The progressive wing has already beaten the establishment in 2018

Z3r0Z3r0

Well-Known Member
lol i didnt say that it looks like a turd because it looks bad.. I said it looks like a turd because... it actually looks like what I put in the toilet this morning. That's it.. just the visual.. nothing more nothing less.

For example.. if my avi was..


and you said it looked like a water bottle filled with piss and I said it was the best beer in the world.. couldnt we both be right? bongsmilie
Subjetive, I can also say thats a BAD molotov cocktail ;)



I knew it was old school hashish but it did kinda look like a rat poop. A big fat rat like some people here :blsmoke:
YOu means theres rats trolls and shills on the internet!?!?!?! NOO YOUR A TIN FOIL HAT MAN!!!
 
Last edited:

Z3r0Z3r0

Well-Known Member
I agree. My apologies if I came off as a punk.. I was just messing around with you. Hope you have a productive day!
Yeah messin around is trolling and I knew it, no need to call me an idiot. I just get heated with debates when sober towelie mode. Ill get a sack later and chill ;)
 

blowincherrypie

Well-Known Member
Yeah messin around is trolling and I knew it, no need to call me an idiot. I just get heated with debates when sober towelie mode. Ill get a sack later and chill ;)
Trolling is usually malicious no? I wasn't trying 2 b mean. I know ppl dont say it anymore but I was just joshin ya.. not trying to call anybody an idiot ya dig?

edit: Ive never had a real grasp on troll/trolling so I could be completely wrong lol
 

Z3r0Z3r0

Well-Known Member
Trolling is usually malicious no? I wasn't trying 2 b mean. I know ppl dont say it anymore but I was just joshin ya.. not trying to call anybody an idiot ya dig?

edit: Ive never had a real grasp on troll/trolling so I could be completely wrong lol
Many kinds of trolling, to get a rise period could be good or bad or messing around despite you still wanting to toke the tird
 

Z3r0Z3r0

Well-Known Member
I wasn't even trolling, it does look like a piece of shit at first glance. I'd smoke it, but it's not extremely aesthetically pleasing.
Do you expect it to look like a bud of fruity pebbles? Or should it be molded or sculpted to look like Rodins thinker so its more aesthetically pleasing to the eye? Or if I burned a piece of it with hash burn test to see purity would u even realize or know how to tell how pure it is based on smoke and amber color?

Or should I swim to europe and get a pic up close of how it looks? That is the best morrocan hash there is, creme de la creme, it will twist and mold with the heat of your hands
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Do you expect it to look like a bud of fruity pebbles? Or should it be molded or sculpted to look like Rodins thinker so its more aesthetically pleasing to the eye? Or if I burned a piece of it with hash burn test to see purity would u even realize or know how to tell how pure it is based on smoke and amber color?

Or should I swim to europe and get a pic up close of how it looks? That is the best morrocan hash there is, creme de la creme, it will twist and mold with the heat of your hands
I would prefer it to be molded into the shape of something art deco but I am flexible. How long would it take you to swim to Europe?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I hear what you're saying but the prez had to pull the economy out of the toilet and in the process the top 1% was able to capitalize on the real estate bubble bursting and benefit most from the stimulus packages. The alternative would have been a depression instead of recession which would have been good for nobody, but considerably worse for the lower/middle classes.

George W has to take most of the blame for the state of the economy when he left office and most of the massive tax cuts passed last year (even though the economy didn't need any boosting) will benefit that same 1%. Add in the spending package and those moves and consequences are going to be felt for years to come :(
No one has convinced me that there wasn't another, far more equitable way to make it happen.

It was the greatest theft of wealth from the American people in our nation's history, full stop. That it was perpetrated by other Americans with control of the government simply made the heist possible, not any less despicable.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Do you expect it to look like a bud of fruity pebbles? Or should it be molded or sculpted to look like Rodins thinker so its more aesthetically pleasing to the eye? Or if I burned a piece of it with hash burn test to see purity would u even realize or know how to tell how pure it is based on smoke and amber color?

Or should I swim to europe and get a pic up close of how it looks? That is the best morrocan hash there is, creme de la creme, it will twist and mold with the heat of your hands
Lol, you think you can reliably test purity by the color of the smoke?

Hash in Europe is shit, bro, with the exception of Amsterdam.

This is a long established fact, especially the cheap Moroccan shit you can get in Spain or Portugal. It's only bought because it's cheap in comparison to bud.

I've loads of (stoner) friends in Europe and have been there many times myself.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member

Ed Schultz and the smoking gun of Bernie Sanders censorship at MSNBC.
@Padawanbater2
Of course journalists were told not to cover Sanders. IIRC CNN held a couple hour long conference of an empty podium for Trump when Sanders was holding one of his pivotal rallies. CNN, mainstream media at large is culpable for giving Trump millions of dollars worth of coverage during the election just because it boosted their ratings. They held no regard for the damage he could have, and has done, to the country. Ed Schultz is hardly alone in exposing establishment workings in media.

In this clip, he states unabashedly, Phil Griffin, President of MSNBC told him not to cover Sanders. That would be consistent with the earlier reports we cited during the Democratic primary, this pretty much proves it from an insider.

So now we have evidence the media was targeted with not reporting on Sanders, coupled with the fact that we know Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Donna Brazile rigged the Democratic primary for Hillary Clinton by way of changing and limiting Debate schedules, changing voting locations in Sanders heavy districts, and discounting hundreds of thousands of votes in districts that were likely to go to Sanders. Not to mention buying the entire organization years ahead of time to ensure the DNC worked exclusively to elect Clinton over any other Democratic challenger.

Anyone who defends this defends the Trump administration
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Of course journalists were told not to cover Sanders. IIRC CNN held a couple hour long conference of an empty podium for Trump when Sanders was holding one of his pivotal rallies. CNN, mainstream media at large is culpable for giving Trump millions of dollars worth of coverage during the election just because it boosted their ratings. They held no regard for the damage he could have, and has done, to the country. Ed Schultz is hardly alone in exposing establishment workings in media.

In this clip, he states unabashedly, Phil Griffin, President of MSNBC told him not to cover Sanders. That would be consistent with the earlier reports we cited during the Democratic primary, this pretty much proves it from an insider.

So now we have evidence the media was targeted with not reporting on Sanders, coupled with the fact that we know Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Donna Brazile rigged the Democratic primary for Hillary Clinton by way of changing and limiting Debate schedules, changing voting locations in Sanders heavy districts, and discounting hundreds of thousands of votes in districts that were likely to go to Sanders. Not to mention buying the entire organization years ahead of time to ensure the DNC worked exclusively to elect Clinton over any other Democratic challenger.

Anyone who defends this defends the Trump administration
Anyone who believes you is defenseless.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Of course journalists were told not to cover Sanders. IIRC CNN held a couple hour long conference of an empty podium for Trump when Sanders was holding one of his pivotal rallies. CNN, mainstream media at large is culpable for giving Trump millions of dollars worth of coverage during the election just because it boosted their ratings. They held no regard for the damage he could have, and has done, to the country. Ed Schultz is hardly alone in exposing establishment workings in media.

In this clip, he states unabashedly, Phil Griffin, President of MSNBC told him not to cover Sanders. That would be consistent with the earlier reports we cited during the Democratic primary, this pretty much proves it from an insider.

So now we have evidence the media was targeted with not reporting on Sanders, coupled with the fact that we know Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Donna Brazile rigged the Democratic primary for Hillary Clinton by way of changing and limiting Debate schedules, changing voting locations in Sanders heavy districts, and discounting hundreds of thousands of votes in districts that were likely to go to Sanders. Not to mention buying the entire organization years ahead of time to ensure the DNC worked exclusively to elect Clinton over any other Democratic challenger.

Anyone who defends this defends the Trump administration
I saw it myself; I actually held the door open for a CNN camera crew as they left my high school polling place once it became clear they were (not) covering an historic landslide in favor of Mr Sanders.

I didn't fully understand what was going on at the time but it was so strange to this son of a news reporter that I remembered it, knowing I'd seen evidence of something larger than it at first appeared.

Our electoral system has been stolen from We the People and yet the brainwashed among us call us crazy and the overwhelming evidence we present somehow specious.

Classic hallmarks of a propaganda campaign.
 
Last edited:

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I remember when DWS called Phil Griffin personally to tell him Scarborough and Brzezinski were being too tough on her
I'm so happy to see her getting primaries by progressive candidates.

We should expect a ton of (antidemocratic as fuck) dirty tricks.
 

blowincherrypie

Well-Known Member
No one has convinced me that there wasn't another, far more equitable way to make it happen.
I'm sort of confused by this statement? The prez made it possible for unemployment benefits to continue, allowed countless people to get higher education who wouldnt have otherwise been able to, kept people in their homes that would have otherwise been foreclosed, helped struggling small business etc.

Its a fact that the people with the money benefit the most during tough economic times. If you have the means to "buy low" you can make a killing while the rest of us are in the soup line. I'm not saying any of this is right but what "more equitable way" would you have suggested.

Hell I'm still waiting on my reperation check bruh.. I feel you



Chappelle skit for anybody who doesn't know.


edit: I voted for bernie in the primary fyi, i hear a lot of what you say..
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I remember when DWS called Phil Griffin personally to tell him Scarborough and Brzezinski were being too tough on her
Yeah, Bernie's team called and complained a lot too. It was something that every campaign does. Of course Schutlz shouldin't have done that. When asked about it, he said nothing came of it.

This is why you say rigged? There was no effect and Schultz was fired. You are one tender naive little cultist, aren't you?
 

travisw

Well-Known Member

Ed Schultz and the smoking gun of Bernie Sanders censorship at MSNBC.
@Padawanbater2
So if Phil Griffin of MSNBC wouldn't let Ed cover Bernie, how was Bernie able to give his first interview, as a presidential candidate, on his show, on MSNBC in 2015?


Hopefully Ed's new job, at the Russian government sponsored propaganda channel, RT, will allow him to cover him even more effectively this time.
 
Top