahz

Well-Known Member
I've switched from 80 to 90 CRI myself.

PAR wattage doesn't factor in the SPD so it's not going to give an exact photon count but it will provide a ballpark figure.

25 PAR watts of 3000K 90CRI will provide around 125 PPF.
25 PAR watts of 3000K 80CRI will provide around 115 PPF.

Around 8% difference, would yield +1300 and +1200 PPFD respectfully. At 20 PAR watts the PPFD will be closer to 1000, 15 watts 750-800 and so on. It's not perfect, but not bad either and if you know the umol/j you can quickly determine the flux and convert to density.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top