Official Lolbertarian thread. Discuss the benefits of No goverment

[Rob Roy]

When an person over the age of 21 has sex with a 13 year old and the child says they agreed to it, does that meet your definition of consent?

No. It lacks information.


When a peaceful person capable of consenting to using their own body is forcibly prevented from doing so, is that your definition of molestation?

Also what other consenting people do, is not my business, even if I don't agree with the things they do. Is it your business to intervene in what other do if you are not involved?

 

[Rob Roy]

Because children cannot give consent to be molested. It's real simple. Was this your defense at your pedophilia trial?

At which age can a person consent to the use of their own body?

Is that age a consistent and universal age for everyone?

Pedo trial? I take that as a "no" on your apology for making false and disparaging comments about me, eh Prohibitionist?

 

[abandonconflict]

 

[Rob Roy]

Hey look a government designed bike!

 

[Not GOP]

Zero emissions, standard equipped teleprompters, and it's easy to turn into a convertable

 

[woody333333]

Hire somebody to arbitrate and facilitate restitution if I can prove I was aggrieved. Except in my world the entity hired would not have a forcibly held monopoly on the resolution of disputes. There would be choices.

If I neglected to answer a question in the past, my apologies.

So, how would you use an entity based in coercion and holding a monopoly on the use of force to prevent coercion from happening?

I won't be meeting w your arbitrator. Now what?

 

[Glaucoma]

When you are done laughing, could you offer any kind of refutation to what I said?

You stated you didn't like the plaintiff choosing the judge, but then couldn't refute it was exactly what happens when government holds the monopoly on justice / arbitration of disputes.

Are you listening to yourself? If this is the problem why the hell would you compound it and act like it's going to make things better? From what I can tell, nothing at all would ever get done. Lets say you win a case against me using your crony arbitrators. I call BS and bring suit against their judgement using my own set of cronies.

Where does it end?

Also, did you read what I had politely asked you to read a few posts back and how would you refute the Jones family analogy offered by Rothbard?

Yes I did. It's an absurd strawman that applies to maybe 100 or less like minded people. The reality is we are each surrounded by millions of people who all have different views and motivations and ideas of morality.

BTW, you ask good questions but seem a little unable to consider any information that contradicts your preconceived notions that what presently exists is the best that can ever be. Lighten up. You have potential if you are open to logic and don't jump back into the cognitive dissonant pool so readily.

I don't believe that what presently exists can't be better, that would be stupid, we obviously have a few issues to work out. No need to junk a car just because it needs a few new parts, though. You would propose we build the entire car out of bad parts and somehow it will just all work itself out.

 

[Glaucoma]

I won't be meeting w your arbitrator. Now what?

I already asked him what happens when he has a grievance against somebody who does not consent to this 'justice system'.

There is still no answer.

 

[woody333333]

I already asked him what happens when he has a grievance against somebody who does not consent to this 'justice system'.

There is still no answer.

Force

Lol

 

[abandonconflict]

 

[Glaucoma]

Force

Lol

Probably why he won't answer.

What if a Canadian shoots his horse? Oh well, I guess.

 

[ChesusRice]

Probably why he won't answer.

What if a Canadian shoots his horse? Oh well, I guess.

He does build monumental straw men.

 

[ChesusRice]

At which age can a person consent to the use of their own body?

Is that age a consistent and universal age for everyone?

Pedo trial? I take that as a "no" on your apology for making false and disparaging comments about me, eh Prohibitionist?

Gee your honor
I didn't rape that 13 year old.
They consented.

 

[Fogdog]

No. It lacks information.


When a peaceful person capable of consenting to using their own body is forcibly prevented from doing so, is that your definition of molestation?

Also what other consenting people do, is not my business, even if I don't agree with the things they do. Is it your business to intervene in what other do if you are not involved?

If your 13 year old daughter were the one involved with a 21 year old man, would it still be none of your business?

What information do you need in order to decide it the child gave consent, assuming they already told you they had agreed to the act?

 

[Fogdog]

Is it your business to intervene in what other do if you are not involved?

Absolutely its my business if I find out about child abuse. I would immediately take lawful action if I found out that an adult was having sex with a 13 year old. Same goes with spousal abuse, spraying pesticides in an unlawful and unsafe manner, drunk driving and a whole host of reckless behavior that might not have directly harmed me but harmed others. I've turned in poachers before too. How could you look the other way when somebody is recklessly doing harm to others? Is that what your great society would be like?

 

[Harrekin]

Lack of capitalism...

 

[ChesusRice]

Lack of capitalism...

I think that is an example of an unhindered free market

 

[Harrekin]

I think that is an example of an unhindered free market

Nope, it's an example of a shitload of available labour but no capitalists to hire them.

If labour builds everything and carries the Capitalists on their backs, why the fuck can't they do it by themselves?

 

[The_Herban_Legend]

Absolutely its my business if I find out about child abuse. I would immediately take lawful action if I found out that an adult was having sex with a 13 year old. Same goes with spousal abuse, spraying pesticides in an unlawful and unsafe manner, drunk driving and a whole host of reckless behavior that might not have directly harmed me but harmed others. I've turned in poachers before too. How could you look the other way when somebody is recklessly doing harm to others? Is that what your great society would be like?

 

[ChesusRice]

Nope, it's an example of a shitload of available labour but no capitalists to hire them.

If labour builds everything and carries the Capitalists on their backs, why the fuck can't they do it by themselves?

They have been deemed unprofitable. No capitalists would even try