Fighting Terror Selectively, Bushs' Way.

medicineman

New Member
Fighting Terror Selectively, Or the Bush government at work
By MARJORIE COHN

Since the 9/11 attacks, the Bush administration has made the "war on terror" the centerpiece of its domestic and foreign policy. Bush cries terror where there is none - as in Iraq and in the communications of ordinary Americans. Meanwhile, he protects the real terrorists in our midst.

Luis Posada Carriles is a Cuban-born terrorist who has accurately been called the Osama bin Laden of the Western hemisphere. He boasted of helping to detonate deadly bombs in Havana hotels 10 years ago. Declassified FBI and CIA documents at the National Security Archive reveal that Posada was the mastermind of a 1976 bombing of a civilian Cuban airplane that killed 73 people. He escaped from a Venezuelan prison where he was being tried for his role in the first in-air bombing of a commercial airliner. Posada then played a central role in the illegal Iran-Contra scandal.

Posada entered the United States in March 2005 using false papers and was charged in El Paso with lying to Immigration and Customs officials. FBI agent Thomas Rice swore in a June 2005 affidavit that "the FBI is unable to rule out the possibility that Posada Carriles poses a threat to the national security of the United States." Yet on April 19, 2007 Posada was released on bail despite being a flight risk.

This stranger-than-fiction story has a logical explanation. Posada has a long history of ties to the U.S. government. He became a CIA agent in 1961. The U.S. government claims his CIA service ended in 1976. But on April 30, Posada filed a motion in federal court declaring that he continued to work for the CIA for more than 25 years. That puts him on the CIA's payroll when he engineered the terrorist airline bombing. In his motion, Posada asserted the right to present evidence of his CIA work as a defense to the perjury charges. The specter of Posada revealing the dirty deeds committed by the CIA when George H.W. Bush was director of the CIA was intolerable to Washington.

The government was caught between a rock and a hard place. There had been intense pressure to try Posada for his terrorist crimes, as required by Security Council resolution 1373 and three international treaties. Resolution 1373, passed in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, mandates that all countries deny safe haven to those who commit terrorist acts, and ensure that they are brought to justice. These provisions of resolution 1373 are mandatory, as they were adopted under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. The treaties require the United States to extradite Posada to Venezuela for trial or try him in U.S. courts for offenses committed abroad. The Department of Justice elected instead to charge him with perjury for lying about how he entered the United States in 2005.

But the government could not take the risk that Posada might sing like a canary. On Tuesday, U.S. District Court Judge Kathleen Cardone dismissed all charges against Posada. In her ruling, Cardone wrote that "the Government engaged in fraud, deceit, and trickery" by using a "routine" immigration interview to investigate possible criminal charges against Posada. But questions about Posada's prior criminal conduct were relevant to the moral character determination at the immigration interview. Posada is not a "routine" guy and his lawyer was present throughout the interview to protect him against self-incrimination. Cardone found the government's tactics "grossly shocking and so outrageous as to violate the universal sense of justice." She then disingenuously claimed, "This Court's concern is not politics; it is the preservation of justice."

It is shocking and outrageous that Luis Posada Carriles, whose crimes rival those of al Qaeda, is now walking free in Miami. And Cardone's decision is deeply political.

Rep. William Delahunt has called for a congressional hearing to examine the U.S. government's role in promoting impunity in the Posada case. Delahunt sent a letter to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales requesting an explanation as to why the Justice Department did not invoke the USA Patriot Act to declare Posada a terrorist and detain him, stating, "The release of Mr. Posada puts into question our commitment to fight terrorism."

That commitment is also belied by the way Washington has dealt with the Cuban Five. These men peacefully infiltrated criminal exile groups in Miami to prevent terrorism against Cuba. The Five turned over the results of their investigation to the FBI. But instead of working with Cuba to fight terrorism, the U.S. government arrested the five Cubans and tried and convicted them of conspiracy-related offenses. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta reversed their convictions, finding they could not receive a fair trial in Miami. In August 2006, a majority of the full circuit rejected the earlier ruling and sent the matter back to the panel where further appeals are pending. The U.S. media has been irresponsibly silent on the case of the Cuban Five and the irregularities of the trial.

The Los Angeles Times, however, showed singular insight on April 20 when it said the release of Posada "exposed Washington to legitimate charges of hypocrisy in the war on terror." The editorial criticized the U.S. for holding men at Guantánamo without due process while releasing Posada. "The U.S. government has done many odd things in 46 years of a largely failed Cuba policy," the Times said, "but letting a notorious terrorist walk stands among the most perverse yet."
 

medicineman

New Member
Hey, at least I admit that Coulter is over the top. *lol*

Vi
So like you always do, I'll ask you to disprove the contents of the article. Are not the busco idiots a bunch of lying scumbag hypocrites for pardoning this devil, while holding men that have done much less in prison for ever?
 

ViRedd

New Member
"Bush cries terror where there is none"

Two snipers picking off citizens at random with hunting rifles. Attempted airport bombing at LAX. Attempted shoe bombing on airliner. Attempted bombing of the Brooklyn Bridge. Ft. Dix. And a few more that I can't think of. Like most Bush haters, she's in denile regarding terrorist attempts on U.S. soil since 9-11.

"Posada entered the United States in March 2005 using false papers and was charged in El Paso with lying to Immigration and Customs officials. FBI agent Thomas Rice swore in a June 2005 affidavit that "the FBI is unable to rule out the possibility that Posada Carriles poses a threat to the national security of the United States."

Here, in her own article she contradicts herself regarding no terrorist threat.

"It is shocking and outrageous that Luis Posada Carriles, whose crimes rival those of al Qaeda, is now walking free in Miami."

This is a gross overstatement. al Qaeda is responsible for the deaths of over 3000 people here in the U.S. and many more in Iraq. How many Americans has Carriles killed in terrorist attacks again?

"The Los Angeles Times, however, showed singular insight on April 20 when it said the release of Posada "exposed Washington to legitimate charges of hypocrisy in the war on terror." The editorial criticized the U.S. for holding men at Guantánamo without due process while releasing Posada. "The U.S. government has done many odd things in 46 years of a largely failed Cuba policy," the Times said, "but letting a notorious terrorist walk stands among the most perverse yet."

The L.A. Times is hardly a credible source in my opinion. They continually rail against the Bush Administration. Their news is so slanted that even those in the middle of the political spectrum can see the bias. That's why the L.A. Times circulation is falling faster than a ton of bricks. Have you ever seen an anti illegal immigration editorial in the Times?

So now you owe me a disection of the next Coulter article I post, OK? :hump:

Vi
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
Nice sharp scalpel, Vi.....
The WOT is one of the few issues on which I like GWB
There have been NO attacks here in US....so far!



Excerpts below from:IBDeditorials.com: Editorials, Political Cartoons, and Polls from Investor's Business Daily: Homeland Security: So Far, So Good


Listening and watching the establishment media, you would think the administration of George W. Bush was an abject failure on national security. Rosie O'Donnell, set to depart ABC's "The View" next month declared that "We've killed more Americans than any terrorist ever did in this war."
When asked in a TV interview earlier this year if the mainstream media were being unfair to the president, Newsweek assistant managing editor Evan Thomas declared: "Well, our job is to bash the president. That's what we do."
It certainly is. But far from being responsible for more American deaths than any terrorist, President Bush will be remembered by history as a leader who pulled off what more than five years ago seemed impossible — no terrorist attacks on U.S. soil since 9/11..........


With a constantly negative media drumbeat, it is no wonder why Bush's approval ratings are so low. Even a Churchill or a Lincoln, faced with today's media, could not have survived as they fought their own wars for their countries' survival.
History, however, will not be unfair to a U.S. president who did so much, so successfully, to keep us safe at home.
 

medicineman

New Member
Nice sharp scalpel, Vi.....
The WOT is one of the few issues on which I like GWB
There have been NO attacks here in US....so far!



Excerpts below from:IBDeditorials.com: Editorials, Political Cartoons, and Polls from Investor's Business Daily: Homeland Security: So Far, So Good


Listening and watching the establishment media, you would think the administration of George W. Bush was an abject failure on national security. Rosie O'Donnell, set to depart ABC's "The View" next month declared that "We've killed more Americans than any terrorist ever did in this war."
When asked in a TV interview earlier this year if the mainstream media were being unfair to the president, Newsweek assistant managing editor Evan Thomas declared: "Well, our job is to bash the president. That's what we do."
It certainly is. But far from being responsible for more American deaths than any terrorist, President Bush will be remembered by history as a leader who pulled off what more than five years ago seemed impossible — no terrorist attacks on U.S. soil since 9/11..........


With a constantly negative media drumbeat, it is no wonder why Bush's approval ratings are so low. Even a Churchill or a Lincoln, faced with today's media, could not have survived as they fought their own wars for their countries' survival.
History, however, will not be unfair to a U.S. president who did so much, so successfully, to keep us safe at home.
Boring right wing rhetoric, so Bush has kept us safe, what a fucking joke. Bush is responsible for the creation of more terrorist minded Muslims than any man in history. His foriegn policy has created the largest recruiting campaign for Al-Queda ever... If there is another al-queda attack on the US and there probably will be, It can be directly tied to the Bush foriegn policy and the unilateral war in Iraq. This lull in the terror attacks is not the genious of the Bush regime, our borders are fucking wide open, you guys need to get your facts straight. Just think, before Bush there was quite a few years without an attack, should we say Clinton kept us safe. The 911 attack happened on Bushs' watch, duhh!
 

ViRedd

New Member
"If there is another al-queda attack on the US and there probably will be..."

Doin' a little "fear mongering" there Med? :hump:

Vi
 

medicineman

New Member
"If there is another al-queda attack on the US and there probably will be..."

Doin' a little "fear mongering" there Med? :hump:

Vi[/quote] You are so childish. I am not afraid, but with all the chaos that Bush has created accross the globe, and with our borders wide open. I'd say probably about august 2008, a false flag attack will be created somewhere in this country and blamed on al-queda. Are you afraid? I say fuck them, unless they hit Nellis AFB in Vegas, I could care less, and if they hit Nellis, no worries, there'll be a big smokin hole in the ground from here to Baker. Maybe a few hundred americans will die, innocent ones at that, what about the hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis that have been killed, maimed and wounded. Are their lives worth anything less? This whole fiasco, Iraq, is Bushs' fault. What ever terror happens on American soil can be directly blamed on him, and the gutless congressmen that let him continue this insanity.
 
Top