gladstoned
Well-Known Member
I think we are all living under the same law, but we all have very very different LEO. If any one of us dealt with LEO in Escanaba, Detroit, Saginaw, Ann Arbor, and Bloomfield on ANY fucking issue, the results will vary.
Wtf
- Thread starter stumpjumper
- Start date
hunter22375
Well-Known Member
Many forums across the net seem slower recently, including mine (which is a different topic). However, my busy season is gettin ready to start. 
Plus, I have been huntin alot......got my doe already and now waitin on that big buck!
Plus, I have been huntin alot......got my doe already and now waitin on that big buck!
TheMan13
Well-Known Member
I hear ya brother. It's just hard to clarify confusion of elementary civics like the separation of branches within government here. I'm just not sure how I should take individuals questioning my integrity without reason. And then to go on and explain just how confused they are about the point at hand. I do believe it is just my intolerance for such confidence without correctness 
hunter22375
Well-Known Member
Like when people mistake kindness for weakness. I hate that.I hear ya brother. It's just hard to clarify confusion of elementary civics like the separation of branches within government here. I'm just not sure how I should take individuals questioning my integrity without reason. And then to go on and explain just how confused they are about the point at hand. I do believe it is just my intolerance for such confidence without correctness
tomcatjones
Active Member
SO HEY GUYS.
anyone able to cite cases here? or they gonna keep bitching.
PROVOST CASE - AD was used.
over 100s of plants. no cards. first case where unregistered caregiver was used. went free, dismissed, been to his house great guy.
btw.. YOU GUYS NEED TO ASK QUESTIONS, NOT ARGUE.
because then i start to bitch about the lies you perpetuate.
"continuous unaided supply"
anyone able to cite cases here? or they gonna keep bitching.
PROVOST CASE - AD was used.
over 100s of plants. no cards. first case where unregistered caregiver was used. went free, dismissed, been to his house great guy.
btw.. YOU GUYS NEED TO ASK QUESTIONS, NOT ARGUE.
because then i start to bitch about the lies you perpetuate.
"continuous unaided supply"
HomeLessBeans
New Member
any links???
Amateur.Grower
Well-Known Member
- A physician has stated in writing that a patient is likely to receive therapeutic benefit from using marijuana.
- The patient and caregiver were in possession of an amount of marijuana and marijuana plants not more than 'reasonably necessary to ensure the uninterrupted supply' of marijuana to treat the patient.
- The patient or his designated caregiver was engaged in acquiring or growing marijuana for the patient.
tomcatjones
Active Member
http://michiganmedicalmarijuana.org/topic/23775-people-v-provost/
start there.
end here.
http://michiganmedicalmarijuana.org/topic/23775-people-v-provost/page__st__140
...shit we dealt with 2 years ago....
this law is 10 foot tall and bulletproof. only shitty lawyers and people who cant read have bastardized it to make confusing and to make a profit. the cops, the lawyers.
"has stated" ...doesn't even require a signature from a dr. -the law is VERY broad. the cards are voluntary compliance with section 4. the rest is for everyone and that includes NON REGISTERED PEOPLE.
start there.
end here.
http://michiganmedicalmarijuana.org/topic/23775-people-v-provost/page__st__140
...shit we dealt with 2 years ago....
this law is 10 foot tall and bulletproof. only shitty lawyers and people who cant read have bastardized it to make confusing and to make a profit. the cops, the lawyers.
"has stated" ...doesn't even require a signature from a dr. -the law is VERY broad. the cards are voluntary compliance with section 4. the rest is for everyone and that includes NON REGISTERED PEOPLE.
hunter22375
Well-Known Member
LOL....I remember that!
tomcatjones
Active Member
(1) A physician has stated that, in the physician's professional opinion, after having completed a full assessment of the patient's medical history and current medical condition made in the course of a bona fide physician-patient relationship, the patient is likely to receive therapeutic or palliative benefit from the medical use of marihuana to treat or alleviate the patient's serious or debilitating medical condition or symptoms of the patient's serious or debilitating medical condition;
(2) The patient and the patient's primary caregiver, if any, were collectively in possession of a quantity of marihuana that was not more than was reasonably necessary to ensure the uninterrupted availability of marihuana for the purpose of treating or alleviating the patient's serious or debilitating medical condition or symptoms of the patient's serious or debilitating medical condition; and
(3) The patient and the patient's primary caregiver, if any, were engaged in the acquisition, possession, cultivation, manufacture, use, delivery, transfer, or transportation of marihuana or paraphernalia relating to the use of marihuana to treat or alleviate the patient's serious or debilitating medical condition or symptoms of the patient's serious or debilitating medical condition.
Affirmative defense qualifiers....
as copied from the law.
NO WRITING NECESSARY. (hard to prove /shrug) (we just need one doctor to go public in michigan and grant everyone this option of medicine lol)
TheMan13
Well-Known Member
Here is an article from early summer: http://www.freep.com/article/20120601/NEWS06/206010482/Michigan-s-medical-marijuana-law-shields-patients-from-prosecution-Supreme-Court-rules