euthanatos93420
Well-Known Member
Grafting Q #1:
So i've been thinking about 'grafting' and I have this idea that's not really grafting. But it's very much like it. Quintessentially the idea is to force multiple plants to grow together into a fused single plant at the base to create a 'shared root & stalk system'.
Personally I plan to run a bubbleponics in an "X" and "+" grid so each 'plant' in a '4-fuzed' bucket (see what I'm getting at?) maximizes space used for a SCRoG like this:
X+X+
+X+X
X+X+
With each character above representing for plants from seed or clone tied together at the base of the stem forcing them to 'graft' or fuze together into a 'single plant'.
Any cardholder can see what I'm trying to fudge for here.
Think LE would buy it or even notice?
------
Grafting Q#2:
Along the same lines but for an entirely different purpose.
I was thinking of a SoG grafted similarily in a trained 'S2S2S2' (representing a side view) to cause each plant in a row to both use training teqniques used to shorten plants but also fuse them together in such a way that they can all share each
other's root systems.
Would this provide any benefit by allowing more vigorously growing plants to allow those lagging behind to 'leech' off their vigor and keep the SoG growing evenly? it my theory and I intend to test it after I get some seed stock and clones developed. Just looking for some opinions, suggestions, "Hey watch out for (insert warning/known problem here)", etc.
Mostly thinking that the shared lower leaf system will increase potency. by allowing the networked plant system to share production needs.
I also had the thought the plants on the end might gain more simple by less direct sharing and thought about grafting this into a 'circle' instead of a row.
TIA
So i've been thinking about 'grafting' and I have this idea that's not really grafting. But it's very much like it. Quintessentially the idea is to force multiple plants to grow together into a fused single plant at the base to create a 'shared root & stalk system'.
Personally I plan to run a bubbleponics in an "X" and "+" grid so each 'plant' in a '4-fuzed' bucket (see what I'm getting at?) maximizes space used for a SCRoG like this:
X+X+
+X+X
X+X+
With each character above representing for plants from seed or clone tied together at the base of the stem forcing them to 'graft' or fuze together into a 'single plant'.
Any cardholder can see what I'm trying to fudge for here.
Think LE would buy it or even notice?
------
Grafting Q#2:
Along the same lines but for an entirely different purpose.
I was thinking of a SoG grafted similarily in a trained 'S2S2S2' (representing a side view) to cause each plant in a row to both use training teqniques used to shorten plants but also fuse them together in such a way that they can all share each
other's root systems.
Would this provide any benefit by allowing more vigorously growing plants to allow those lagging behind to 'leech' off their vigor and keep the SoG growing evenly? it my theory and I intend to test it after I get some seed stock and clones developed. Just looking for some opinions, suggestions, "Hey watch out for (insert warning/known problem here)", etc.
Mostly thinking that the shared lower leaf system will increase potency. by allowing the networked plant system to share production needs.
I also had the thought the plants on the end might gain more simple by less direct sharing and thought about grafting this into a 'circle' instead of a row.
TIA