eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
[video=youtube;Pzd7ReqiQnE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pzd7ReqiQnE[/video]
...holy, cool.
...holy, cool.
...that's cool. Just recently, I heard of art as being a vehicle, with science the internal (measurable / measured) parts of the mechanism. In plain terms, art is expressed through science. If it didn't have those mechanics, it couldn't be assembled and made to work.Different ways of knowing the same objective knowledge
This reminds me of something I hear in the art business quite a bit..
"it doesn't matter how you get to the final product, that doesn't matter, what matters is that you end up with a product you can sell"
meaning, there are a million different ways to create art (perceive knowledge), nobody cares how you get to the final result (truth) as long as you get there (reality).
I've interacted with different people who believe this means something like our experiences create our own subjective reality, and both of them are equally as valid in regards to truth, which I don't believe is actually true. If it were, you could say ghosts were just as real as dogs, and me saying otherwise would hold no bearing on your reality.
I think the only reality that really matters, especially when you are trying to discover what is true, is that which can be measured. That is the key. If we can't measure it, how can we know where it falls on the plane between objective and subjective?
To me, this is why science will always reign supreme, it's a tool used to elevate simple belief in something to actual truth.
fucking sick!in depth story of daniel.
[video=youtube;kf3-el-djaw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kf3-el-djaw[/video]
i like the part where he meets kim peek. (rainman)
Different ways of knowing the same objective knowledge
This reminds me of something I hear in the art business quite a bit..
"it doesn't matter how you get to the final product, that doesn't matter, what matters is that you end up with a product you can sell"
meaning, there are a million different ways to create art (perceive knowledge), nobody cares how you get to the final result (truth) as long as you get there (reality).
I've interacted with different people who believe this means something like our experiences create our own subjective reality, and both of them are equally as valid in regards to truth, which I don't believe is actually true. If it were, you could say ghosts were just as real as dogs, and me saying otherwise would hold no bearing on your reality.
I think the only reality that really matters, especially when you are trying to discover what is true, is that which can be measured. That is the key. If we can't measure it, how can we know where it falls on the plane between objective and subjective?
To me, this is why science will always reign supreme, it's a tool used to elevate simple belief in something to actual truth.
I think you misunderstoodBut, but, me saying so, holds no bearing on YOUR reality......so, it IS acurate. It seems the only truth, to you, is yours....which is exactly what you say you do not believe in. Truly you have a dizzying intellect.