2000w HPS Purple Kush Scrog Medical Grow#2

mr.smileyface

Well-Known Member
That is true, but I have heard of people growing all the way through with MH and ssaying they thought they got bigger buds, It just makes sense that if they likt the MH to grow, why not let them have it through the stretch? :weed:
"Bigger" isnt better. Mh produces fluffyer buds. I always notice the hps produces dense rockhard buds. Maybe it was just the lighting but some say the Mh makes them more thc'd
I use the MH untill week 4 then switch to the hps till end all 60 days of my pk
 

#1Raiderfan420

Well-Known Member
"Bigger" isnt better. Mh produces fluffyer buds. I always notice the hps produces dense rockhard buds. Maybe it was just the lighting but some say the Mh makes them more thc'd
I use the MH untill week 4 then switch to the hps till end all 60 days of my pk
I agree with that. I switched after 8 days of mh to the hps this grow. One thing I noticed is that it did slow the stretch. Drastically with the pk. I have a freind right now with one 1k hps and one 1k hps side by side in his room. He said that he will not use the mh again in flower. He is only in week 3 though, but he says the mh side is a foot shorter. I am not concerned at all about the heigth of my plants and am concerned with the bud development. I would say if you had a strain that you wanted to keep shorter, than use the mh in the first part of the flower. As for me I do so much supercropping, topping, fiming, and lsting that I am not too worried about my plants getting too tall. From what I understand the hps is important however in developing the bud sites, which is of the most importance to me.
Maybe some day when I have too much space and time I will do a true side by side :roll:, well probably not. lol I will stick to the hps in flower.
 
Top