Waiting for the next shoe to fall.

PDRCanada

Active Member
Not that I know of.
During the second world war a lot of Canadians were forced to leave
the big cities and to re-establish themselves in smaller towns in rural Canada.
They had to, no one would employ them, they were called names and
beaten by school yard bullies and grown men, Their kind was not wanted
in the country and at that time people didnt care if they lived or died.
They had to work together and because so many of them had parents or grandparents
that couldnt speak or only spoke English with an accent, their native tongue became prevalent
in these towns (why speak english if your family doesnt), and a whole generation of kids
grew up not trusting Canadians even though themselves were second or third generation.
I am the fourth gen, my kids are the 5th. I remember my father telling me he didnt learn
English till he started school, but even in the early mid 50s they were ostracized and kept
together in those small towns they gathered in the early 40s. They married mostly their
own kind and not until myself and my cousins started marrying the "others" did 4 generations
of immigrants start to mingle with the general population again.

It was a sorted and bigoted time in Canadian history, embarrassing enough that no one talks
about what people did to their own kind. At the time only the Japanese were treated worse.
In the sixties when I was growing up I was still taunted with the words the kids used and was
bullied as they told me to go back to my own country, even though my grandparents were born here
in the 1910s.

There were no signs stating "Stay out" or "not allowed" but everybody in the know knew which town was
the enemies strong hold.......Damn Krauts.

So yeah, we had signs in Canada, most of them said "You are now entering...."
 
Last edited:

printer

Well-Known Member
During the second world war a lot of Canadians were forced to leave
the big cities and to re-establish themselves in smaller towns in rural Canada.
They had to, no one would employ them, they were called names and
beaten by school yard bullies and grown men, Their kind was not wanted
in the country and at that time people didnt care if they lived or died.
They had to work together and because so many of them had parents or grandparents
that couldnt speak or only spoke English with an accent, their native tongue became prevalent
in these towns (why speak english if your family doesnt), and a whole generation of kids
grew up not trusting Canadians even though themselves were second or third generation.
I am the fourth gen, my kids are the 5th. I remember my father telling me he didnt learn
English till he started school, but even in the early mid 50s they were ostracized and kept
together in those small towns they gathered in the early 40s. They married mostly their
own kind and not until myself and my cousins started marrying the "others" did 4 generations
of immigrants start to mingle with the general population again.

It was a sorted and bigoted time in Canadian history, embarrassing enough that no one talks
about what people did to their own kind. At the time only the Japanese were treated worse.
In the sixties when I was growing up I was still taunted with the words the kids used and was
bullied as they told me to go back to my own country, even though my grandparents were born here
in the 1910s.

There were no signs stating "Stay out" or "not allowed" but everybody in the know knew which town was
the enemies strong hold.......Damn Krauts.

So yeah, we had signs in Canada, most of them said "You are now entering...."
Oh sure, there was bigotry. But it was not a color thing. But that happened with every set of immigrants all over. The people that were there before seen the others as a threat. I am am an immigrant's son, German decent. But I grew up in the inner city. And most others in the area came over after the war. The nationalities did stick with their own kind a little but that was because most everyone belonged to a church that administered to their flock in their mother tongue. But we all mixed in school and I do not recall any nationality issues then. My buddy brought a friend home from his school, a black guy. I understood his parents were black and that determined his skin color. Other than that he was just a guy, who liked girls, music, cool stuff just like us. No big deal.

We did know which side of the tracks we were on though. Not train tracks but the main street. You went to the same school but the people from the other side of the street were more well off. That was a bit of a divide, although looking back we really were not that different. Moved out to the suburbs when I was 17, I could not believe how naive the kids my age were. But then they led a more suburban sheltered life.

But five years later I was seeing a girl who was from a town an hour away from the city. Went out to meet the family one day, that was interesting. Here city boy is with sis. Kind of got the feeling they were sort of, not quite outcasts but looked down upon. Mind you mom was white and dad an indian (don't call them that now). Only seen the family twice and briefly. But small town gossip painted them as lesser people. I didn't see them as that, or her. Buddies played in a band couple years latter and we routinely played at a bar there.

Yeah, lot of bigotry there. Even against relatives. But that is also what happens with a buttoned down society. Lot of unwanted pregnancies there. Kids driving down the highway drunk and for a thrill turn off the lights. I can see how you could have been treated. My brother in-law came from Mexico. To us he was family. His family were odd. One bother or sister would be jealous of the other. In my family we can not imagine that. My brother is pretty right wing (for Canada), sister left. Each thinks the other might be crazy at times. But we are right there to help the other when needed. My niece's husband has not talked with his brother in decades and probably never will. I don't know how that comes about, totally foreign to me.

Anyway, a piece of Canadian life I guess.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
OAN to air three-hour movie from MyPillow CEO
MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell has released a three-hour documentary about his baseless claims of election fraud, which this week led to an on-air argument between Lindell and anchors on the conservative network Newsmax.

The film, titled "Absolute Proof," will be available on cable television, online and will be streamed for 12 hours on One America News Network.
The conservative channel, which over the last several months aired false claims about the election, is putting a disclaimer on the Lindell film stating that it is paid programing and "opinion only." The liberal group Media Matters noted the disclaimer and the fact that OAN would be airing the movie for 12 consecutive hours.

Can't wait for someone to write an analysis of it. No way I will waste my time watching it.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
The MyPillow guy's 'Absolute Proof' movie is the funniest film of the year
"Absolutely bonkers vanity project that made me laugh so hard I almost choked."
I'm thrilled to report that it does not disappoint — unless you were hoping for actual "absolute proof" of election fraud, in which case, yeah, this whole thing will be deeply disappointing. If, however, you're a normal person whose brain hasn't been irrevocably mutated by the right-wing fever swamp, Lindell's rehash of the various, thoroughly debunked, conspiracies surrounding Donald Trump's decisive electoral defeat is one of the funniest films of the year.

To be perfectly clear, the details of Lindell's — again, absolutely debunked — claims of voter fraud and electronic election-tampering aren't worth going into in the slightest. The less said about the content of his theories, the better. What's important here is the melodramatic way Lindell raises the stakes on this whole thing, calling it a "miracle."
Here's a real quote:
The biggest thing against humanity, and our country, is this attack through these machines. They got ... this opened up ... this revealed, the machines, to where we're at right now.
Evidently, Lindell was so confident in his film that he predicted anything less than massive success would be a sign of the biblical end times in which "we pray and we go to heaven, it's over.

And a quick fact check on the film.

 
Last edited:

CunningCanuk

Well-Known Member
The MyPillow guy's 'Absolute Proof' movie is the funniest film of the year
"Absolutely bonkers vanity project that made me laugh so hard I almost choked."
I'm thrilled to report that it does not disappoint — unless you were hoping for actual "absolute proof" of election fraud, in which case, yeah, this whole thing will be deeply disappointing. If, however, you're a normal person whose brain hasn't been irrevocably mutated by the right-wing fever swamp, Lindell's rehash of the various, thoroughly debunked, conspiracies surrounding Donald Trump's decisive electoral defeat is one of the funniest films of the year.

To be perfectly clear, the details of Lindell's — again, absolutely debunked — claims of voter fraud and electronic election-tampering aren't worth going into in the slightest. The less said about the content of his theories, the better. What's important here is the melodramatic way Lindell raises the stakes on this whole thing, calling it a "miracle."
Here's a real quote:

Evidently, Lindell was so confident in his film that he predicted anything less than massive success would be a sign of the biblical end times in which "we pray and we go to heaven, it's over.

And a quick fact check on the film.

Shit. I’m gonna have to watch it now.

Unless there’s a cost of course.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Could Donald Trump's Gab Post Hint at Return to Social Media?
Former President Donald Trump posted to social media on Friday for the first time in weeks to address his upcoming second impeachment trial in the Senate. The trial starts on February 8. Trump shared a letter from his attorneys to Democratic Congressman Jamie Raskin on his Gab account. Gab is a social media platform popular with some conservatives and supporters of the former president.

The post consisted only of a picture of the letter and no comment was added. The last time Trump posted on Gab, on January 8, was to confirm he wouldn't attend President Joe Biden's inauguration.


Trump's return to Gab comes after reports that the ex-president was still so frustrated by being barred from Twitter that he is writing down insults and trying to get aides to post them from their own accounts.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Could Donald Trump's Gab Post Hint at Return to Social Media?
Former President Donald Trump posted to social media on Friday for the first time in weeks to address his upcoming second impeachment trial in the Senate. The trial starts on February 8. Trump shared a letter from his attorneys to Democratic Congressman Jamie Raskin on his Gab account. Gab is a social media platform popular with some conservatives and supporters of the former president.

The post consisted only of a picture of the letter and no comment was added. The last time Trump posted on Gab, on January 8, was to confirm he wouldn't attend President Joe Biden's inauguration.


Trump's return to Gab comes after reports that the ex-president was still so frustrated by being barred from Twitter that he is writing down insults and trying to get aides to post them from their own accounts.
Trump is so 2020.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
During the second world war a lot of Canadians were forced to leave
the big cities and to re-establish themselves in smaller towns in rural Canada.
They had to, no one would employ them, they were called names and
beaten by school yard bullies and grown men, Their kind was not wanted
in the country and at that time people didnt care if they lived or died.
They had to work together and because so many of them had parents or grandparents
that couldnt speak or only spoke English with an accent, their native tongue became prevalent
in these towns (why speak english if your family doesnt), and a whole generation of kids
grew up not trusting Canadians even though themselves were second or third generation.
I am the fourth gen, my kids are the 5th. I remember my father telling me he didnt learn
English till he started school, but even in the early mid 50s they were ostracized and kept
together in those small towns they gathered in the early 40s. They married mostly their
own kind and not until myself and my cousins started marrying the "others" did 4 generations
of immigrants start to mingle with the general population again.

It was a sorted and bigoted time in Canadian history, embarrassing enough that no one talks
about what people did to their own kind. At the time only the Japanese were treated worse.
In the sixties when I was growing up I was still taunted with the words the kids used and was
bullied as they told me to go back to my own country, even though my grandparents were born here
in the 1910s.

There were no signs stating "Stay out" or "not allowed" but everybody in the know knew which town was
the enemies strong hold.......Damn Krauts.

So yeah, we had signs in Canada, most of them said "You are now entering...."
I'm so sorry for your hardships.

For comparison purposes, tell me. Were there any lynchings?
 

printer

Well-Known Member
The Biggest Trump Financial Mystery? Where He Came Up With the Cash for His Scottish Resorts.
Donald Trump dumped $400 million into his clubs in Aberdeen and Turnberry. Now, lawmakers in Edinburgh want to investigate him for money laundering.

...the self-proclaimed “king of debt” typically takes out large loans to finance the ventures he does bankroll. In this case, Trump’s company proceeded with the development on its own. And it says it paid for everything in cash.

His large expenditures in Scotland were notable because they came during a rocky financial stretch for Trump. The year before purchasing the Aberdeenshire estate, he was ousted as CEO of his thrice-bankrupted casino business; in 2008, he defaulted on a large Deutsche Bank loan tied to a development in Chicago. Like other Trump wagers, his Scottish gamble has so far not worked out. Both resorts are bleeding millions annually.

This February, a group of Scottish Parliament members began making the case that Scotland should use an investigative tool under UK law called an Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO) to scrutinize Trump’s transactions. It can’t be wielded against just anyone; it’s designed to make inquiries into the finances of “politically exposed persons” suspected of money laundering.

A fun read.
 

PDRCanada

Active Member
I'm so sorry for your hardships.

For comparison purposes, tell me. Were there any lynchings?
Dont feel sorry for me, I took the lessons from those bigots and prospered......I mean just look,
here we are talking politics on a weed forum, what could be better?

Lynchings? not that I know of......but we were not a visible minority.
Seems to me most of the lynchings were done by whites to visible minorities......and
not just in the good ol' USA, but a lot of other countries as well.

Kinda like being Canadian..... we blend in with Yanks.......could of sat beside one on the bus today and not know it....
Probably not though......most Canadians drive....
 
Last edited:

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Not that I know of......but we were not a visible minority.
Seems to me most of the lynchings were done by whites to visible minorities......and
not just in the good ol' USA, but a lot of other countries as well.

Kinda like being Canadian..... we blend in with Yanks.......could of sat beside one on the bus today and not know it....
Probably not though......most Canadians drive....
People can behave worse than animals towards each other. We have plenty of examples in the US where each wave of immigration resulted in bigoted attitudes that led to exclusion and mistreatment of the newcomers. Not just immigrants either. In the south, generations of White Trash are treated with lower class status. It's not the same in it's severity or durability when we look at US racism towards people who don't look like Europeans. That said, your own personal experience with bias and prejudice was wrong and I think it's time people bring their own stories forward to be listened to without comment.
 

Bagginski

Well-Known Member
Seems to me most of the lynchings were done by whites to visible minorities......and
not just in the good ol' USA, but a lot of other countries as well.
Looking forward to your corroborating documentation: race-based permanent slavery is an Anglo-American “innovation” that caught on big in Europe after the Confederacy was defeated, but they mostly went to Africa to do it there, rather than go to the trouble and expense of importing “livestock” to Europe; King Leopold of Belgium is particularly infamous for his record of torture and murder in the Congo, Algeria under the French was an oppressive hellhole for Algerians, what the Boers and British did in South Africa is a set of legendary horrors, ditto Zimbabwe...and the Italian occupation of Ethiopia was pretty fucking rank, too.

All big fans of AMERICAN ENSLAVEMENT OF AFRICANS...and of course, there’s Hitler - another big fan of “Confederate economics” who also made a go at building a slave-labor empire in Africa, but they had MUCH more success playing the race card against the Jews back home in Europe (don’t you love how they mostly invaded countries with large Jewish populations? Matters if you’re trying to “build” the Reich with slaves)- the closest they had to an immediately-identifiable pool of potential slave laborers was the Jews...and some of us know how that turned out (though some continue to believe that “those nice Germans” could never have done any of that awful stuff...funny, they’re typically big fans of “Confederate economics, too).

That’s a timeline, BTW. As I say, looking forward to your documentation of cultural oppression in the rest of the world that PREDATES the Barbados sugar plantations, and the importation of African “livestock” to the future USA, and the eruption of the Confederacy.
 
Last edited:

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
All you folks in Michigan, you own this guy! Best make the remainder of his political career a hard one, all politics is local.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michigan Sen. Mike Shirkey Calls U.S. Capitol Attack A Hoax : NPR

Michigan's Top Republican Calls U.S. Capitol Attack A 'Hoax'

Michigan's highest ranking Republican leader was caught on video calling the Jan. 6 attack at the U.S. Capitol a "hoax" and espousing other conspiracy theories related to the siege.

Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey, in a video posted on YouTube of a meeting with Hillsdale County Republican Party officials, said of the Capitol insurrection in which five people died: "It was all staged."

About half an hour into the video Shirkey can also be heard asking, "Why wasn't there more security there?" He accused Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of being involved, saying McConnell "is part of the decision-making how much security they have on stand. I think they wanted to have a mess."

Shirkey on Tuesday issued a statement that didn't directly address his claims but said he regretted the words he chose and his "insensitive comments."

"I said some things in a videoed conversation that are not fitting for the role I am privileged to serve. I own that. I have many flaws," Shirkey said. "Being passionate coupled with an occasional lapse in restraint of tongue are at least two of them."

The Metro Times in Detroit first reported Shirkey's comments, which also included remarks that sexualized Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

The video was posted to the YouTube account of Reclaim Our American Republic last week. The video's description, in part, reads "The Hillsdale County Republican Party has had enough of RINO''s," meaning Republicans in Name Only. "We will continue to flush them out of our local party."

A day after this meeting, the county GOP censured Shirkey for backing a ban on firearms at the state Capitol, according to a press release from the organization.

The organization's secretary, Jon Smith, told CNN that he posted the video, which he surreptitiously recorded, on his personal YouTube page because he didn't trust Shirkey "to be honest with me and I wanted to expose his lies and I might need it to keep it for my own record."
more...
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Other shoes ya mean @Unclebaldrick, since you are dealing with a millipede and there are shoes flying off the beast left and right! Here is a memory from the recent past, the last impeachment of king shit and his acquittal by the senate.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ukraine Releases ‘Shock’ Call With Giuliani As Trump’s Impeachment Trial Begins | Time

Exclusive: Ukraine Releases ‘Shock’ Call With Giuliani As Trump’s Second Impeachment Trial Begins

“Let these investigations go forward,” Rudy Giuliani told the presidential headquarters in Kyiv, Ukraine, his voice turning impatient. “Get someone to investigate this.” On the other end of the line, hunched over a speakerphone, two Ukrainian officials listened in disbelief as Giuliani demanded probes that could help his client, then-President Donald Trump, win another term in office.

The 40-minute call, a transcript of which was obtained by TIME, provides the clearest picture yet of Giuliani’s attempts to pressure the Ukrainians on Trump’s behalf. The President’s personal lawyer toggled between veiled threats—“Be careful,” he warned repeatedly—and promises to help improve Ukraine’s relations with Trump. “My only motive—it isn’t to get anybody in trouble who doesn’t deserve to be in trouble,” Giuliani said. “For our country’s sake and your country’s sake, we [need to] get all these facts straight,” he added. “We fix them and we put it behind us.”

The conversation on July 22, 2019, kicked off the campaign of intimidation that resulted in Trump’s first impeachment. For a year and half, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and his aides said little about their interactions with Giuliani, not wanting to anger an emissary of the U.S. President. But now, as the Trump era ends with a historic second impeachment trial, the Ukrainians have begun to speak up about the circumstances that led to the first. They are also taking steps that could imperil Giuliani and his Ukrainian allies.

Igor Novikov, who served as a close adviser to Zelensky during Trump’s first impeachment, says he is willing to assist an ongoing federal investigation of Giuliani that is reportedly underway in New York, as well as a separate effort to strip Giuliani of his license to practice law. Zelensky’s government has taken legal action against Giuliani’s Ukrainian associates. And they have opened up to the media about the pressure campaign mounted by Trump and his allies. On Feb. 3, Novikov sent TIME a transcript of the Giuliani call, whose accuracy TIME has independently verified.

Giuliani did not respond to a detailed list of questions about the transcript of his call with the Ukrainian officials, the Ukrainian support for his disbarment and the federal investigation.

In a series of interviews, Zelensky’s advisers say their motives are not to get even with Giuliani or merely clarify the historical record. Their goal is to rebuild relations with the U.S. now that President Joe Biden has taken office. “The past is the past,” Zelensky told TIME in a statement on Feb. 4. “I care deeply about the future of our relationship with the United States, so I want to focus on that.”

The Ukrainian moves highlight the raft of fresh threats to Trump and his associates now that he has left office. Under the Constitution, impeachment by the House and a conviction by the Senate are the remedies for presidential misconduct. Trump is now likely to escape conviction for the second time. Yet his critics don’t have to rely on Congress to punish Trump and his allies. They are finding ways to do it themselves: through libel lawsuits, criminal investigations, pressure to ban his social media accounts and other means.

The costs are mounting for Giuliani and his associates, especially the Russian agents and Ukrainian politicians who aided his crusade to get Trump re-elected in 2020. In the final days of Trump’s term, the U.S. government sanctioned seven of these men—all Ukrainian citizens—for being part of a “Russia-linked foreign influence network” that promoted Giuliani’s spurious claims against the Bidens.

Zelensky’s government has launched its own counter-offensive against Giuliani and his enablers in Ukraine. It moved to shut down several Ukrainian media outlets that broadcast unsubstantiated claims of corruption against the Biden family, which Giuliani spent more than a year trying to prove and publicize. One of the Ukrainian lawmakers who helped him, Oleksandr Dubinsky, was kicked out of Zelensky’s political party on Feb. 1.

Potentially more worrying for Giuliani is the Ukrainian support for the investigations he is reportedly facing in New York. Novikov tells TIME that he is providing assistance to a legal campaign to revoke Giuliani’s law license. Novikov is also open to helping the investigation that the former New York City mayor is reportedly facing in the Southern District of New York, the same office where Giuliani made his name as a prosecutor in the 1980s.
more...
 
Top