We the Sheeple do not believe in any conspiracies, those conspiracy people are crazy.

Status
Not open for further replies.

kendothegreenwizard

Active Member
We the sheeple would never accept that the gov't would ever do anything to hurt the people they are dutied to protect.
We the Sheeple do not believe in any consiracies and even those that are proven are just from crazy people.


We the Sheeple believe the Gov't would never flood our streets with cocaine, or or buy arms from our enemies to further their south American Agenda.
The Iran-Contra Affair: In 1985 and '86, the White House authorized government officials to secretly trade weapons with the Israeli government that were then secretly traded with Iran in exchange for the release of U.S. hostages held in Iran. The funds from the trades were then used to help finance the illegal war in Nicaragua. The plot was uncovered by Congress in 1987. The documentary series, Core of Corruption, will be exploring details on the Iran Contra conspiracy in greater detail. The series if 5 seperate films written and directed by Jonathan Elinoff, investigative journalist and reporter for the New World Order Report. During Iran Contra, drug smuggling by the CIA was uncovered and to this day the United States population is largely unaware of the findings of this information. Both posts on CIA drug running in this article of 33 conspiracies that turned out to be true are about this very topic of drug running during Iran Contra.

We the Sheeple would never accept a conspiracy that involved A multinational bank that was in good standing.
The BCCI Scandal: The Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) was a major international bank founded in 1972 by Agha Hasan Abedi, a Pakistani financier. The Bank was registered in Luxembourg. Within a decade BCCI touched its peak, it operated in 78 countries, had over 400 branches, and had assets in excess of US$ 20 billion making it the 7th largest private bank in the world by assets. In the late 1980's BCCI became the target of a two year undercover operation conducted by the US Customs Service. This operation concluded with a fake wedding that was attended by BCCI officers and drug dealers from around the world who had established a personal friendship and working relationship with undercover Special Agent Robert Mazur. After a six month trial in Tampa, key bank officers were convicted and received lengthy prison sentences. Bank officers began cooperating with law enforcement authorities and that cooperation caused BCCI’s many crimes to be revealed. BCCI came under the scrutiny of regulatory bodies and intelligence agencies in the 1980s due to its perceived avoidance of falling under one regulatory banking authority, a fact that was later, after extensive investigations, proven to be false. BCCI became the focus of a massive regulatory battle in 1991 and was described as a "$20-billion-plus heist". Investigators in the U.S. and the UK revealed that BCCI had been "set up deliberately to avoid centralized regulatory review, and operated extensively in bank secrecy jurisdictions. Its affairs were extraordinarily complex. Its officers were sophisticated international bankers whose apparent objective was to keep their affairs secret, to commit fraud on a massive scale, and to avoid detection."


We the Sheeple would never believe that the CIA would stand by idley while the Puppet regime we installed flooded the streets of LA with Cocaine to finance their war of aggression against a legitimately elected gov't.

CIA Drug Running in LA: Pulitzer Prize Award winning journalist Gary Webb exposed this alongside LAPD Narcotics Officer turned whislteblower and author Michael Ruppert, CIA Contract Pilot Terry Reed, and many others. In August 1996 the San Jose Mercury News published Webb's "Dark Alliance", a 20,000 word, three-part investigative series which alleged that Nicaraguan drug traffickers had sold and distributed crack cocaine in Los Angeles during the 1980s, and that drug profits were used to fund the CIA-supported Nicaraguan Contras. Webb never asserted that the CIA directly aided drug dealers to raise money for the Contras, but he did document that the CIA was aware of the cocaine transactions and the large shipments of cocaine into the U.S. by the Contra personnel. "Dark Alliance" received national attention. At the height of the interest, the web version of it on San Jose Mercury News website received 1.3 million hits a day. According to the Columbia Journalism Review, the series became "the most talked-about piece of journalism in 1996 and arguably the most famous—some would say infamous—set of articles of the decade."
Later Gary Webb commited SUICIDE. How convenient for the CIA.

We the Sheeple would never believe that OUr Beloved Gov't would ever, ever plot against peaceful activists and leaders such as Martin Luther King or THe NAACP

Counter Intelligence Programs Against Activists in the 60s:COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert, and often illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at investigating and disrupting dissident political organizations within the United States. The FBI used covert operations from its inception, however formal COINTELPRO operations took place between 1956 and 1971. The FBI's stated motivation at the time was "protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order."According to FBI records, 85% of COINTELPRO resources were expended on infiltrating, disrupting, marginalizing, and/or subverting groups suspected of being subversive, such as communist and socialist organizations; the women's rights movement; militant black nationalist groups, and the non-violent civil rights movement, including individuals such as Martin Luther King, Jr. and others associated with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Congress of Racial Equality, the American Indian Movement, and other civil rights groups; a broad range of organizations labeled "New Left", including Students for a Democratic Society, the National Lawyers Guild, the Weathermen, almost all groups protesting the Vietnam War, and even individual student demonstrators with no group affiliation; and nationalist groups such as those "seeking independence for Puerto Rico." The other 15% of COINTELPRO resources were expended to marginalize and subvert "white hate groups," including the Ku Klux Klan and National States' Rights Party. The directives governing COINTELPRO were issued by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, who ordered FBI agents to "expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize" the activities of these movements and their leaders.

We the Sheeple would never believe that our gov't would lie or produce false evidence to support the move towards war.
1990 Testimony of Nayirah:A 15-year-old girl named “Nayirah” testified before the U.S. Congress that she had seen Iraqi soldiers pulling Kuwaiti babies from incubators, causing them to die. The testimony helped gain major public support for the 1991 Gulf War, but — despite protests that the dispute of this story was itself a conspiracy theory — it was later discovered that the testimony was false. The public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, which was in the employ of Citizens for a Free Kuwait, had arranged the testimony.It turned out that she had taken acting lessons on request of the CIA and was actually the niece of a major politician in Kuwait.Nayirah was later disclosed to be Nayirah al-Sabah, daughter of Saud bin Nasir Al-Sabah, Kuwaiti ambassador to the USA.The Congressional Human Rights Caucus, of which Congressman Tom Lantos was co-chairman, had been responsible for hosting Nurse Nayirah, and thereby popularizing her allegations. When the girl's account was later challenged by independent human rights monitors, Lantos replied, "The notion that any of the witnesses brought to the caucus through the Kuwaiti Embassy would not be credible did not cross my mind... I have no basis for assuming that her story is not true, but the point goes beyond that. If one hypothesizes that the woman's story is fictitious from A to Z, that in no way diminishes the avalanche of human rights violations." Nevertheless, the senior Republican on the Human Rights Caucus, John Edward Porter, responded to the revelations "by saying that if he had known the girl was the ambassador's daughter, he would not have allowed her to testify."

We the Sheeple would never believe that our Gov't would kill people by inaction to experiment on them
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study: The United States Public Health Service carried out this clinical study on 400 poor, African-American men with syphilis from 1932 to 1972. During the study the men were given false and sometimes dangerous treatments, and adequate treatment was intentionally withheld so the agency could learn more about the disease. While the study was initially supposed to last just six months, it continued for 40 years. Close to 200 of the men died from syphilis or related complications by the end of the study.

We the sheeple would never believe that our nedia is a bogus sham and lies to us at every opportunity
Operation Mockingbird: Also in the 1950s to '70s, the CIA paid a number of well-known domestic and foreign journalists (from big-name media outlets like Time, The Washington Post, The New York Times, CBS and others) to publish CIA propaganda. The CIA also reportedly funded at least one movie, the animated "Animal Farm," by George Orwell. The Church Committee finally exposed the activities in 1975.

We the sheeple would never believe that Our Gov't would experiment with dangerous mind control experiments on Americans.
MK-ULTRA: In the 1950s to the 1970s, the CIA ran a mind-control project aimed at finding a "truth serum" to use on communist spies. Test subjects were given LSD and other drugs, often without consent, and some were tortured. At least one man, civilian biochemist Frank Olson, who was working for the government, died as a result of the experiments. The project was finally exposed after investigations by the Rockefeller Commission.
 

iNVESTIGATE

Well-Known Member
hahha.. ..awwe fuck. Made myself sad..



You forgot what could have been 'a big one'..
gladly though we had a man w/ a conscience who never signed off on it...

OPERATION NORTHWOODS

In response to a request for pretexts for military intervention by the Chief of Operations of the Cuba Project, Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the document listed methods, and outlined plans, that the authors believed would garner public and international support for U.S. military intervention in Cuba. These were to be staged attacks purported to be of Cuban origin.
  1. Since it would seem desirable to use legitimate provocation as the basis for US military intervention in Cuba a cover and deception plan, to include requisite preliminary actions such as has been developed in response to Task 33 c, could be executed as an initial effort to provoke Cuban reactions. Harassment plus deceptive actions to convince the Cubans of imminent invasion would be emphasized. Our military posture throughout execution of the plan will allow a rapid change from exercise to intervention if Cuban response justifies.
  2. A series of well coordinated incidents will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces. a. Incidents to establish a credible attack (not in chronological order):
    1. Start rumors (many). Use clandestine radio.
    2. Land friendly Cubans in uniform "over-the-fence" to stage attack on base.
    3. Capture Cuban (friendly) saboteurs inside the base.
    4. Start riots near the base main gate (friendly Cubans).[13]
    5. Blow up ammunition inside the base; start fires.
    6. Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage).
    7. Lob mortar shells from outside of base into base. Some damage to installations.
    8. Capture assault teams approaching from the sea or vicinity of Guantanamo City.
    9. Capture militia group which storms the base.
    10. Sabotage ship in harbor; large fires—napthalene.
    11. Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims (may be in lieu of (10)).
    b. United States would respond by executing offensive operations to secure water and power supplies, destroying artillery and mortar emplacements which threaten the base.c. Commence large scale United States military operations.
  3. A "Remember the Maine" incident could be arranged in several forms: a. We could blow up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba.b. We could blow up a drone (unmanned) vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. We could arrange to cause such incident in the vicinity of Havana or Santiago as a spectacular result of Cuban attack from the air or sea, or both. The presence of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The nearness to Havana or Santiago would add credibility especially to those people that might have heard the blast or have seen the fire. The US could follow up with an air/sea rescue operation covered by US fighters to "evacuate" remaining members of the non-existent crew. Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.
  4. We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington.[14]
    The terror campaign could be pointed at refugees seeking haven in the United States. We could sink a boatload of Cubans en route to Florida (real or simulated). We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized. Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement, also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government.
  5. A "Cuban-based, Castro-supported" filibuster could be simulated against a neighboring Caribbean nation (in the vein of the 14th of June invasion of the Dominican Republic). We know that Castro is backing subversive efforts clandestinely against Haiti, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, and Nicaragua at present and possible others. These efforts can be magnified and additional ones contrived for exposure. For example, advantage can be taken of the sensitivity of the Dominican Air Force to intrusions within their national air space. "Cuban" B-26 or C-46 type aircraft could make cane-burning raids at night. Soviet Bloc incendiaries could be found. This could be coupled with "Cuban" messages to the Communist underground in the Dominican Republic and "Cuban" shipments of arm which would be found, or intercepted, on the beach.
  6. Use of MIG type aircraft by US pilots could provide additional provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping and destruction of US military drone aircraft by MIG type planes would be useful as complementary actions. An F-86 properly painted would convince air passengers that they saw a Cuban MIG, especially if the pilot of the transport were to announce such fact. The primary drawback to this suggestion appears to be the security risk inherent in obtaining or modifying an aircraft. However, reasonable copies of the MIG could be produced from US resources in about three months.[15]
  7. Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft should appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the government of Cuba. Concurrently, genuine defections of Cuban civil and military air and surface craft should be encouraged.
  8. It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight. a. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.b. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will begin transmitting on the international distress frequency a "MAY DAY" message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO radio[16] stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to "sell" the incident.
  9. It is possible to create an incident which will make it appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack. a. Approximately 4 or 5 F-101 aircraft will be dispatched in trail from Homestead AFB, Florida, to the vicinity of Cuba. Their mission will be to reverse course and simulate fakir aircraft for an air defense exercise in southern Florida. These aircraft would conduct variations of these flights at frequent Intervals. Crews would be briefed to remain at least 12 miles off the Cuban coast; however, they would be required to carry live ammunition in the event that hostile actions were taken by the Cuban MIGs.b. On one such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly tail-end Charley at considerable interval between aircraft. While near the Cuban Island this pilot would broadcast that he had been jumped by MIGs and was going down. No other calls would be made. The pilot would then fly directly west at extremely low altitude and land at a secure base, an Eglin auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper people, quickly stored and given a new tail number. The pilot who had performed the mission under an alias, would resume his proper identity and return to his normal place of business. The pilot and aircraft would then have disappeared.c. At precisely the same time that the aircraft was presumably shot down, a submarine or small surface craft would disburse F-101 parts, parachute, etc., at approximately 15 to 20 miles off the Cuban coast and depart. The pilots returning to Homestead would have a true story as far as they knew. Search ships and aircraft could be dispatched and parts of aircraft found.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Not saying that there are not:
We the sheeple would never accept that the gov't would ever do anything to hurt the people they are dutied to protect.
We the Sheeple do not believe in any consiracies and even those that are proven are just from crazy people.
"Sheeple" out there, but you will find most the people on this board are not of the belief that the government does not do some pretty wicked shit to us the people.

All those things are legit, wrong, and some down right evil. And our government did do them, the Tuskegee is one of the most racist and horrific events in our entire history, and it is sick that our government did it. That little blurb doesn't even touch on the fact they let the syphilis infected people to go home and they passed it to wives and children and they kept them from getting the simple injections that would have rid the virus. But with happening for over 30 years there is only so much you can cover in a paragraph.

But things like the Fed being some mechanism of evil, or that somehow banks forced us to bury ourselves in debt, or that even though we have the lowest taxes in our memories they are somehow taking more from us. Not to mention communist plots of Obama to take over the US, Birth Certificates, 9/11 being a government plot.

See the issue I have with the stuff that gets written is that most the time it is that it clouds what is actually happening. Like the Attorney General that got fired for not dropping the Sacramento mayor investigation. That is a real legit issue, but it got crowded out by Birth certificate nonsense and tea party crazies, and Obama wanting to take everyones guns (when he has infact expanded gun rights more than any of the last 5 presidents).

You may call us sheeple, and sometimes I am sure that we are. But if you stick to shit that is actually supported by more than half quotes taken out of context, loose connections to people with quotes about weird shit they believed in college (when everyone is learning about new viewpoints), and outright lies, we will not have anything to be able to counter you with, and you will win.

But instead we have to look at posts made about things that most of you did not think of, and are just cut and paste jobs from the favorite blog of the day. And the people that post them believe that they are somehow pure gold and cannot possibly be wrong, because they are backed up by some other blog post/article that uses the tactics I listed above. And when we dig a little more and find the full quote and post it, it does nothing to sway the opinion of the person who wrote it, because their mind already made it true, and they never bothered to fact check their own shit.

And the reason I know this, is because I was guilty of it. I used to swallow this shit hook line and sinker about Bush, and it was mostly all garbage too. So much that at this point I am not sure what he did that may have actually hurt us, and what he did that actually helped us without factchecking his entire presidency.


"I want the truth!"
"You can't handle the truth" ..Because it is far more boring and complex and makes for piss poor blogging and television because it takes a long ass time to get to what actually happened.
 

jimmy130380

Well-Known Member
what about the 3rd building (world trade building) that just fell down in the 9/11 attack on freedom
 

abe23

Active Member
Thank you hanimal for stating the obvious injecting some reason into the discussion....

The thing is that the morons who obsess about birth certificates, 9/11 'truth', new world orders and all the other bullshit miss the very real conspiracies that are happening right under their noses. The fact that in our system money buys corporate interests access to power doesn't seem to bother any of them. The fact that industries are allowed to write legislation that is supposed to regulate them doesn't seem to be an issue either. Companies that make money by passing on the hidden costs to the environment and our health to us consumers (BP and monsanto seem like good targets for paranoia...) don't really seem to bother the conspiracy crowd all that much.

I would say that makes them the biggest sheeple of all...
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
Thank you hanimal for stating the obvious injecting some reason into the discussion....

The thing is that the morons who obsess about birth certificates, 9/11 'truth', new world orders and all the other bullshit miss the very real conspiracies that are happening right under their noses. The fact that in our system money buys corporate interests access to power doesn't seem to bother any of them. The fact that industries are allowed to write legislation that is supposed to regulate them doesn't seem to be an issue either. Companies that make money by passing on the hidden costs to the environment and our health to us consumers (BP and monsanto seem like good targets for paranoia...) don't really seem to bother the conspiracy crowd all that much.

I would say that makes them the biggest sheeple of all...

they only care about the things they can't change or prove. that way they don't have to do anything. they can just sit back and type away. never having to even get off the couch. :wink:
 

iNVESTIGATE

Well-Known Member
Well your opinions on this do differ from mine...

BUT, IT DOESNT FUCKING MATTER WHAT YOU THINK OF THE HISTORICAL FACTS WE HAVE PLACED INFRONT OF YOU. They're facts. They have no feeling's. And they dont care about your fucking petty thought's. i would totally try to and attempt to make you feel lesser than me and maybe it would work and i could feel good about how i helped other people see how stupid you are. ORRRR maybe you could actually list what we were posting that YOU THINK is wrong..



And regarding September 11th, 2001. The inconsistencies with the Official Report are insurmountable. And NOT EVERYONE in the 9/11 Truth movement belive that the Government was complicit.

The bulk of the accredited & intelligible people who support A TRULY INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION into 9/11/01 just want a full subpoena powered investigation. And don't actually speculate or like to fall into a bottomless pit of conspiracies..

What did you want to start with? How Bush appointed H. Kissinger (a known practitioner of the strategic lie) to the 911 Commission in the first two weeks but soon declined because it would be bad for business to openly reveal his client's.


Next they went to Thomas Kean. Someone a little less known. But still with major conflict's of interest's.. he was director and co-owner of Amerada Hess a company that held and maintained a partnership with Delta Oil of Saudia Arabia. He would also accept a deal made by the White House/P.Zelikow which limited the Commissions access to White House documents. Documents concerning the advance warnings of a terror attack.

Lee Hamilton, Kean's Vice-chair who had a spot on the Iran/Contra committee. Who had the chance but decided not to indict Reagan/Bush even though a wealth of evidence
was produced to verify that they had both authorized illegally obtained weapons be shipped to Iran.

Bush and Cheney would also speak with the Commission. But ONLY if they were together and no notes were taken and they could moderate the question's....


And then there is the fact that it took dozens of people (9/11 victim's family members(FamilySteeringCommitee)) to MAKE the Bush Administration finally start up the 9/11 Commission. And a year later after months of lobbying from the FSC the BushAdmin. would decide not to object to a independent investigation any longer and setup 'n structure an exact opposite commission.. WTF!?

And once they did start an investigation a couple of the comssioners who were to take up the duty of reviewing the limited evidence said they wanted nothing to do with another Warren commision. Max Cleland stated "Im not going to be part of looking at information partially.. to be part of political pressure to do this or that."


Just because you do not wish to partake in this fight doenst mean you have to fight against us.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
I love when young college students jump in the discussion, they know so little yet think they know so much. They don't let little things like FACTS get in the way either. They blame corporations and rich people for everything and worship the government gods put before them.

The biggest conspiracy is the monetary system we have.

Lets not forget about all the lies we tell to get Wars started either. WWI, WWII, and Vietnam were all designed to get the USA into a war. The Lusitania, the Attack on Pearl Harbor, and the Tonkin Gulf incident would have never happened if it weren't for a US CONSPIRACY!!!

Good luck posting about 911, I think the Post gets deleted and you receive an infraction for insulting someone. There used to be a FABULOUS 911 post that was 2000 pages long and had more info than you could shake a stick at, but some moderator started banning some of the posters and giving infractions to others for expressing their opinions.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
I love when young college students jump in the discussion, they know so little yet think they know so much. They don't let little things like FACTS get in the way either. They blame corporations and rich people for everything and worship the government gods put before them.

The biggest conspiracy is the monetary system we have.

Lets not forget about all the lies we tell to get Wars started either. WWI, WWII, and Vietnam were all designed to get the USA into a war. The Lusitania, the Attack on Pearl Harbor, and the Tonkin Gulf incident would have never happened if it weren't for a US CONSPIRACY!!!

Good luck posting about 911, I think the Post gets deleted and you receive an infraction for insulting someone. There used to be a FABULOUS 911 post that was 2000 pages long and had more info than you could shake a stick at, but some moderator started banning some of the posters and giving infractions to others for expressing their opinions.
you always forget to mention the gore pictures and repeated warnings. it's always the big mean mod. and yet another conspiracy begins, ..... :roll:
 

kendothegreenwizard

Active Member
Thank you hanimal for stating the obvious injecting some reason into the discussion....

The thing is that the morons who obsess about birth certificates, 9/11 'truth', new world orders and all the other bullshit miss the very real conspiracies that are happening right under their noses. The fact that in our system money buys corporate interests access to power doesn't seem to bother any of them. The fact that industries are allowed to write legislation that is supposed to regulate them doesn't seem to be an issue either. Companies that make money by passing on the hidden costs to the environment and our health to us consumers (BP and monsanto seem like good targets for paranoia...) don't really seem to bother the conspiracy crowd all that much.

I would say that makes them the biggest sheeple of all...
You call people names and act as though you know it all. Only a fool or an idiot out of hand denies any possibilities without merit or call persons who present theories idiots and paranoids.
I personally consider persons like you to be the real enemies of freedom. You would have out of hand and without merit denied each of these conspiracies I presented as machinations of Idiots and paranoids. You even act a though there is some deniability even after these conspiracies have been proven to be true and factual. I say you are blind and a tool. An enemy to freedom and liberty just as those who called the truth seekers who proved these conspiraciers to be fact. Gary Webb was vilified by persons like you. Persons who called him paranoid and destroyed his carreer because they were too ignorant and blind to consider the possibilities of his story.
 

Mr.KushMan

Well-Known Member
You call people names and act as though you know it all. Only a fool or an idiot out of hand denies any possibilities without merit or call persons who present theories idiots and paranoids.
I personally consider persons like you to be the real enemies of freedom. You would have out of hand and without merit denied each of these conspiracies I presented as machinations of Idiots and paranoids. You even act a though there is some deniability even after these conspiracies have been proven to be true and factual. I say you are blind and a tool. An enemy to freedom and liberty just as those who called the truth seekers who proved these conspiraciers to be fact. Gary Webb was vilified by persons like you. Persons who called him paranoid and destroyed his carreer because they were too ignorant and blind to consider the possibilities of his story.
What are you talking about?!?!?

He said that the small conspiracies, like 9/11, are overshadowing the real NWO and banking conspiracies for certain people, in his words "morons". And I agree, some people think all the small conspiracies are not related. I believe it all ties together, NWO, illuminati, nazi's, federal reserve, 9/11, drug prohibition, UN, ect. ect.

The idea for the left-right political spectrum was devised by an economist as a way to adapt divide and conquer. It creates that image that Bill Hicks so eloquently described, "I like the puppet on the left. Well I think the puppet on the right is more to my liking. Wait one guy is holding both puppets!"

Also "round table conventions" are a way to get compartments of an organization together, and get them to unwittingly change their views on a subject. Literally being brainwashed from the inside out.

Peace
 

kendothegreenwizard

Active Member
What are you talking about?!?!?

He said that the small conspiracies, like 9/11, are overshadowing the real NWO and banking conspiracies for certain people, in his words "morons". And I agree, some people think all the small conspiracies are not related. I believe it all ties together, NWO, illuminati, nazi's, federal reserve, 9/11, drug prohibition, UN, ect. ect.

The idea for the left-right political spectrum was devised by an economist as a way to adapt divide and conquer. It creates that image that Bill Hicks so eloquently described, "I like the puppet on the left. Well I think the puppet on the right is more to my liking. Wait one guy is holding both puppets!"

Also "round table conventions" are a way to get compartments of an organization together, and get them to unwittingly change their views on a subject. Literally being brainwashed from the inside out.

Peace
You really need to read the response CAREFULLY before you respond. He said ,"The thing is that the morons who obsess about birth certificates, 9/11 'truth', new world orders and all the other bullshit miss the very real conspiracies that are happening right under their noses."
You are way off base and might want to step back and think about it before you take another hit off the bong.
 

kendothegreenwizard

Active Member
And now that we have established that you are way to high to be debating. I will move on to the 9/11 and NWO and shadow goverment theories.
If in fact 9/11 is even remotely a conspiracy it is the most vile of all and could only be perpetrated by a shadow gov't ran by the perpetrators of NWO.
How can anyone could 9/11 a small conspiracy is far beyond any reasonable logic. REALLY!!!!!!

The 9/11 conspiarcy theory is something I am very concerned with. I don't know if it is a conspiracy or not but there are so many aspects of it that make me wonder. There are so many compelling aspects such as 1,000's of engineers and my own eyes that say these buildings could not have all fallen so perfectly. The perfectly sheared pillars, the missing plane parts at the pentagon, the stand down orders from the DoD,etc,etc,etc.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
personal attacks and insults will not be tolerated and if they continue i will simply close this thread.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
What are you talking about?!?!?

He said that the small conspiracies, like 9/11, are overshadowing the real NWO and banking conspiracies for certain people, in his words "morons". And I agree, some people think all the small conspiracies are not related. I believe it all ties together, NWO, illuminati, nazi's, federal reserve, 9/11, drug prohibition, UN, ect. ect.

The idea for the left-right political spectrum was devised by an economist as a way to adapt divide and conquer. It creates that image that Bill Hicks so eloquently described, "I like the puppet on the left. Well I think the puppet on the right is more to my liking. Wait one guy is holding both puppets!"

Also "round table conventions" are a way to get compartments of an organization together, and get them to unwittingly change their views on a subject. Literally being brainwashed from the inside out.

Peace
Great post man, I'm pretty much in agreement with you and Abe.

kendo, the 911 conspiracy is just a small piece of the big picture. Everything ties together and everything is a distraction, the goal is money and power, imo, the federal reserve is the coup de tat and all the other ones originate from this one.
 

kendothegreenwizard

Active Member
Originally Posted by abe23
Thank you hanimal for stating the obvious injecting some reason into the discussion....

The thing is that the morons who obsess about birth certificates, 9/11 'truth', new world orders and all the other bullshit miss the very real conspiracies that are happening right under their noses. The fact that in our system money buys corporate interests access to power doesn't seem to bother any of them. The fact that industries are allowed to write legislation that is supposed to regulate them doesn't seem to be an issue either. Companies that make money by passing on the hidden costs to the environment and our health to us consumers (BP and monsanto seem like good targets for paranoia...) don't really seem to bother the conspiracy crowd all that much.

I would say that makes them the biggest sheeple of all...




Originally Posted by fdd2blk
they only care about the things they can't change or prove. that way they don't have to do anything. they can just sit back and type away. never having to even get off the couch. :wink:

So lets get this right. You agree with Abe23 so its ok for him to call people idiots and morons and personally attack othrs.. But those who you disagree with are not allowed to call names and personally attack in kind?
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by abe23
Thank you hanimal for stating the obvious injecting some reason into the discussion....

The thing is that the morons who obsess about birth certificates, 9/11 'truth', new world orders and all the other bullshit miss the very real conspiracies that are happening right under their noses. The fact that in our system money buys corporate interests access to power doesn't seem to bother any of them. The fact that industries are allowed to write legislation that is supposed to regulate them doesn't seem to be an issue either. Companies that make money by passing on the hidden costs to the environment and our health to us consumers (BP and monsanto seem like good targets for paranoia...) don't really seem to bother the conspiracy crowd all that much.

I would say that makes them the biggest sheeple of all...




Originally Posted by fdd2blk
they only care about the things they can't change or prove. that way they don't have to do anything. they can just sit back and type away. never having to even get off the couch. :wink:

So lets get this right. You agree with Abe23 so its ok for him to call people idiots and morons and personally attack othrs.. But those who you disagree with are not allowed to call names and personally attack in kind?

there is a difference in a generalized statement and naming names. do you need me to explain it?

i'm not disagreeing or taking sides. i see this thread headed in a name calling direction. can't we just nip it in the bud so i don't HAVE to close it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top