Gov shut down

[Flaming Pie]

Gawd... just fuck eachother and get it over with. Get a room so the grown ups can talk about grown up stuff.

 

[UncleBuck]

That's not a lie.

that is indeed a lie.

you have already admitted that no one told you those things, you just assumed them.

a much safer assumption is that you were rejected because you're a better fit for devryU.

you claimed you knew the socio-economic status of the applicant you were rejected in favor of, but you didn't. lie.

you said you knew the skin color of the applicant you were rejected in favor of, but you didn't. lie.

wipe away the tears, grow up, and own up to your lies.

 

[tokeprep]

that is indeed a lie.

you have already admitted that no one told you those things, you just assumed them.

No one had to tell me anything. I looked at the statistics myself. I already told you that, you just chose to ignore it. Typical.

a much safer assumption is that you were rejected because you're a better fit for devryU.

Right.

you claimed you knew the socio-economic status of the applicant you were rejected in favor of, but you didn't. lie.

See point 1. I looked at the stats myself. Why do you keep ignoring that...?

you said you knew the skin color of the applicant you were rejected in favor of, but you didn't. lie.

wipe away the tears, grow up, and own up to your lies.

Ok. Let's try this one more time: I looked at the stats myself.

 

[tokeprep]

Gawd... just fuck eachother and get it over with. Get a room so the grown ups can talk about grown up stuff.

Don't lump me in with Buck. I'm one of the most substantive people here; this is all he can do try and attack me. So be it.

 

[UncleBuck]

No one had to tell me anything. I looked at the statistics myself. I already told you that, you just chose to ignore it. Typical.



Right.



See point 1. I looked at the stats myself. Why do you keep ignoring that...?



Ok. Let's try this one more time: I looked at the stats myself.

you made a very specific statement that you knew the race and SES of the other applicant.

you did not know that, you only looked at stats and made your own assumption.

do i have to draw you a fucking picture?

you lied.

 

[Someacdude]

Don't lump me in with Buck. I'm one of the most substantive people here; this is all he can do try and attack me. So be it.

Sometimes people quote the idiots i have on ignore, it only reminds me of why i put them there.

 

[tokeprep]

you made a very specific statement that you knew the race and SES of the other applicant.

you did not know that, you only looked at stats and made your own assumption.

do i have to draw you a fucking picture?

you lied.

I knew from the stats. There is no "socio-economic diversity" category in college admissions. If you are white or Asian--even with substantially higher test scores, substantially higher GPA, etc.--you can be denied over someone less qualified to be admitted solely on the basis of race, for the sake of "diversity." Period. It is indisputable fact.

I understand that you dislike the fact, presumably because you're a believer in race-based affirmative action, but that's your own problem to deal with.

 

[UncleBuck]

I knew from the stats. There is no "socio-economic diversity" category in college admissions. If you are white or Asian--even with substantially higher test scores, substantially higher GPA, etc.--you can be denied over someone less qualified to be admitted solely on the basis of race, for the sake of "diversity." Period. It is indisputable fact.

I understand that you dislike the fact, presumably because you're a believer in race-based affirmative action, but that's your own problem to deal with.

i'm not discussing affirmative action.

i'm discussing the very specific statement you made, and the fact that it is a lie.

you think you are being substantive, you are not. you are attempting to divert the argument away from your idiotic statement and into a more generalized discussion about affirmative action.

that's called baffling with bullshit, and it is all you have since you clearly can't dazzle anyone with brilliance.

 

[spandy]

I have a ten inch cock.

 

[cannabineer]

Noone should give a shit where anyone went to college.

If you graduated from a top college you wouldn't be wasting time on this forum.

You would be out making bank.

 

[tokeprep]

i'm not discussing affirmative action.

i'm discussing the very specific statement you made, and the fact that it is a lie.

you think you are being substantive, you are not. you are attempting to divert the argument away from your idiotic statement and into a more generalized discussion about affirmative action.

that's called baffling with bullshit, and it is all you have since you clearly can't dazzle anyone with brilliance.

It's not a lie because you call it a lie.

 

[UncleBuck]

It's not a lie because you call it a lie.

you're right, it's a lie because it has no truth value.

it's a lie because you backtracked from the original statement.

it's a lie for many reasons, but not simply because i say it is.

until you post a fucking rejection letter with them telling you the race and socio-economic status of the person you were rejected in favor of, it is a big fat mother fucking lie coated in lie sauce and double stuffed with lie filling.

do you want to have a tutorial on the conditional tense tonight, or perhaps a review of political events from 2004 when you were all of eight years old?

 

[Canna Sylvan]

Don't lump me in with Buck. I'm one of the most substantive people here; this is all he can do try and attack me. So be it.

I'm not the one who's friends with that pinko.

 

[tokeprep]

you're right, it's a lie because it has no truth value.

it's a lie because you backtracked from the original statement.

it's a lie for many reasons, but not simply because i say it is.

until you post a fucking rejection letter with them telling you the race and socio-economic status of the person you were rejected in favor of, it is a big fat mother fucking lie coated in lie sauce and double stuffed with lie filling.

do you want to have a tutorial on the conditional tense tonight, or perhaps a review of political events from 2004 when you were all of eight years old?

I'm not backtracking from anything. I stand behind my statement 100%.

 

[Canna Sylvan]

you're right, it's a lie because it has no truth value.

it's a lie because you backtracked from the original statement.

it's a lie for many reasons, but not simply because i say it is.

until you post a fucking rejection letter with them telling you the race and socio-economic status of the person you were rejected in favor of, it is a big fat mother fucking lie coated in lie sauce and double stuffed with lie filling.

do you want to have a tutorial on the conditional tense tonight, or perhaps a review of political events from 2004 when you were all of eight years old?

If he's the kind of friend you keep, I'd get something better than an axe..

 

[UncleBuck]

I'm not backtracking from anything.

too late, you already did.

I stand behind my statement 100%.

that's fine, go right ahead.

that act will not instill any truth value to your statement.

 

[RyanTheRhino]

Lets just say im part of that 93% of NASA that got cut.


I'M bored out of my mind right now

 

[tokeprep]

too late, you already did.

that's fine, go right ahead.

that act will not instill any truth value to your statement.

I didn't backtrack. Like I said, I stand behind what I said 100%. My conclusion was based on data and that's the end of it.

 

[UncleBuck]

I didn't backtrack. Like I said, I stand behind what I said 100%. My conclusion was based on data and that's the end of it.

your conclusion was based on assumptions and your initial statement was a (very specific) statement of fact.

digging your high heels in won't change any of that, ma'am.

 

[CaptainKB]

Is the DEA considered 'essential'? Might be a nice time to come pick up some weight in California?