covert vs. covet, i think. but a minor spelling error is not as damning as living in the conspiracy mentality.
I'm kinda like you on the whole conspiracy thing. At one time in my younger days, I was almost convinced that most of that shit was true..............almost. I'll take a stab at explaining what happened with building 7. As we all know, 2 hijacked jumbo jets were flown into tower 1 and 2. Thousands of gallons of burning jet fuel, explosions and the massive amount of energy released from jets colliding with steel and concrete buildings at 500 mph. When the 2 big towers collapsed they rained down burning debris and tons of steel and concrete. Some fairly large chunks hit building 7. It also burned, unchecked for several hours. There were also several emergency generators and several very large diesel tanks in building 7. There was no controlled demo (they wouldn't have had enough time to set up controlled demo anyways). It's that simple. The conspiracy freaks will say, "No steel frame building has ever collapsed from fire alone in the history of steel frame buidings!" This is true, however these buildings didn't collapse from fire alone either. They collapsed from being hit, exploded and burned! Now you know, and knowing is half the battle!
but what about the molten steel and the hot spots weeks after the collapse? what about flight 93 that just "disappeared" into the ground? what about the pentagon?I'm kinda like you on the whole conspiracy thing. At one time in my younger days, I was almost convinced that most of that shit was true..............almost. I'll take a stab at explaining what happened with building 7. As we all know, 2 hijacked jumbo jets were flown into tower 1 and 2. Thousands of gallons of burning jet fuel, explosions and the massive amount of energy released from jets colliding with steel and concrete buildings at 500 mph. When the 2 big towers collapsed they rained down burning debris and tons of steel and concrete. Some fairly large chunks hit building 7. It also burned, unchecked for several hours. There were also several emergency generators and several very large diesel tanks in building 7. There was no controlled demo (they wouldn't have had enough time to set up controlled demo anyways). It's that simple. The conspiracy freaks will say, "No steel frame building has ever collapsed from fire alone in the history of steel frame buidings!" This is true, however these buildings didn't collapse from fire alone either. They collapsed from being hit, exploded and burned! Now you know, and knowing is half the battle!
Check this out: http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
I don't have all the answers when it comes to this stuff. I do know that most of these conspiracy theories have elements of truth to them which is why they are often so compelling and believable. I also know that many conspiracy junkies are really good at ignoring facts that don't support their conspiracies or that disprove them altogether. I don't know what happened in Pennsylvania. Perhaps the plane was shot down, I simply don't know. As for hot spots? Go build yourself a campfire. A really big one and then let it get good and hot and let the red hot embers build up. Let it smolder and cover itself with ash. Sometimes those fires can stay smoldering for days if it doesn't rain or you don't stomp it out. The ash and stuff insulates the hot coals and keeps it going. The rubble pile acted in the same manner as ashes in a campfire, only on a bigger scale. I'm not sure what molten metal you're referring to. As for the Pentagon. I think that one explains itself. I've said it before and I'll say it again. Conspiracies probably exist but 9/11 isn't one of them. Why would some group try to pull something of this magnitude off and with this many deaths? Who stands to benefit and what if they would've been caught? I don't believe anybody had to do it because it was only a matter of time before terrorists pulled something really big off. They hit us in '93 and damn near brought the towers down that time. This time they succeeded. I don't know why they didn't examine all the steel. Perhaps because they knew what had happened and they had thousands of tons of it. I just don't know.
Well, not everyone can be as enlightened and smart as you.
How much time did you spend in lower manhattan right after 9/11? Did you see the rubble pile? How could they have demo'd that building so quickly? It was a strange collapse but buildings seldom fall in a predictable manner even when experts with years of structural engineering experience plan and execute controlled demos. And most of those controlled implosions take months to set up. Either the building was rigged prior to 9/11 or it fell on it's own. Were those planes flown by remote control? I watched the second plane fly into the tower on live tv! Was that special effects? So much of the whole conspiracy thing just doesn't make sense to me. Perhaps it's because I am extremely skeptical. Maybe I'm just stupid. Fact is, I was in NY less than 24 hours after the attacks. I spent almost a month sifting through rubble, looking for survivors and recovering bodies and body parts. I smelled the jet fuel. I saw the smoldering debris with my own eyes! I don't buy into this being anything other than what it was...........a terrorist attack! Are there some things that don't add up? Of course. There always are and always will be. We won't ever have all of our questions answered and perhaps that makes it a moot point. You believe whatever you want to but I will remain skeptical until such time as there is overwhelming evidence to change my mind. 
Ok, you were there AFTER it all happened, please explain to me how that has ANY bearing on what happened 24 hours prior to you getting there? Did your presence make it all real, otherwise it would be a hoax? Demo teams certainly know how their buildings will fall, how else do other buildings 60 feet away escape unscathed if they didn't know what they were doing? A Super sturdy skyscraper able to withstand hurricane winds and airplanes crashing into it does not all of a sudden lose every bit of its tensile strength in one fleeting moment, no matter how much fire there was. Anyway this is all just a hijack of the thread , create a new 911 thread if you want to debate. BTW were you the one who found the terrorists passport laying on the street that was blown clear of the building and was wholly intact? in fact it was in pristine condition after having survived a 500 MPH collision, a large fireball and a 120 story building falling on it?
I never said you said anything, but you are correct diesel fuel does burn and it burns much better than jet fuel ( jet fuel is a super shitty lowest grade form of diesel fuel).
