Search results

But they weren't, hence why we have the SSA.

A very sound elementary policy is not to placate bigots, especially when they're as insignificant as Fiji. My word, what a spineless POS Clinton was and is.

I suppose this also applies to women, as they're viewed as inferior in much of the developing world too.

When you throw the quote into Google you get four pages of right-wing blogs that reproduce the quote, yet there's no indication that he actually said it. My guess is that it's as phony as your 'spirit guides'.

When and where did he say this?

Guevara was a run-of-the-mill Marxist-Leninist. He was not a theorist; there is no Che-ism. Even foco theory was flushed out by DeBray.

You asked for examples, and I gave them. You said they were generalities and not specific verbiage, so I linked to the phrasing in the context of the amendment itself. Then you started with the Love It or Leave It dumbassery. Frankly, I don't give two shits if you drown. I'm here to debate...

I wasn't being sarcastic. The lack of rigidity is touted by many, mainly pragmatists. Anything else?

Gee, I guess it must've been in a different post then:

Alternative: A constitution with less ambiguity. If you're really expecting me to lay out a detailed societal program here for you, then you're wildly mistaken about my priorities and your importance.

I've already acknowledged that the lack of rigidity is purported to be one its stronger suits as well.

I listed a few examples, which is what should be expected on a weed growing message board. The Second Amendment is just another example of ambiguity.

Very true. It's wild to me how blind faith is taken as a virtue.

Che-ist? :-(

God crafted an uber pair of hand warmers that envelops us all?

Sorry, but both 'due process of law' and 'cruel and unusual punishment' are both 'language examples'. Or are you saying both are narrowly, or even widely, defined by the Constitution? They're not, of course.

Now we're onto jingoistic Love It or Leave It, Foreigner! drivel? I gave the most common criticism of the AC: lack of rigidity. It also happens to be touted as one of its superior qualities too. I'm flat-out being trolled by invalids.

'Due process of law' is clearly an example of ambiguous language in the Fifth Amendment: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia...

I gave examples prior to saying it was common knowledge. You're beyond disingenuous.

I fail to see how my examples of due process of law or cruel and unusual punishment are generalities. Those are specific examples of ambiguities, though not elaborated. I have a sabby cat avatar, yet you still wonder if I have an alternative or am just complaining? :-(