Donald Trump Announces Plan To Eliminate 490,000 Teacher Jobs

bearkat42

Well-Known Member
Donald Trump has an education plan that would obliterate 490,000 teacher jobs, according to the think tank Center for American Progress Action Fund [CAPAF]. His horrendous plan would totally kill off the Department of Education; however, it gets worse.

When the Republican candidate was in Florida earlier this month, he said about the Education Department:

‘There is so much waste.’

But that is not all. He intends to decimate at the Environmental Protection Agency, too. Why? He needs to pay for his “billionaires first” tax plan.

So, what would Trump’s plan do to the Department of Education? According to the CAPAF, eight million low-income students, or the equivalent of New York City’s population, would lose millions in college grants. The nearly half million teaching jobs would disappear; that’s 14 percent of all kindergarten through high school teachers across the country. CAPAF says that killing all those jobs would be the same as:

‘UPS, one of the country’s largest employers, with over 350,000 American workers—going out of business.’

According to the think tank, these would be the actual results of demolishing the Department of Education:

  • ‘8 million students every year would lose Pell grants
  • 490,000 or more teacher positions could be eliminated $1.3 trillion in student loans would be at risk
  • 9 million low-income students would lose $15 billion of Title I funding annually
  • 5 million children and students with disabilities would lose $12.7 billion used every year to ensure that they receive a quality education
  • 750,000 or more students from military families, Native American students, students living in U.S. territories, and students living on federal property or Native American lands would lose $1.1 billion per year for their school
  • 4,000 or more rural school districts would lose more than $175 million used annually to help improve the quality of teaching and learning in many hard-to-staff schools
  • $700 million used by states to support the 5 million English language learners currently in public schools—representing close to 10 percent of all students—would be cut.’
That is what happens when people elect a man with no empathy nor concern for the average citizen. Then, too, the great dumbing down of America creates a malleable population.

http://bipartisanreport.com/2016/10...lan-to-eliminate-490000-teacher-jobs-details/
 
When was department of education created?

Did Americans manage to get educated before its creation?

Where in the constitution is the federal government allowed to manage the education of citizens of the sovereign states?
 
When was department of education created?
Look it up. Google is your friend.
Did Americans manage to get educated before its creation?
Not very many.
Where in the constitution is the federal government allowed to manage the education of citizens of the sovereign states?
You're right. That's probably why the self proclaimed "greatest country in the world" ranks 14th in education, and 24th in literacy. I wonder where they'd rank without the federal government "managing the education of citizens of the sovereign states".
 
We ranked at the very top before DoE was created.

The US rose to become the wealthiest nation in history before DoE.

It's clear that the loss of DoE is an impending disaster. To a few deep thinkers.
 
We ranked at the very top before DoE was created.
Why U.S. can’t get back to head of the class (because it was never there)

Policy makers and politicians like to talk about “restoring America’s leadership” in education. Our high school students rank low when tested in math and science compared with their counterparts in other countries, but, they say, we can move our students back into the top ranks with effective reforms.

Education Secretary Arne Duncan frequently gives speech about restoring America’s leadership in education. Not to be outdone, the subtitle of the Romney education policy statement is “Mitt Romney’s plan for restoring the promise of American education.”

The slogan of the ExxonMobil National Math and Science Initiative is “Let’s get back to the head of the class.”

To be sure, effective educational reforms can significantly improve the academic performance of American students. But the idea that the United States once was a world leader in elementary and secondary education, while a compelling part of our belief system, is false. We never ranked #1. We can’t get back to the head of the class because we never were the head of the class.

In fact, we always have scored at, or near, the bottom of the rankings.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...nal-supremacy/2012/07/02/gJQAwpgAHW_blog.html
 
Leave it to Democrats to celebrate America being at the bottom educational achievement.

If we were always at the bottom of the barrel, and we are still at the bottom of the barrel, then what purpose has DoE served? Just another unconstitutional power grab by the federal government.

Abolish dept of education, along with dept of energy, and HUD, then lower federal income taxes. That would be a good start.
 
Leave it to Democrats to celebrate America being at the bottom educational achievement.

If we were always at the bottom of the barrel, and we are still at the bottom of the barrel, then what purpose has DoE served? Just another unconstitutional power grab by the federal government.

Abolish dept of education, along with dept of energy, and HUD, then lower federal income taxes. That would be a good start.

What we need is for EVERYONE to pay their taxes. Period.

No lobby to write your own Tax Code.

When that happens, we can talk about the elimination of government entities..but it won't, know why? The budget would be balanced..that's why!

Trump is a good example of this..tax credit carryover for 2 decades..makes him a 'good businessman', right? Wrong. If he REALLY felt that way? he'd be strutting it like a peacock.

EDIT: what he could have done if he had any imagination, would have been to display those returns without being asked to, and point to them using himself as the example, of how he is going to revamp the the Tax Code in order to not allow oligarchy ability to leverage, paying their fair share..instead he's scurrying like a rat on the sinking ship of SS Trump. Such a missed opportunity:wall:
 
Last edited:
Leave it to Democrats to celebrate America being at the bottom educational achievement.

If we were always at the bottom of the barrel, and we are still at the bottom of the barrel, then what purpose has DoE served? Just another unconstitutional power grab by the federal government.

Abolish dept of education, along with dept of energy, and HUD, then lower federal income taxes. That would be a good start.

you're clearly just motivated by your worthless ideology rather than the goal of improving education, george.

for example, there was this one time you joined a white supremacy group. then you spent months lying about it.
 
What we need is for EVERYONE to pay their taxes. Period.

and tax laws that you don't need a phD to figure out would be nice too.

i still think a national sales tax would work. could completely eliminate the IRS. illegals pay, poor people pay, rich people pay. only way you don't pay taxes is if you never buy anything.
 
and tax laws that you don't need a phD to figure out would be nice too.

i still think a national sales tax would work. could completely eliminate the IRS. illegals pay, poor people pay, rich people pay. only way you don't pay taxes is if you never buy anything.

no way.

a poor person spends nearly 100% of their income. so they would be paying the national sales tax, say 28%, on nearly 100% of their income. they'd face a 25% income tax.

whereas a wealthy person might only spend about 5-10% of their income in a given year. their tax rate would be 2-3%.

that's regressive and only hurts the poor.
 
no way.

a poor person spends nearly 100% of their income. so they would be paying the national sales tax, say 28%, on nearly 100% of their income. they'd face a 25% income tax.

whereas a wealthy person might only spend about 5-10% of their income in a given year. their tax rate would be 2-3%.

that's regressive and only hurts the poor.

see, that's why i was a liberal arts major, not econ. lol. good points!
 
Is anyone aware of how a budget is prepared???

You start with 'Cash On Hand'..they mistakenly consider revenue that will never be due to loopholes, tax breaks and subsidies.
 
What we need is for EVERYONE to pay their taxes. Period.

No lobby to write your own Tax Code.

When that happens, we can talk about the elimination of government entities..but it won't, know why? The budget would be balanced..that's why!

Trump is a good example of this..tax credit carryover for 2 decades..makes him a 'good businessman', right? Wrong. If he REALLY felt that way? he'd be strutting it like a peacock.

EDIT: what he could have done if he had any imagination, would have been to display those returns without being asked to, and point to them using himself as the example, of how he is going to revamp the the Tax Code in order to not allow oligarchy ability to leverage, paying their fair share..instead he's scurrying like a rat on the sinking ship of SS Trump. Such a missed opportunity:wall:


I agree. Make a flat tax and eliminate the IRS too. I know, I know, that would make it difficult for Obama and Hillary to persecute their political enemies but it would be for the greater good.

Buck, have you made amends with the IRS yet?

happy-old-woman-edited.jpg
 
no way.

a poor person spends nearly 100% of their income. so they would be paying the national sales tax, say 28%, on nearly 100% of their income. they'd face a 25% income tax.

whereas a wealthy person might only spend about 5-10% of their income in a given year. their tax rate would be 2-3%.

that's regressive and only hurts the poor.wait I'm not smart enough to do this kind of math.
Yep
 
Back
Top