moonofalabama's greatest hits

UncleBuck · Apr 7, 2018

But the election also created huge new dangers. People around Trump, including his vice-president, are not sane realist but fairly extreme ideologues. Trump himself isn't. He is, in my estimate, fairly pragmatic.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

nailed it

UncleBuck · Apr 7, 2018

It is bad for economic equality and other important issues in the United States and elsewhere. But would Clinton have been really better on these?

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

well, she wouldn't have passed the same GOP tax scam trump and his cronies did. but facts are not really the forte of moonofalabama

ttystikk · Apr 7, 2018

UncleBuck said:
But the election also created huge new dangers. People around Trump, including his vice-president, are not sane realist but fairly extreme ideologues. Trump himself isn't. He is, in my estimate, fairly pragmatic.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

More disingenuous cherry picking quotes out of context.

Tell us more about how the Palestinians deserve what they're getting.

UncleBuck · Apr 7, 2018

It is astonishing that THE media outlet that did the most to shine lights on Clinton is ignored in any of the main stream after-election reporting. I am talking of Wikileaks and Julian Assange who did their very best, under high personal risk, to report the truth about Clinton's and the DNC's utter corruption. A big thank you to them!

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

another word would be treason but whatevs

ttystikk · Apr 7, 2018

UncleBuck said:
It is bad for economic equality and other important issues in the United States and elsewhere. But would Clinton have been really better on these?

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

well, she wouldn't have passed the same GOP tax scam trump and his cronies did. but facts are not really the forte of moonofalabama

She took hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign funding from the financial industry, so I'm not inclined to believe you.

ttystikk · Apr 7, 2018

UncleBuck said:
It is astonishing that THE media outlet that did the most to shine lights on Clinton is ignored in any of the main stream after-election reporting. I am talking of Wikileaks and Julian Assange who did their very best, under high personal risk, to report the truth about Clinton's and the DNC's utter corruption. A big thank you to them!

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

another word would be treason but whatevs

Lol

Look who just went Republican, folks!

UncleBuck · Apr 7, 2018

With Trump the U.S. would get a president who is a pretty unknown factor but, in my judgment, a less dangerous one to the U.S. and the world than Clinton.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

nailed it

Drowning-Man · Apr 7, 2018

UncleBuck · Apr 7, 2018

Not only is Trump kicking a black family out of its longtime limewashed home, he also ends U.S. government support for the disenfranchised Jihadis in Syria and elsewhere.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

ummmmmmm

ttystikk · Apr 7, 2018

UncleBuck said:
With Trump the U.S. would get a president who is a pretty unknown factor but, in my judgment, a less dangerous one to the U.S. and the world than Clinton.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

nailed it

And so far, so good; the Chump hasn't been able to get much done relative to what a seasoned political operator might accomplish.

I think Mrs Clinton would have started more wars and killed more Innocents by now.

UncleBuck · Apr 7, 2018

My personal impression is that there was more fake news about Trump than about Clinton.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

real insightful analysis here

UncleBuck · Apr 7, 2018

Trump wants security clearances for his children! Of course hardly any the active promoters of such nonsense will put the officiall denials of these lies on top of their pages or mention them at all.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

what great predictive insight

ttystikk · Apr 7, 2018

UncleBuck said:
My personal impression is that there was more fake news about Trump than about Clinton.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

real insightful analysis here

So you'd prefer more fake news about Clinton?

Put down the vodka bottle, already.

UncleBuck · Apr 7, 2018

Trump is a racist and his voters are white supremacists is a fake news claim that is still rolled out on a daily base.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

hard to argue with such wisdom

UncleBuck · Apr 7, 2018

Why not take Trump for what he is? A fast talking salesman, born too rich, but politically a centrist who long supported Democrats and who will simply continue the political path Clinton, Bush and Obama created and walked before him.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

this guy is a prophet

UncleBuck · Apr 7, 2018

On many of his announced policies there will likely be more Democrats in Congress supporting him than Republicans.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

nostradamus move over

ttystikk · Apr 7, 2018

UncleBuck said:
Trump is a racist and his voters are white supremacists is a fake news claim that is still rolled out on a daily base.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

hard to argue with such wisdom

It's a great excuse for Democrats to point the finger at Trump and not do fuck all to actually help their constituent base, isn't it?

ttystikk · Apr 7, 2018

UncleBuck said:
Why not take Trump for what he is? A fast talking salesman, born too rich, but politically a centrist who long supported Democrats and who will simply continue the political path Clinton, Bush and Obama created and walked before him.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

this guy is a prophet

So far, so good.

Though I'd disagree with 'centrist'.

UncleBuck · Apr 7, 2018

Some Rogers trusted dudes at the NSA (or in the Navy cyber arm which Rogers earlier led) hack into the DNC, Podesta emails and the Clinton private email server. An easy job with the tools the NSA provides for its spies. Whoever hacked the emails then pushes what they got to Wikileaks (and DCleaks, another "leak" outlet). Wikileaks publishes what it gets because that is what it usually does. Assange also has various reasons to hate Clinton. She was always very hostile to Wikileaks. She allegedly even mused of killing Assange by a drone strike.

Rogers then accuses Russia of the breach even while the rest of the spying community finds no evidence for such a claim. That is natural to do for a military man who grew up during the cold war and may wish that war (and its budgets) back. It is also a red herring that will never be proven wrong or right unless the original culprit is somehow found.

Next we know - Trump offers Rogers the Clapper job. He would replace the boss that wanted him fired.

Rogers support for the new cold war will also gain him favor with the various weapon industries which will eventually beef up his pension.

Some of the above is speculation. But it would make sense and explain the quite one-sided wave of leaks we saw during this election cycle.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

nailed it so hard. totally not a ridiculous conspiracy theory

ttystikk · Apr 7, 2018

UncleBuck said:
On many of his announced policies there will likely be more Democrats in Congress supporting him than Republicans.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html

nostradamus move over

If Trump had stuck with the policies he announced on the campaign trail, this would have been true.

You ARE quilting from 2016, after all.

Any minute now you'll take a break to go for another fifth of Stoly, eh?

Don't drive drunk.

Try not to post that way, either.

moonofalabama's greatest hits

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member