White House Spokesman Predicts More Federal Action Against Marijuana

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
The Justice Department may step up enforcement of federal marijuana laws in states that have voted to legalize its recreational use, according to White House press secretary Sean Spicer.

"I do believe think you'll see greater enforcement of it," Spicer said, during his daily press briefing. He added that the Department of Justice will be looking into the issue further.

Spicer's comments offer an indication of how the Trump administration may approach the nation's fast-growing cannabis industry. New Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been less direct when asked about marijuana, saying during his confirmation hearings that he would "review and evaluate" existing policies.

Roughly 1 in 5 Americans now live in a state where non-medical marijuana is legal for adults and that number may be growing. Lawmakers in Maryland have recently proposed bills allowing recreational use. Medical use of cannabis is allowed in 28 states and the District of Columbia.

Spicer differentiated between medical and recreational use of the plant, saying Trump "understands the pain and suffering that many people go through who are facing especially terminal diseases and the comfort that some of these drugs, including medical marijuana can bring them."

Recreational marijuana, he said, is a "very, very different subject."

The majority of Americans support marijuana legalization, according to a new poll by Quinnipiac University. It also found that 71 percent of voters believe the government should not enforce federal laws against marijuana in states that have legalized it.

"The vast majority of Americans agree that the federal government has no business interfering in state marijuana laws," said Mason Tvert, the communications director for the Marijuana Policy Project, in a statement. "This administration is claiming that it values states' rights, so we hope they will respect the rights of states to determine their own marijuana policies."


Politics
From Glitter To Free Joints, Trump Protesters Plan To Get Their Message Out

There has been a growing uncertainty in the multibillion-dollar marijuana industry about how the Trump administration would approach enforcement of federal drug laws.

Regulated marijuana sales totaled $6.7 billion in 2016, according to Arcview Market Research, and it's projected to grow to an estimated $20.2 billion by 2021. But marijuana is still illegal under federal law. The industry has been growing under the auspices of the so-called Cole Memo, put in place by the Obama administration in 2013. That memo said federal prosecutors would not intervene in state's marijuana laws as long as cannabis didn't cross state lines and the states followed a set of guidelines.

There's been concern since the election that Trump could move to undo that memo. As a candidate, Trump said that recreational marijuana should be a state issue. Attorney General Sessions has said as early as last year that "good people don't smoke pot."

Washington state's attorney general, Bob Ferguson, who led the lawsuit against Trump's travel ban, has already said that he would oppose any moves by the administration to interfere with his state's marijuana laws. In a letter to Sessions, he wrote: "My office will use every tool at our disposal to ensure that the federal government does not undermine Washington's successful, unified system for regulation recreational and medical marijuana."
 

chemphlegm

Well-Known Member
Recreational marijuana users so stoned they believed in Trump?:grin: I doubt he throws them under the bus, what about the next presidential vote, thats his job as a politician now, to get voted into office once again.>:(
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
Officials in legal pot state vow to fight federal crackdown
WASHINGTON — Officials in Washington state, where recreational marijuana is legal, vow to fight any federal crackdown on the nascent industry after White House spokesman Sean Spicer said they should expect to see stepped-up enforcement of anti-pot laws.

Bob Ferguson, attorney general in Washington state, which joined Colorado in 2012 as the first states to legalize recreational use of the drug, said he requested a meeting last week with Attorney General Jeff Sessions about his approach to legal, regulated marijuana.

"We will resist any efforts to thwart the will of the voters in Washington," Ferguson said Thursday.

The comments came shortly after Spicer offered the Trump administration's strongest indication to date of a looming crackdown on recreational pot, saying "I do believe you'll see greater enforcement" of federal law. But, speaking in response to a question at a news conference, he offered no details about what such enforcement would entail.

President Donald Trump does not oppose medical marijuana, Spicer added, but "that's very different than recreational use, which is something the Department of Justice will be further looking into."

A renewed focus on recreational marijuana in states that have legalized pot would present a departure from the Trump administration's statements in favour of states' rights. A day earlier, the administration announced that the issue of transgender student bathroom access was best left to states and local communities to decide.

Enforcement would also shift away from marijuana policy under the Obama administration, which said in a 2013 memo that it would not intervene in states' marijuana laws as long as they keep the drug from crossing state lines and away from children and drug cartels.

But the memo carried no force of law and could be rewritten by Sessions, who has consistently said he opposes legal marijuana but has not indicated what he might do.

Eight states and Washington, D.C., have legalized marijuana for recreational use. The Justice Department has several options available should it decide to enforce the law, including filing lawsuits on the grounds that state laws regulating pot are unconstitutional because they are pre-empted by federal law. Enforcement could also be as simple as directing U.S. attorneys to send letters to recreational marijuana businesses letting them know they are breaking the law.

Kevin Sabet, head of the anti-marijuana group Smart Approaches to Marijuana, said pot enforcement is a matter of public safety.

"The current situation is unsustainable," he said in a statement. "This isn't an issue about states' rights, it's an issue of public health and safety for communities."

Washington Gov. Jay Inslee and Ferguson, the state's attorney general, sent a letter last week to Sessions asking to discuss the issue and laying out the state's arguments for keeping its regulated market in place.

"Our state's efforts to regulate the sale of marijuana are succeeding," they wrote in the letter, which was released Thursday. "A few years ago, the illegal trafficking of marijuana lined the pockets of criminals everywhere. Now, in our state, illegal trafficking activity is being displaced by a closely regulated marijuana industry that pays hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes. This frees up significant law enforcement resources to protect our communities in other, more pressing ways."

In Washington state, sales at licensed pot shops now average nearly $4.4 million per day — with little evidence of any negative societal effects. That's close to $1 billion in sales so far for the fiscal year that began last July, some $184 million of which is state tax revenue.

Spicer's comments came the same day a Quinnipiac poll said 59 per cent of Americans think marijuana should be legal and 71 per cent would oppose a federal crackdown.

In Pueblo, Colorado, legal marijuana has helped fund college scholarships, parks, jail improvements and school drug prevention programs, County Commissioner Sal Pace said.

"Most Americans agree on this issue; let the states decide," Pace said.

States have been flouting the U.S. Controlled Substances Act since at least 1996, when California voters approved marijuana for sick people, a direct conflict with federal guidelines barring the use of marijuana for medical purposes.

And presidents since Bill Clinton have said the federal government unequivocally rejects a state's ability to modify federal drug law.

However, three presidents over the last 20 years have each concluded that the limited resources of the Justice Department are best spent pursuing large drug cartels, not individual users of marijuana.

Nevada state Senate Majority Leader Aaron Ford said in a statement Thursday that meddling in recreational pot laws would be federal overreach and harm state coffers that fund education.

__

Associated Press writers Kristen Wyatt in Denver and Gene Johnson in Seattle contributed to this report.

Sadie Gurman, The Associated Press
 

CalyxCrusher

Well-Known Member
It could work in our favour by shifting the 'pot tourism' market from Colorado to BC or Toronto. That's a YUUGE market. Bigly massive, even. lol
Or we get a sudden influx of ppl claiming refugee status do to a perceived possible persecution based on no facts......oh wait
 

dienowk

Well-Known Member
I was amused by his comments but everyone had to know this was coming.. Sessions never hid how much he hates cannabis and he is now in charge of the department of justice, a crack down on rec cannabis was obvious.
 

torontomeds

Well-Known Member
Also is it a prediction if it is coming from the horses mouth....
I predicted that trump would go after Cannabis, I said it to D man and a few others months ago. I said he would use it as a means to take money, property etc etc....
His move to reinstate asset forfeiture shows they are gearing up to take down the industry.
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
Unless of course they threaten us to not go forward "Or else"
Or else what? That argument is dead, we will not have our laws dictated by a raving lunatic dictator in Washington. Even the legal states are fighting the nutcase. He has enough to worry about at home.
 

Chunky Stool

Well-Known Member
Also is it a prediction if it is coming from the horses mouth....
I predicted that trump would go after Cannabis, I said it to D man and a few others months ago. I said he would use it as a means to take money, property etc etc....
His move to reinstate asset forfeiture shows they are gearing up to take down the industry.
And how can you defend yourself in court if you've been stripped of all your assets? No money = very limited legal defense, if any.
 

Aliquot

Active Member
I really doubt the US federal government has enough resources to actually go after the rec market. Anyone been to washington lately? gonna be more dispensaries than DEA agents soon...
 

Chunky Stool

Well-Known Member
I really doubt the US federal government has enough resources to actually go after the rec market. Anyone been to washington lately? gonna be more dispensaries than DEA agents soon...
They can print more money.
So much for the federal hiring freeze! They just hired a shitload of ICE agents, and now they're going to pour money into the DEA???
Fucking idiots.
 

torontomeds

Well-Known Member
Some of you are so blind, if he can use the army to round up immigrants, what makes you think that he will not do the same for Cannabis companies?
 

torontomeds

Well-Known Member
He has already told Justin that we are week and have a shitty armed force, he told him we need to spend more to be fair to the usa for all they spend to "defend the world" so if he thinks we are week why not come at us?
Anyways no need to speculate, they just admitted they will be going after Cannabis.

If any of you think Trump gives a flying fuck about what the masses want you are very much lost, he only gives a fuck about the last man in his ear, did none of you watch the video when trump reinstated asset forfeiture?
Some old dinosaur from 400 years ago was like " Mr Trump, we need money and I want to take it from the bad guys" Trump "Money, bad guys, um-mm yeah lets do that, bring it back"

If I was invested in Cannabis in the USA I would be very nervous at the moment. DEA 2.0......
 

torontomeds

Well-Known Member
The other thing is the USA is now back in bed with Israel, they have been collecting lots of strains and genetics from the states for the Gov run program. I would not see it being far fetched for them to now put pressure to destroy strains from the masses for the purpose of controlling it all.
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
The other thing is the USA is now back in bed with Israel, they have been collecting lots of strains and genetics from the states for the Gov run program. I would not see it being far fetched for them to now put pressure to destroy strains from the masses for the purpose of controlling it all.
I like your posts...but I think you are reading too much into the ability of the Trump dictatorship to affect foreign law. America has become a laughing stock and is losing influence by the hour...nobody cares what Trump thinks. Holland just announces legalization of cannabis cultivation...is Trump going after the EU too? His only ally is Russia at the moment.
 
Top