Herta Muller. The Land of Green Plums.(1996, 31-32)
They were at home intheir fear. The factory and the bodega, the shops and the apartmentblocks, the railway stations and the train rides through fields ofwheat, corn, and sunflowers all were listening. The streetcars, thehospitals and the graveyards. The walls and the ceilings and the opensky. And if it happened , as it often did, that drunkenness grewcareless in places which were lies, it was more like a mistake on thepart of the walls or the ceilings or the open sky, than any intentionof the human brain.
The passage seems toinstil a sense of watchfulness and paranoia with references toeverything 'listening'. The author uses short phrases paused withcommas where many writers would just produce a list. This maybesuggests dis-jointed thoughts with no real flow as observation mustbe maintained and therefore attention is focused externally to thesuppression or inhibition of the internal monologue. The imagery ismainly that of the everyday with mundane places such as factories orflats but the author also uses the Spanish word 'bodega', maybe toflaunt her supposedly forbidden knowledge of an un-obtainableoustide world. This mundane, and normally, non-threatening world isimbued with a sense of danger. Nature cannot be trusted, normallylife giving and sustaining foods such as wheat and corn are alsolistening, sunflowers, historically used in poetry and prose asmetaphors for the happiness of summertime, are all 'listening'. Theauthor breaks writing conventions when starting the 5[SUP]th[/SUP]sentence with the conjunction 'and' as well as her repeated use ofthe words 'and the ' together as opposed to the afore-mentioned listsusually created by inserting commas although she for some reasoninserts a comma after the word corn in the 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] sentence ofthe paragraph. At the end of the paragraph she refers to places 'which were lies', does this mean they only exist in her own head orare they lies in that these places of social gathering, and possiblyfriendliness, are in actuality places of danger. In the final part ofthe paragraph the author seems to blame the environment for theshortcomings of her reality instead of saying it is the fault of theindividual, this may be a reference to her changing perceptions; thatthe human brain is doing nothing wrong and acting naturally but herdeveloping political/social awareness has awoken from its previousstate of dormancy. Her style is of writing is punchy and wandering,no real linear narrative is apparent, as a result it is up to theindividual perception of the reader.
There may bemetaphorical references understandable only to those in her ownethnic/social background. The opening line of the paragraph says 'they were at home in their fear', this could suggest that they werein fear within their homes or that fear was a normal, almostcomfortable, state of being and as such when experienced made themfeel at home because without it they would have felt alone, they hadbecome so inured to it it had actually become part of there 'normal'life and any change would have been even more fearful. Furtherreferences using metaphor were 'places which were lies', maybe this areference to a known attitude about supposed places of 'socialising',that in other cultures would have been places of relaxation andleisure being open and dangerous areas where the government wouldobviously have spies watching .There is also a further reference tothe 'walls or the ceilings', this possibly may be a metaphor similarto the ww2 phrase 'the walls have ears' and could reference possibleelectronic surveilance .It is also possible that living under thepressures of a brutal and strict totalitarian regime may actuallydevelop stress induced mental health issues and the writer is tryingto convey the normalacy of 'madness. The writers background in poetrymay also account for this regular use of metaphorical imagery as alsothe fact the original was written in a foreign language and thereforecertain translational discrepancies occur.