Zimmerman Redux

NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
The prosecutor in the Zimmerman case accidentally released some more info (oops) on the case.

The problem is that the photo's prove that Zimmerman had injuries the night of the shooting.

I am sure the Trayvan defenders will feel that Zimmerman's injuries were not severe enough to allow him to protect himself but it is just one more step along the way to a complete acquittal of Zimmerman in the matter.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/09/george-zimmerman-evidence_n_1762383.html?1344554578&ncid=webmail1#slide=990896
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
The prosecutor in the Zimmerman case accidentally released some more info (oops) on the case.

The problem is that the photo's prove that Zimmerman had injuries the night of the shooting.

I am sure the Trayvan defenders will feel that Zimmerman's injuries were not severe enough to allow him to protect himself but it is just one more step along the way to a complete acquittal of Zimmerman in the matter.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/09/george-zimmerman-evidence_n_1762383.html?1344554578&ncid=webmail1#slide=990896
Click to expand...
These things are accidentally done on purpose. It is so that when Zimm is acquitted of the charges they will be able to blame "small mistakes" as being the culprit of them losing the case.
 
BA142

BA142

Well-Known Member
Old news. I still don't buy his story. Probably because the only other witness is dead and Zim has changed his story multiple times.

Does anybody else think he's half retarded? I mean...the guy couldn't even become a cop
 
F

Fresh 2 De@th

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
Can you show me where in the law it says that it is legal to assault and try to kill someone you think is stalking you?
Click to expand...
who said he assumed he was being stalked? in the recordings it clearly show Trayvon was being stalked so where are you going with this? if i am not mistaken the operator told zimmerman not to pursue and they were on their way.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
FlyLikeAnEagle said:
Can you show me where in the law it says that it is legal to stalk someone and kill them?
Click to expand...
No, but there is a law that states you can kill them if they attack you while you are legally walking in a public area of your own neighborhood. Last I checked, this happened near a public sidewalk that Zimmerman had every bit as much right to be using as Martin did, for ANY reason. And what you laughably keep calling "stalking" is just as easily called "observation". Might explain why he isn't charged with stalking.

I still put it at 50/50 on who initiated the violence and the outcome of the trial.
 
FlyLikeAnEagle

FlyLikeAnEagle

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
No, but there is a law that states you can kill them if they attack you while you are legally walking in a public area of your own neighborhood. Last I checked, this happened near a public sidewalk that Zimmerman had every bit as much right to be using as Martin did, for ANY reason. And what you laughably keep calling "stalking" is just as easily called "observation". Might explain why he isn't charged with stalking.
Click to expand...

Yea you're right, he isnt getting charged with stalking, he's getting charged with murder. Hello!
 
Samwell Seed Well

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
The prosecutor in the Zimmerman case accidentally released some more info (oops) on the case.

The problem is that the photo's prove that Zimmerman had injuries the night of the shooting.

I am sure the Trayvan defenders will feel that Zimmerman's injuries were not severe enough to allow him to protect himself but it is just one more step along the way to a complete acquittal of Zimmerman in the matter.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/09/george-zimmerman-evidence_n_1762383.html?1344554578&ncid=webmail1#slide=990896
Click to expand...
id say his injuries would have never been susatined if he had not stalked and confronted Martin, and that he should have never left his car with the mindset that Martin, who in his mind was one of those robbers, was guilty be of a crime so he needed to be followed and persued . .. . that is all

the charge murder 2 is a stretch i think most agree, but negligence involving his martins death imho is where he will be found guilty of something, oh and his story is about as believable and jon beni ramseys parents story so there is that, his video he put out of his recollection of events matched up to witness testimony and his original stories is laughable
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Samwell Seed Well said:
id say his injuries would have never been susatined if he had not stalked and confronted Martin, and that he should have never left his car with the mindset that Martin, who in his mind was one of those robbers, was guilty be of a crime so he needed to be followed and persued . .. . that is all

the charge murder 2 is a stretch i think most agree, but negligence involving his martins death imho
Click to expand...
And Martin's injuries would not have been sustained if he had not assaulted and tried to kill Zimmerman.

Martin was the one who committed a crime first. He paid the ultimate price for it too...
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
And Martin's injuries would not have been sustained if he had not assaulted and tried to kill Zimmerman.

Martin was the one who committed a crime first. He paid the ultimate price for it too...
Click to expand...
YES
In gated communitys
Walking while brown is a serious felony and the punishment is death
 
Samwell Seed Well

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
And Martin's injuries would not have been sustained if he had not assaulted and tried to kill Zimmerman.

Martin was the one who committed a crime first. He paid the ultimate price for it too...
Click to expand...
id bet that delusional paranio is not a excuse to stalk and then confront someone with a deadly weapon and cry wolf when he got more then he could handle, martin is a victim under the SYG law, imho, he had every right to defend himself from his pursuer/ stalker

and you base your opinion that Zimmermans story outside police operator conversation is the truth, which i do not agree with, and if you take his story out of it all you have is medical evidence forensics eye witness and the police phone call where Z was much more worried about stopping Martin , while he walked home, vs protecting anything

Z is a crazy(he tried to lie in court to hide his fiances and make his wife perjure herself, did he really think his calls were not being monitored) Darwin vigilante stalking and killing people based on racial prifiling who are not doing anything wrong

sound legal . . lmfao
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Samwell Seed Well said:
id bet that delusional paranio is not a excuse to stalk and them confront somone with a deadly weapon and you base your opinion that Zimmermans story outside polive operator conversation is the truth, which i do not agree with, and if you take his story out of it all you have is medical evidence forensics eye witness and the police phone call where Z was much more worried about stoping Martin , while he walked home, vs protecting anything but his ego
Click to expand...

Martin had it coming
Those upppity negroes have been sent a warning
Know your place boy
Dont be bringing your skittles and grapeade thru white communitys
Stay with your own kind
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
YES
In gated communitys
Walking while brown is a serious felony and the punishment is death
Click to expand...
Again... Walking while brown is not a crime. Assaulting a person and trying to kill them is a crime.

Is there a reason you choose to distort reality to the point of absurdity to attempt to win a conversation?
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Samwell Seed Well said:
id bet that delusional paranio is not a excuse to stalk and then confront someone with a deadly weapon and cry wolf when he got more then he could handle, martin is a victim under the SYG law, imho, he had every right to defend himself from his pursuer/ stalker

and you base your opinion that Zimmermans story outside police operator conversation is the truth, which i do not agree with, and if you take his story out of it all you have is medical evidence forensics eye witness and the police phone call where Z was much more worried about stopping Martin , while he walked home, vs protecting anything

Z is a crazy(he tried to lie in court to hide his fiances and make his wife perjure herself, did he really think his calls were not being monitored) Darwin vigilante stalking and killing people based on racial prifiling who are not doing anything wrong

sound legal . . lmfao
Click to expand...

You have the fact that Travan Martin attacked George Zimmerman. That has been confirmed by pictures. Pictures demanded by the Travan Martin defenders and now delivered showing that in fact Martin had assaulted Zimmerman and caused serious harm.


Again... Where in the law do you have the right to bodily assault someone for simply following you?
 
Samwell Seed Well

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
You have the fact that Travan Martin attacked George Zimmerman. That has been confirmed by pictures. Pictures demanded by the Travan Martin defenders and now delivered showing that in fact Martin had assaulted Zimmerman and caused serious harm.


Again... Where in the law do you have the right to bodily assault someone for simply following you?
Click to expand...
ya he was standing his ground, once again you think Z's story is correct, i dont . .. . i except that none of us know but Z, his public story is full of holes and he has been caught in numerous lies and recants so, i hardly believe that martin ran from Z twice only to attack Z unprovoked

martin Stood his ground and was killed for it
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
You have the fact that Travan Martin attacked George Zimmerman. That has been confirmed by pictures. Pictures demanded by the Travan Martin defenders and now delivered showing that in fact Martin had assaulted Zimmerman and caused serious harm.


Again... Where in the law do you have the right to bodily assault someone for simply following you?
Click to expand...
Follow me And i will cross the street
if you cross the street and follow me
I will cross the street again
if you cross the street
Im gonna kick your fucking ass
Becuase now you are harassing me
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Follow me And i will cross the street
if you cross the street and follow me
I will cross the street again
if you cross the street
Im gonna kick your fucking ass
Becuase now you are harassing me
Click to expand...
And in the next verse you tragically get killed for that action.

But you are at peace with it knowing your killer might be convicted, might.

Good plan, well thought out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top