Insight: Amare Tech Solar Spec LED Panels

monkeychief

Well-Known Member
Do you know the wattage the cobs on the amare are driven at? How about each mono?

Not sure, but they offer a 5-yr bumper to bumper warranty and have been around longer than all of the current premium COB companies.

All the other lights.....which are more efficient also cost less with the 4 cobs...... amare is a buisness build around money not growing.
Yes, about 10% more efficient being under driven, but the lenses add another 50%+, especially at longer distances.

Interesting, they have the one of the lowest MSRP and actual market price, using premium components backed by one of the best warranty with the highest cri and ppfd, yet they're in it for money and not growing. The cost of the XP-G3 they use is the same as a CXB-3590 and much higher than Vero and Citizen. A few of the previously mentioned companies also use generic drivers vs. Meanwell while offering no lenses and veg. option.
 

BM9AGS

Well-Known Member
Yes, about 10% more efficient being under driven, but the lenses add another 50%+, especially at longer distances.

Interesting, they have the one of the lowest MSRP and actual market price, using premium components backed by one of the best warranty with the highest cri and ppfd, yet they're in it for money and not growing. A few of the previously mentioned companies also use generic drivers vs. Meanwell while offering no lenses and veg. option.
Wait wait. Did I just read that lenses add 50%+ when talking about efficiency???? This is pure amare marketing here. Are you hybridway just using another account?!! Gotta be!!
 

BM9AGS

Well-Known Member
BTW lenses have been proven to reduce a lights output...... had to throw science in to your amare advertising scheme. Keep going tho I'd like to hear more. Yes you also said 10% more being under driven?? So what wattage are the cobs and monos ran at? 10%?? Haha this is funny.


If you have absolutely no fucking clue about lighting and the light you're promoting just don't try to help.....it's bad...really bad....
 

SensiPuff

Well-Known Member
Either way, I know the cxb3590 are better. I was just curious if he was using top of the line for the cxb3070 or what
 

BM9AGS

Well-Known Member
Either way, I know the cxb3590 are better. I was just curious if he was using top of the line for the cxb3070 or what
I'm sure he is. His $600 light using 3 3070s would only cost him like $66 in cobs so it would take some serious assholeness to try to stick his buyers even more than what he is already
 

SensiPuff

Well-Known Member
I just recently discovered what the hell a cob led was about a month ago, since then I've been trying like hell to learn more about them. Purchased a timber kit, 250w cxb3590. But I love learning about all the other lights out there. Growing hid I always tried different bulbs. So now switching over its similar with leds.
I impulse bought an se250 to put in my veg tent. Lol
 

Hybridway

Well-Known Member
Wait wait. Did I just read that lenses add 50%+ when talking about efficiency???? This is pure amare marketing here. Are you hybridway just using another account?!! Gotta be!!
50% more light diverted to the canopy. No wasted light. That means it's delivering light to the canopy more efficiently no matter light losses.
You try so hard to put down this company but you just do t know shit. I've documented The light output of Just the monos on the 450. I think it was over 400 @ 3' if I remember correctly. I doubt your cob does that. Not to mention those monos are veg monsters plus cob enhancers that throw high #'s & perfected spectrum.
No matter what you'll talk shit. But you know on your heart of hearts your wrong.
 

SensiPuff

Well-Known Member
Yeah from documented grows I've seen explosive growth under these lights. It's the reason why I bought one. They might not be the most efficient light out there... but I have to agree that the added spectrum must be beneficial. I would like to see a go green light with its plain cxb3070 vs amare se250 with its enhanced spectrum. Side by side.
Is the few bucks on electricity worth an inferior product in the end? I'm not saying it's true cause I have no data to back that up. But I'm just throwing it out there.
Reason why my timber light has mixed spectrum cxbs :)
 

Hybridway

Well-Known Member
Researching those monos 8) I got some work to do.:hump: anyone has some extra inside on those?
Yeah, CREE XP-G3 , some of the most efficient, newest 5w monos available.
Equally as efficient as any CXB cob.
You guys gotta remember too, some of you are arguing over 2% electrical efficiency over other lights while the spectrum increases photosynthetic efficiency by much more then that.
Ask yourselves what matters most in your garden.
I just cut my electric bill in 1/2 w/ Amare compared to my hps. Get equal or higher yeilds & better quality using 1/2 the watts.
Last run when I had harvested my hps & led at the same time, patients were going nuts for the led weed & offering more for it.
Point is MonkeyChief posted the actual prices & components of the competition & Amare. It's not only the best light IMO, but the least expensive. And the most expensive to build, manufactured or DIY To Boot.
Those monos added will Rock 1 extra cob in every way. I betcha they'd outgrow a single cob 3 fold in veg & flower.
BM9AGS is just a hater w/ little to no experience w/ lighting or growing. Coming around here spewing shit info to deture growers from buying the GOAT of grow lights IMO. Pure Baffoonery.
Go watch your buddy grow w/ your Timber & his CLW & leave the facts up to those whom know. Kick rocks hater.
 
Last edited:

NewI

Well-Known Member
Yeah from documented grows I've seen explosive growth under these lights. It's the reason why I bought one. They might not be the most efficient light out there... but I have to agree that the added spectrum must be beneficial. I would like to see a go green light with its plain cxb3070 vs amare se250 with its enhanced spectrum. Side by side.
Is the few bucks on electricity worth an inferior product in the end? I'm not saying it's true cause I have no data to back that up. But I'm just throwing it out there.
Reason why my timber light has mixed spectrum cxbs :)
It us safe to say that you need to have faith. Amare is on top alredy, most peoples don't know it yet...
 

Plant Lobbyist

Well-Known Member
It is almost arguing which is better, a top end ferrari or the local kids modified rice rocket.

If you are a fast and furious fan - the rice rocket wins hands down. This is akin to DiY'ers.

If money isn't an issue - most would go for the ferrari. Just like the guy with tons of cash to burn going through his mid life crisis.

Now the ultra rich will just go out and create a company to build the bleeding edge tech:



Getting back to lights, as long as it grows plants, it is useable. Most of the back and forth over what is better comes across as being silly for the most part. Very similar to debates involving professional sports or other competitions over what team or product is better.
 

daone

Well-Known Member
Yeah, CREE XP-G3 , some of the most efficient, newest 5w monos available.
Equally as efficient as any CXB cob.
You guys gotta remember too, some of you are arguing over 2% electrical efficiency over other lights while the spectrum increases photosynthetic efficiency by much more then that.
Ask yourselves what matters most in your garden.
I just cut my electric bill in 1/2 w/ Amare compared to my hps. Get equal or higher yeilds & better quality using 1/2 the watts.
Last run when I had harvested my hps & led at the same time, patients were going nuts for the led weed & offering more for it.
Point is MonkeyChief posted the actual prices & components of the competition & Amare. It's not only the best light IMO, but the least expensive. And the most expensive to build, manufactured or DIY To Boot.
Those monos added will Rock 1 extra cob in every way. I betcha they'd outgrow a single cob 3 fold in veg & flower.
BM9AGS is just a hater w/ little to no experience w/ lighting or growing. Coming around here spewing shit info to deture growers from buying the GOAT of grow lights IMO. Pure Baffoonery.
Go watch your buddy grow w/ your Timber & his CLW & leave the facts up to those whom know. Kick rocks hater.
CREE XP-G3 I see they have this in full-spectrum as well, I was also doing some research on the new XQ-E Photo Red LED is designed to providing very high levels of growth-promoting light wavelengths.
 

monkeychief

Well-Known Member
Wait wait. Did I just read that lenses add 50%+ when talking about efficiency???? This is pure amare marketing here. Are you hybridway just using another account?!! Gotta be!!
Gee, if it goes from 1200umol to over 2000, it must be a less efficient. Sad... U obviously are not capable of holding an intelligent conversation or debate without making asinine remarks. I guess I'm hybrid now:) Yeah, I'm a hybrid clone u clown:) You are so knowledgeable, yet bought and recommend CLW, a good quality light, but still a blurple spectrum. Good one. All credibility lost.. U know much less than portrayed sir... so please stop pretending you're knowledgeable.

I'm sure he is. His $600 light using 3 3070s would only cost him like $66 in cobs so it would take some serious assholeness to try to stick his buyers even more than what he is already
A lot better. Hell even go green leds (cheap china imported cxb lights) make more PPFD for wattage and $$

Lol. Again, in case you convenient overlooked my previous post of the price per watt comparison. Amare charges less per watt for their Pro4 with 3590 than Going Green running 3070 with Meanwell vs. generic with reflector and lenses. This goes the same with Johnson with Citizen, which cost much less than the 3590's. Fact is they're the lowest actual market price per watt using top-bin CXB3590 and Meanwell. It is, what it is.

According to who and where is the source you are referring to that they make more ppfd/watt? Proof or it's BS and life's too short for it. Oh, you mean this? A 200watter powered by 4 x 3070@50% can outpar a 1000w DE. Look at the corner readings. 400-518umol?:) If you accept this nonsense, especially the corner readings for this light, you have no business recommending anything to anyone. CXB3070 with standard drivers @$3/w and u recommend it over the Amare with 3590 and Meanwell? Pure comedy:) I'm out of this pointless conversation since you have no respect for the truth and reality or just not as knowledgeable as you attempt to pass off. If you're going to bash and bs, at least get your facts straight and make it sound more convincing. Some of us are not as ignorant as you nor blinded by hatred and prejudice. Get your facts straight sir. Enjoy making a gong-show out of riu. Prejudice is usually based on ignorance. Peace!



http://www.gogreenleds.com/store/p37/200W_4_COB_CXB3070_Grow_Light_.html

Going Green 4x4 200w CXB3070.png

http://growershouse.com/blog/best-indoor-grow-light-test/

1000w DE growershouse par test..jpg

Now the ultra rich will just go out and create a company to build the bleeding edge tech:

Interesting.
 
Last edited:
Top