Zimmerman lawsuit against NBC

desert dude

Well-Known Member
ZIMMERMAN! YAY!!! LULZ.


How much should NBC have to pay George Zimmerman?

Defense attorney fees: $2,000,000

Civil attorney fees: $3,000,000

Loss of income for the rest of Z's life: $40,000/year for 37 years... $1,500,000

Penalty for stirring the pot, damaging race relations, and destroying the life of a private citizen: $10,000,000

bottom line: $16,500,000

The top three are estimates of actual cost. The penalty could (maybe should) be much more. I think a fair penalty for a news organization that behaved as improperly as NBS could be as much as $100,000,000.

Here is a pretty accurate recounting of NBC's bad acts:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/381387/sorry-nbc-you-owe-george-zimmerman-millions-j-delgado
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
ZIMMERMAN! YAY!!! LULZ.


How much should NBC have to pay George Zimmerman?

Defense attorney fees: $2,000,000

Civil attorney fees: $3,000,000

Loss of income for the rest of Z's life: $40,000/year for 37 years... $1,500,000

Penalty for stirring the pot, damaging race relations, and destroying the life of a private citizen: $10,000,000

bottom line: $16,500,000

The top three are estimates of actual cost. The penalty could (maybe should) be much more. I think a fair penalty for a news organization that behaved as improperly as NBS could be as much as $100,000,000.

Here is a pretty accurate recounting of NBC's bad acts:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/381387/sorry-nbc-you-owe-george-zimmerman-millions-j-delgado

why didn't you just post this to the HUGE zimmy thread bucky started?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
let's take a look and break this down..shall we?:lol:

NBC should be held liable for the editing of George Zimmerman’s 911 call in ways that made Zimmerman appear to be a racist.

In a grotesque and apparently malicious act of misreporting, NBC, in multiple broadcasts, aired doctored, heavily edited versions of the 911 call, misleadingly moving around Zimmerman’s words like a Rubik’s Cube. The result gave a false impression of the tragic incident in which Zimmerman shot and killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, and it exposed Zimmerman to the hatred, scorn and contempt of millions of viewers.

Zimmerman is suing NBC and the network is fighting back. But the network’s actions, and its responses to complaints, indicate it willfully and knowingly damaged Zimmerman’s reputation.

This is part of the actual February 26, 2012, conversation between Zimmerman and a police dispatcher:

Dispatcher: Sanford Police Department.

Zimmerman: Hey we’ve had some break-ins in my neighborhood, and there’s a real suspicious guy, uh, it’s Retreat View Circle, um, the best address I can give you is 111 Retreat View Circle. This guy looks like he’s up to no good, or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.

Dispatcher: OK, and this guy is he white, black, or Hispanic?

Zimmerman: He looks black.

Now compare that to what NBC reported on March 19, 2012, deleting the dispatcher’s critical question to make it sound as if Zimmerman both: (a) volunteered that Trayvon was black and, worse yet, (b) said Trayvon was up to no good because he was black. According to NBC’s report, Zimmerman stated:

“He looks like he’s up to no good, he looks black.”

The dispatcher’s key question, asking for Trayvon’s race, curiously wound up on the cutting room floor.

The following day, on March 20, 2012, NBC doubled down, this time via another reporter relaying that Zimmerman had stated,“This guy looks like he’s up to no good or on drugs or something. He’s got his hand in his waistband. And he’s a black male.”

But the actual audio portion, wherein Zimmerman referenced a “black male” later in the call, was as follows, in which he is simply further describing what the dispatcher asked earlier, since the police are on their way:

Dispatcher: That’s the clubhouse, do you know what the- he’s near the clubhouse right now?

Zimmerman: Yeah, now he’s coming towards me.

Dispatcher: OK.

Zimmerman: He’s got his hand in his waistband. And he’s a black male.

It gets worse. The same day, NBC struck again, reporting on NBC Nightly News and the MSNBC website:

Sanford Police say that Zimmerman shot and killed Martin in self-defense, a shooting without racial overtones, no hate crime. But when Zimmerman was calling the police the night Trayvon Martin was killed, he described the victim using a racial epithet.

Just one problem: at no time did Zimmerman use a racial epithet. The actual call went as follows:

Dispatcher: Just let me know if he does anything, ok?

Zimmerman: (unclear) See if you can get an officer over here.

Dispatcher: Yeah we’ve got someone on the way, just let me know if this guy does anything else.

Zimmerman: Okay. These [expletive] they always get away. Yep. When you come to the clubhouse you come straight in and make a left. Actually you would go past the clubhouse.

Dispatcher: So it’s on the lefthand side from the clubhouse?

The expletive is . . . “assh*les,” which wins Zimmerman no accolades from a finishing school but certainly is not indicative of a racist. Elsewhere on the tape, where Zimmerman was alleged by NBC to have muttered “f*cking coons” he, according to every expert, actually said “f*cking punks.”

As Zimmerman’s attorney writes in the complaint against NBC: “The truth, as known to the defendants, was that Zimmerman said ‘f—— punks’ and there was no evidence, or reason to believe, that Zimmerman uttered a racial epithet during the call.”

But wait, there’s more! In two additional March reports (on the 22nd and the 27th), bringing the total to a whopping five, the Peacock Network again brought together the “he’s up to no good” and “he looks black” statements.

The dispatcher’s key question, asking for Trayvon’s race, curiously wound up on the cutting room floor.

The following day, on March 20, 2012, NBC doubled down, this time via another reporter relaying that Zimmerman had stated,“This guy looks like he’s up to no good or on drugs or something. He’s got his hand in his waistband. And he’s a black male.”

But the actual audio portion, wherein Zimmerman referenced a “black male” later in the call, was as follows, in which he is simply further describing what the dispatcher asked earlier, since the police are on their way:

Dispatcher: That’s the clubhouse, do you know what the- he’s near the clubhouse right now?

Zimmerman: Yeah, now he’s coming towards me.

Dispatcher: OK.

Zimmerman: He’s got his hand in his waistband. And he’s a black male.

It gets worse. The same day, NBC struck again, reporting on NBC Nightly News and the MSNBC website:

Sanford Police say that Zimmerman shot and killed Martin in self-defense, a shooting without racial overtones, no hate crime. But when Zimmerman was calling the police the night Trayvon Martin was killed, he described the victim using a racial epithet.

Just one problem: at no time did Zimmerman use a racial epithet.

OH YES HE DID^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
LISTEN TO UNREDACTED 911 CALL BELOW
.

The actual call went as follows:

Dispatcher: Just let me know if he does anything, ok?

Zimmerman: (unclear) See if you can get an officer over here.

Dispatcher: Yeah we’ve got someone on the way, just let me know if this guy does anything else.

Zimmerman: Okay. These [expletive] they always get away. Yep. When you come to the clubhouse you come straight in and make a left. Actually you would go past the clubhouse.

Dispatcher: So it’s on the lefthand side from the clubhouse?

The expletive is . . . “assh*les,” which wins Zimmerman no accolades from a finishing school but certainly is not indicative of a racist. Elsewhere on the tape, where Zimmerman was alleged by NBC to have muttered “f*cking coons” he, according to every expert, actually said “f*cking punks.”

As Zimmerman’s attorney writes in the complaint against NBC: “The truth, as known to the defendants, was that Zimmerman said ‘f—— punks’ and there was no evidence, or reason to believe, that Zimmerman uttered a racial epithet during the call.”

But wait, there’s more! In two additional March reports (on the 22nd and the 27th), bringing the total to a whopping five, the Peacock Network again brought together the “he’s up to no good” and “he looks black” statements.​
 
Last edited:

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Please explain why you think the lawsuit is frivolous?
because he's broke and really reaching..

i wonder who is representing him on contingency?

this is just a game..throw some charges out there in a letter and voila! settle out of court for an undisclosed amount.

one letter = $10k

happens all the time..even i do it.

:mrgreen:
 
Last edited:

desert dude

Well-Known Member
i messed it up..there are just soo many lies to account for..

doesn't travis' post say the suit was thrown out?

:lol:
If you had bothered to read the second page of the article you cut/pasted, you would have seen that Travisw's point was covered.

Did you understand what you read? Did you even read it, or did you just cut/paste and hope the wall of words would make a point that you agreed with?

There were indeed many lies, and they were all from NBC and they were all malicious and willful. That is the point of the law suit.
 

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
If you had bothered to read the second page of the article you cut/pasted, you would have seen that Travisw's point was covered.

Did you understand what you read? Did you even read it, or did you just cut/paste and hope the wall of words would make a point that you agreed with?

There were indeed many lies, and they were all from NBC and they were all malicious and willful. That is the point of the law suit.

She doesn't understand what she posted.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
here you go:

The lawsuit is about NBC's willful lies. Do you think it is appropriate for the news media to lie about a private individual, destroy his/her life and stir up racial animosity that resulted in multiple racially motivated assaults? Is this just par for the course for MSNBC? Is this the liberal game plan for racial comity?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Zimmerman will not get anything. He should go back to painting by numbers.
Zimmerman is a loser being supported by losers. What grown ass man plays cops and ends up getting his ass beat by a kid.
Same group that says how they feel so violated by the government for being nosy and don't want people in their business, are the same group who defends the action of this creepy as guy. Very confusing and telling at he same damn time!!!
I chose carefully the people I defend in life. Zimmerman the loser, wanna be cop, no life having is not one of them.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Zimmerman will not get anything. He should go back to painting by numbers.
Zimmerman is a loser being supported by losers. What grown ass man plays cops and ends up getting his ass beat by a kid.
Same group that says how they feel so violated by the government for being nosy and don't want people in their business, are the same group who defends the action of this creepy as guy. Very confusing and telling at he same damn time!!!
I chose carefully the people I defend in life. Zimmerman the loser, wanna be cop, no life having is not one of them.
So, you support the "right" of a news organization to arbitrarily destroy a private citizen's life and to stoke the fires of racial animosity?
 
Top