see4
Well-Known Member
Sky, you are as obsessed as CheeseDick was with his "legal to have, illegal to sell" obsession.
Ohhhh sloppy, you so cray-cray
Sky, you are as obsessed as CheeseDick was with his "legal to have, illegal to sell" obsession.
This is categorically false.
Bob and Sue own, Bobby Sue Bakery, they are proprietors and have 5 employees. They are a privately held business that serves to the public. One of their employees is the head chef and he/she makes all the decisions as to what this Bakery will bake with the exception of a few things that Sue wants. That head chef is a major decision stakeholder in the business but the business is privately held.
Head chef decides to fire Bob and Sue. Nothing happens. Bob and Sue decide to fire head chef. Head chef is unemployed.
It is difficult to believe you can be as dumb as you seem. It's an act, right?
Head chef decides to fire Bob and Sue. Nothing happens. Bob and Sue decide to fire head chef. Head chef is unemployed.
It is difficult to believe you can be as dumb as you seem. It's an act, right?
Uhh. What the fuck are you talking about. Seriously. I mean, do you even hear yourself?
I have to ask, did you go to college? If so, which one?
Are you sure that's even beef?Awesome. I'm going to go get a job at taco bell and tell them to stop being so stingy with the beef in my taco
So you joined rollitup just to post this?Awesome. I'm going to go get a job at taco bell and tell them to stop being so stingy with the beef in my taco
So you joined rollitup just to post this?
I'D SAY CLOWN COLLEGE, BUT IT'S MORE LIKELY KLAN COLLEGE.
If something is privately owned, in order to be privately owned the owner(s) would determine the use otherwise the ownership has been usurped and the business has ceased to be "private".
As mentioned already, this is so, so wrong.
I'm not sure I'm following you. Could you elaborate on this please?