Club 315w lec

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
They may look good to your eye. But they aren't designed for it and can't possibly be putting out the correct spectrum or wattage.

You are now suggesting we run an 860 watt bulb designed for a magnetic ballast on a 315 watt square wave ballast.

And I am the one who is wrong here?

You are a dangerously incompetent individual.

Please shut up.
You continue to insist on misrepresenting what I say and I'm sick of it. The square wave ballast I ran the 860W CDM lamp on was a 1000W Bad Ass ballast.

Worked great!

Try harder not to be a jackass. MUCH harder.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Pretty sure I've been told there is a 1000w low frequency to be used with the 860's
i believe i was told it was a philips ballast aswell.
I'm aware of only two 1000W square wave ballasts; the BadAss from Advanced Nutrients and the Horti Platinum. Both are now out of production.

Frankly, if people want more efficient lighting I highly recommend they go with LED. Both COB LED and Quantum Boards are far more efficient, don't wear out and put out better spectrum.

They're only more expensive once, and both the spectrum improvement and improved efficiency pay for themselves.
 

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
You continue to insist on misrepresenting what I say and I'm sick of it. The square wave ballast I ran the 860W CDM lamp on was a 1000W Bad Ass ballast.

Worked great!

Try harder not to be a jackass. MUCH harder.
Yeah I found and posted that earlier. I didn't know it existed because it is not spec' for any particular bulb.

Figures you would be using that mismatched set up.

I thought I told you to shut up. You are not credible. Please just stop.
 

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
I'm aware of only two 1000W square wave ballasts; the BadAss from Advanced Nutrients and the Horti Platinum. Both are now out of production.

Frankly, if people want more efficient lighting I highly recommend they go with LED. Both COB LED and Quantum Boards are far more efficient, don't wear out and put out better spectrum.

They're only more expensive once, and both the spectrum improvement and improved efficiency pay for themselves.
And there is the cob salesman! I knew it was only a matter of time until you had to say it.

The ballasts are out of production because they don't have any bulbs made to match with.

This is Club 315. The university of Utah has proven this bulb to have the best horticultural spectrum.

you are a goof.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Yeah I found and posted that earlier. I didn't know it existed because it is not spec' for any particular bulb.

Figures you would be using that mismatched set up.

I thought I told you to shut up. You are not credible. Please just stop.
You have no authority to tell anyone else here what to do.

Your credibility is lacking; Your very notion of 'mismatched lighting' is itself an indictment of your knowledge base on the subject; you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Such an assertion fairly screams the fact that you don't know Jack about electronics.

The ballast and lamp combination worked just fine for the simple reason that the specifications of each were compatible.

I'm not even sure why you keep this shit up, you've already alienated a whole forum full of people.

Maybe the rest of us aren't the problem?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
And there is the cob salesman! I knew it was only a matter of time until you had to say it.

The ballasts are out of production because they don't have any bulbs made to match with.

This is Club 315. The university of Utah has proven this bulb to have the best horticultural spectrum.

you are a goof.
Hmmmm, I recommended LED lighting because of its superior performance. Plenty of data out there to back that up. For the record, I'm not selling any lighting, COB or otherwise. You know this, you've accused me of it before.

Those ballasts are out of production because they were more expensive to manufacture than high frequency digital square wave ballasts and the makers failed to do an effective job of explaining their advantages. If you had any knowledge of electronics you'd know this.

FAIL on the 'no bulbs to match with'. The Hortilux Platinum ballast came with a Hortilux 1000W HPS lamp included as an incentive to buy the more expensive ballast. Dipshit.

The University of Utah may have evaluated the lamp against other HID lamps and if they found it superior I wouldn't argue with their findings. That said, there's no way it's the best light of all, bar none. Your arguments are simplistic, full of holes, unsupported and generally chickenshit.

You are an uneducated halfwit without basic knowledge about the technology.
 

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
You have no authority to tell anyone else here what to do.

Your credibility is lacking; Your very notion of 'mismatched lighting' is itself an indictment of your knowledge base on the subject; you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Such an assertion fairly screams the fact that you don't know Jack about electronics.

The ballast and lamp combination worked just fine for the simple reason that the specifications of each were compatible.

I'm not even sure why you keep this shit up, you've already alienated a whole forum full of people.

Maybe the rest of us aren't the problem?
I never said anything about "the rest of us". Or "a whole forum full of people". Just you. You are the fraud and you know it or you would leave this alone.

My alerts and likes say different.

But good try looping in the "us" for yourself and your few fans. Does it make your pretend world less lonely?

I have only alienated personally 3 people. One is a rat. One attracts cops and idiots and doesn't listen. And you.

And you started with me on my first day. And only because I challenged your info with actual university links and it hurt your ego.

I still have only challenged and asked for proof of any of your assertions. And you just keep spreading mis-informed opinion.

Post count and years of membership is not earned credibility.

I don't make claims and assertions with no proof. You never stop.
 

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
Hmmmm, I recommended LED lighting because of its superior performance. Plenty of data out there to back that up. For the record, I'm not selling any lighting, COB or otherwise. You know this, you've accused me of it before.

Those ballasts are out of production because they were more expensive to manufacture than high frequency digital square wave ballasts and the makers failed to do an effective job of explaining their advantages. If you had any knowledge of electronics you'd know this.

FAIL on the 'no bulbs to match with'. The Hortilux Platinum ballast came with a Hortilux 1000W HPS lamp included as an incentive to buy the more expensive ballast. Dipshit.

The University of Utah may have evaluated the lamp against other HID lamps and if they found it superior I wouldn't argue with their findings. That said, there's no way it's the best light of all, bar none. Your arguments are simplistic, full of holes, unsupported and generally chickenshit.

You are an uneducated halfwit without basic knowledge about the technology.

I am sorry I made you this upset. But I have posted many times the chart showing cmh superiority in spectrum and usable light for the plants against hid. Flourescent. And led.

Work on your reading comprehension. Then pretend your an electrician or consultant or a seller of commercial lighting like you told everyone when I met you.

There are also memory excercises you can practice.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I am sorry I made you this upset. But I have posted many times the chart showing cmh superiority in spectrum and usable light for the plants against hid. Flourescent. And led.

Work on your reading comprehension. Then pretend your an electrician or consultant or a seller of commercial lighting like you told everyone when I met you.

There are also memory excercises you can practice.
The difference between you and me is that I do research and testing.

In this way I don't need to depend on others, I know what works from first hand experience.

This gives me a thing you lack; 'credibility'.

Cry some more, baby britches.
 

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
The difference between you and me is that I do research and testing.

In this way I don't need to depend on others, I know what works from first hand experience.

This gives me a thing you lack; 'credibility'.

Cry some more, baby britches.
I have told you since the beginning. You have to grow healthy plants to test anything. And you have to be able to repeat your results. You do neither.

And haven't you read the thread your posting on. I have been sharing detailed results here since November. A plant a week to compare.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I have told you since the beginning. You have to grow healthy plants to test anything. And you have to be able to repeat your results. You do neither.

And haven't you read the thread your posting on. I have been sharing detailed results here since November. A plant a week to compare.
Literally thousands of posts to the contrary.

Think what you want: it's clear facts mean nothing to you.

Good day.
 

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
Literally thousands of posts to the contrary.

Think what you want: it's clear facts mean nothing to you.

Good day.
You posted thousands of words. And a couple of pretty unhealthy plant pics toward the end.

You posted for a long time on another site I frequent and also never showed any plants. Just a lot of egotistical claims with no proof of results ever.

I have made no claims of anything. I learn. I practice. I show results. Consistent results.

And I have no agenda but to finish healing Mrs. MMG.

You are a fraud. Just admit it and move on.
 

SUNDOG

Well-Known Member
@ michiganmedgrower and ttystikk, there's two plus pages of you two bitching at one another. This is club 315w, not who knows more or who has the bigger cock. I'm sure everyone here wants to see and talk about big frosty buds growen with 315w's so just chill smoke some herb and let's gets this tread back on track.
 

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
@ michiganmedgrower and ttystikk, there's two plus pages of you two bitching at one another. This is club 315w, not who knows more or who has the bigger cock. I'm sure everyone here wants to see and talk about big frosty buds growen with 315w's so just chill smoke some herb and let's gets this tread back on track.
I will always correct any mis-information I see here. Too many of us have been steered wrong by internet "experts" like @ttystikk.

He literally has no idea what he is talking about and never stops telling everyone about it.

But you are right. It got out of hand.
 

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
A big thank you to GrowersHouse.com for taking care of me so quickly. I mailed out my defective Phantom ballast, and the bulb it wrecked, last Friday. Now, Wednesday of the following week, I already have my new Phantom II ballast and Phillips bulb.
Glad to hear that but I am having the opposite experience at the moment. Hey sent me the wrong tent almost a month ago and I asked for a return label to simply be mailed out to me as I don't have a printer to print the shipping label and live far from town.

I finally called and emailed enough and got the label in the mail 2 days ago. They did not return my emails.

It will be 6 weeks before I see the tent I ordered.

The zipper has been broke on the old one all this time. Very frustrating.

And when I asked them to put a rush on my return and I would pay for the new tent and wait for the credit on the old one.

The manager said no to fast shipping as their "margins" are too tight.

Not happy with this order this time at all.
 
Top