eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
How does it exclude spirit? Read a bit about this fellow: Lemaître
(Lemaître translates to "Teacher" or "Master")
Why do you reject the theory of evolution?
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
(Lemaître translates to "Teacher" or "Master")
Zaehet Strife
Well-Known Member
Riiiight, because there are fossil records and skeletons in every major museum in the country...
Absolutely no evidence of "aquatic humanoids" has ever been documented. Oh but we are in the real word, with gullible people, who believe in things just because they want to. Silly human animals, always goin around making stuff up to make them feel better...lol!
burgertime2010
Well-Known Member
First, spirit must be proven to exist.
eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
And should also be proven not to exist, to be fair
Regardless of the proof of it, those who feel it is there are equally apt to study the mechanics of it. Theories grow from all kinds of fields
eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
Yikes, that's harsh.Riiiight, because there are fossil records and skeletons in every major museum in the country...
Absolutely no evidence of "aquatic humanoids" has ever been documented. Oh but we are in the real word, with gullible people, who believe in things just because they want to. Silly human animals, always goin around making stuff up to make them feel better...lol!
Strife, they represent something on a deeper level. (water, deeper, see?) Some people get in touch with their inner world and can only describe what they see there. You like your outer world and describe it as you see it.
There is not right or wrong here, sorry.
burgertime2010
Well-Known Member
Ok, try and understand that theology or spirituality is dedicated to the spirit and my personal relationship to that is not relevant to evolution. Evolution is a science. Science is observable, repeatable, and is not concerned with adding variables (spirit) that are inconclusive. Science is the pursuit of truth, it has rigid guidelines, it needs to be shown. I don't know what you are asking but my suggestion is to leave the disciplines to exist independent of the other. Evolution applies to microbes, animals, and men as well.And should also be proven not to exist, to be fair
Regardless of the proof of it, those who feel it is there are equally apt to study the mechanics of it. Theories grow from all kinds of fields
eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
I think this is where we might differ. Science is a tool that can illustrate the hidden mechanics of nature. Evolution is not a science in itself. Perhaps science was born of evolution, out of necessity to help the human condition?
Kanaplya
Member
Jesus Christ didn't say that, lol, it's a Chinese proverb...
burgertime2010
Well-Known Member
Among 95 percent of scientists believe evolution to be a fact. Science is a defined term. There is no latitude here, perhaps science was an evolutionary trait....it does not make a difference. You wanting evolution to be something does not change data. You need to look up science and evolution.
eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
Who is trying to change data? You setting something up to knock it down does not make it valid - lol I have yet to even mention data.
Balls deep into science here, but with belief I suppose it is invalid? Wipe all believers from the books of science and do you have any cogent arguments left? The honest answer is no.
burgertime2010
Well-Known Member
Data is what makes evolution a science, so ignoring it is not an option for science of any form? Believe what you will, most exceptionally intelligent people today are atheist or agnostic.
eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
And if you can identify them, you are not one of them
thump easy
Well-Known Member
i dont know about evolution could it be that we are rat experiments to a higher power?? could it be that fosills were planted and confusion was puposly implanted, lost civiliations no records??? could it be we are a simulation on a grid??? the smaller you look into a small partical it is thier yet its not??? could it be its all just a projection??? could it be all a test??? could evolution really be evolution???? its crazzy that we just dont know the facts.. to many missing bones to fit the gaps?? what is the real deal??? i dont know man its crazzy if you ask me.. is it all a distraction from the truth???
The only problem I have with evolution is the seemingly HUGE intelligence disparity between our species and every other species on the planet.
Intelligence is obviously important to survival, and yet, ours seems to be the only damn species that focused on intelligence throughout the evolutionary path.
Why?
How did we turn out so completely different from our other primate cousins, when they essentially have the same tools we did back in the day. Why didn't / haven't they developed the simple tools we did to hunt? Why don't they use furs to keep warm in colder climates? Why don't they develop more refined "languages" to communicate?
It just seems odd to me, almost as if we had some kind of "help" along the way by....something?
If intelligence is so important to survival, why isn't it reflected in the evolutionary path of the rest of the animal kingdom?
So while evolution certainly makes sense, IMO, it's only part of the answer.
Intelligence is obviously important to survival, and yet, ours seems to be the only damn species that focused on intelligence throughout the evolutionary path.
Why?
How did we turn out so completely different from our other primate cousins, when they essentially have the same tools we did back in the day. Why didn't / haven't they developed the simple tools we did to hunt? Why don't they use furs to keep warm in colder climates? Why don't they develop more refined "languages" to communicate?
It just seems odd to me, almost as if we had some kind of "help" along the way by....something?
If intelligence is so important to survival, why isn't it reflected in the evolutionary path of the rest of the animal kingdom?
So while evolution certainly makes sense, IMO, it's only part of the answer.
Kanaplya
Member
You have clearly never been to the Deep South...
burgertime2010
Well-Known Member
Are you serious? I am not 160+ IQ and these include Nobel prize winners. That makes no sense BTW. Are u a born-again ball buster? If so, needs work turbo.And if you can identify them, you are not one of them
Kanaplya
Member
While the levels of intelligence between humans and other primates may seem significant (although some of the lower intelligence humans are closer intellectually to upper divisions of primates than their human counterparts) what we do with that intelligence is pretty much the same. We simply have more sophisticated ways of killing each other. That and porn.
theexpress
Well-Known Member
I beleave in evolution.. its funny how we share dna ith lots of different shit on earth.. 98% dna match on chimps.... 70% dna match to sea sponges... 50% dna match to banana trees{wtf} we share 80% dna with cows.... ect. ect. what I don't beleave in is adam and eve... Ill beleave in aleans befor that bullshit
eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
Ah, thanks, but no. Your perspective is a slice of the pie. That goes for all of us humans. Seems as though your quest is to divide, as opposed to make whole. Now we are not even talking about science anymore, just intolerance with a veil of 'data' on it.
