The $100k Global Warming Challenge

Bugeye

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
OddBall1st said:
The issue brought up is never discussed for a reason, Where were those surface measurements made ?
Click to expand...
Personally, I'm more comfortable with the satellite data quality.
Padawanbater2 said:
I don't think you represent the general sentiment of the "hiatus" theory... Most conservatives have jumped on that 18 years to prove anthropogenic climate change doesn't exist at all.

There's nothing wrong with wondering why warming has slowed in a scientific context so long as you understand warming has slowed before, in exactly the same way, and then picked back up again a few years later - as will most likey happen to the current data trend
Click to expand...
I'm not speaking for anyone but myself. I believe AGW is real and likely not going to be catastrophic.
 
G

god1

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
actually, i am just quoting NASA's science back to you. you are the one claiming NASA is engaged in a conspiracy to steal your monies.

ya know, the same theory david duke espouses.
Click to expand...

I'm guessing you wouldn't know science if it hit you between the eyes; btw, I wasn't speaking to you, merely commenting on your gullibility. It goes along with your poor reading comprehension skills.

But since you're so in to NASA science why don't you explain Hansen's CO2 feedback/amplification function in terms of a closed loop block diagram?

Maybe you can answer another question, why is there no published empirical data of the prototypes based on these simulated systems?
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Bugeye said:
Personally, I'm more comfortable with the satellite data quality.

I'm not speaking for anyone but myself. I believe AGW is real and likely not going to be catastrophic.
Click to expand...
I guess it depends on how you define 'catastrophic' for me to be able to make a judgment on that claim. It's good you accept it as real though, that's a big step many conservatives can't seem to take
 
OddBall1st

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
I guess it depends on how you define 'catastrophic' for me to be able to make a judgment on that claim. It's good you accept it as real though, that's a big step many conservatives can't seem to take
Click to expand...

Well it`s been defined as more a security threat than war.
 
OddBall1st

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
For a strange reason, all the studies being conducted are in the USA, but Global warming has yet to visit the USA.
 
bravedave

bravedave

Well-Known Member
Bugeye said:
I just paired a talisker single malt with a Flor de las Antilles. The co2 emissions were splendid. You smoke any good sticks lately?
Click to expand...
Ha. Just picked up a bottle of Glenlivet 12 and some Maker's Mark to get me through the holidays. Working through on sale Graycliff Maduro's. Not bad but would nit pay retail. :)
 
bravedave

bravedave

Well-Known Member
Not GOP said:
NASA confirms that burning fossil fuels COOLS the planet

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/628524/Climate-change-shock-Burning-fossil-fuels-COOLs-planet-says-NASA
Click to expand...
Damn NASA!!! Didn't they also just determine that the southern ice cap actually did grow larger also?? Damn them.
Ya know, I wonder if the NASA collective puts more stock in tracking recent temperature changes using constantly streamed and collected satellite data that covers most all the world and gathered at the atmospheric level that supposedly is the same one the "alarmists" tell us CO2 and that which it amplifies is affected the most OR surface data collected at various places, by various people filtered by various scientists.
 
Last edited:
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Not GOP said:
NASA confirms that burning fossil fuels COOLS the planet

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/628524/Climate-change-shock-Burning-fossil-fuels-COOLs-planet-says-NASA
Click to expand...
Some of my favorite hard-hitting articles from online journalist Jon Austin:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/628569/Judgement-Day-Face-of-Jesus-appeared-in-the-clouds-in-call-for-peace
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/627880/What-is-this-EXTRATERRESTRIAL-craft-snapped-flying-over-the-moon
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/627966/UFOs-caught-camera-NASA-scientists-NOT-explain-away-aliens-space-shuttle
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/627096/Sign-from-God-Divine-intervention-claim-as-mysterious-crosses-appear-over-warzones
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/626119/MOON-LANDINGS-FAKE-Shock-video-Stanley-Kubrick-admit-historic-event-HOAX-NASA
 
Not GOP

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
bravedave said:
Damn NASA!!! Didn't they also just determine that the southern ice cap actually did grow larger also?? Damn them.
Ya know, I wonder if the NASA collective puts more stock in tracking recent temperature changes using constantly streamed and collected satellite data that covers most all the world and gathered at the atmospheric level that supposedly is the same one the "alarmists" tell us CO2 and that which it amplifies is affected the most OR surface data collected at various places, by various people filtered by various scientists.
Click to expand...
NASA better get back to" Muslim outreach" , or else Obama might get pissed and find a way to cut funding.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/07/07/nasas_muslim_outreach_106214.html
 
bravedave

bravedave

Well-Known Member
Lol.
Padawanbater2 said:
Some of my favorite hard-hitting articles from online journalist Jon Austin:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/628569/Judgement-Day-Face-of-Jesus-appeared-in-the-clouds-in-call-for-peace
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/627880/What-is-this-EXTRATERRESTRIAL-craft-snapped-flying-over-the-moon
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/627966/UFOs-caught-camera-NASA-scientists-NOT-explain-away-aliens-space-shuttle
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/627096/Sign-from-God-Divine-intervention-claim-as-mysterious-crosses-appear-over-warzones
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/626119/MOON-LANDINGS-FAKE-Shock-video-Stanley-Kubrick-admit-historic-event-HOAX-NASA
Click to expand...
Do you pull these out when Uncle Puke is using NASA to validate?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
god1 said:
I'm guessing you wouldn't know science if it hit you between the eyes; btw, I wasn't speaking to you
Click to expand...
i don't care if you were speaking to me or not.

you shun NASA in favor of a conspiracy theory espoused by former klan leader david duke, then you accuse me of hating science.

i find that funny, so am compelled to comment on it, and point out what a moron you are.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top