Double Dip Recession Is Here!

beardo

Well-Known Member
perhaps you can elaborate for me.

i could use a good laugh.
Their lowering our life expentancy it's a huge elite eugenics thing that has been going on for years universal healthcare is just the latest in this plan, see the georgia guide stones, listen to bill gates.
 

jeff f

New Member
Yesterday gave us the news of a Double Dip in Housing.

I wonder what expert thinks people can buy houses with no-jobs?

So here we go.. Jobs are drying up and we are doing an economic about face.

Too little that is used up too soon but still the upper classes are making more profits and earning more than ever for our recent history.

So while the upper-wealthy classes are making bank you and I are facing a longer deeper and poorer future.

Google for the latest news.

GET THE FUCK OUT A HERE. REALLY, WHO WOULD HAVE THUNK?

you people crack me up.

let me guess before we go any further.....whats needed is govt to step in.

i will now read the rest to see if i am right
 

jeff f

New Member
Yeah, I noticed the double dip in housing...

Without government intervention it wont get better, either.
blahahahahahahahha

right on fucking cue.

seriously, this is too easy.

yes, lets do some high speed rail to improve the housing haha
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
If their plan is to lower Loire expectancy than they are failing miserably. It has been steadily rising world wide.

A scientist who spoke at the TED convention showing stats correlating between size of family and life expectancy. Off this is of NWO is true you'd think condoms would be illegal...
 

mame

Well-Known Member
blahahahahahahahha

right on fucking cue.

seriously, this is too easy.

yes, lets do some high speed rail to improve the housing haha
your pretty narrow-minded to think that generating economic activity in one sector often benefits other sectors. For example, lets say high speed was implemented and profitable or at least solvent... jobs are created by this - maybe someone buys a house (stimulating the housing sector) or a care (auto manufactoring) or maybe they just have more disposable income to spend on nice restaurants (service/food). So, yes High speed rail would help the housing sector.

The best way to deal with housing would be to deal with private debt and unemployment - the important thing is not to try and force a housing recovery by artificially inflating the sector, you'll end up with another bubble. The stable move is to make money more available to people by getting them jobs. If government can produce useful jobs - not building a bridge to nowhere - but a successful high speed rail system can generate a lot of economic activity.

Ofc if it failed, it wouldn't be worth it - but that's why I constantly try to argue that it's important not to just spend but to spend intelligently. stimulus has to be the government investing and not just random spending. The biggest obstacle for the left has always been convincing people that targeted spending is good ... TBH I don't ever expect that to change. Whatever.
 

jeff f

New Member
your pretty narrow-minded to think that generating economic activity in one sector often benefits other sectors. For example, lets say high speed was implemented and profitable or at least solvent... jobs are created by this - maybe someone buys a house (stimulating the housing sector) or a care (auto manufactoring) or maybe they just have more disposable income to spend on nice restaurants (service/food). So, yes High speed rail would help the housing sector.

The best way to deal with housing would be to deal with private debt and unemployment - the important thing is not to try and force a housing recovery by artificially inflating the sector, you'll end up with another bubble. The stable move is to make money more available to people by getting them jobs. If government can produce useful jobs - not building a bridge to nowhere - but a successful high speed rail system can generate a lot of economic activity.

Ofc if it failed, it wouldn't be worth it - but that's why I constantly try to argue that it's important not to just spend but to spend intelligently. stimulus has to be the government investing and not just random spending. The biggest obstacle for the left has always been convincing people that targeted spending is good ... TBH I don't ever expect that to change. Whatever.
not unless by govt, you mean business man. govg only fucks things like this up.

as soon as a rich guy is shown how something will make him a profit, he will invest in it. no profit no chance,

as soon as govt gets involved the process immediately gets sour
simply ask anyone who is in a job where they have to work side by side with inspectors. i will blow you if you find anyone who works with a govt inpector who actually makes making a profit easier or adds to the productivity of any company.
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
your pretty narrow-minded to think that generating economic activity in one sector often benefits other sectors. For example, lets say high speed was implemented and profitable or at least solvent... jobs are created by this - maybe someone buys a house (stimulating the housing sector) or a care (auto manufactoring) or maybe they just have more disposable income to spend on nice restaurants (service/food). So, yes High speed rail would help the housing sector.

The best way to deal with housing would be to deal with private debt and unemployment - the important thing is not to try and force a housing recovery by artificially inflating the sector, you'll end up with another bubble. The stable move is to make money more available to people by getting them jobs. If government can produce useful jobs - not building a bridge to nowhere - but a successful high speed rail system can generate a lot of economic activity.

Ofc if it failed, it wouldn't be worth it - but that's why I constantly try to argue that it's important not to just spend but to spend intelligently. stimulus has to be the government investing and not just random spending. The biggest obstacle for the left has always been convincing people that targeted spending is good ... TBH I don't ever expect that to change. Whatever.
Cutting useless spending by the billions and allowing tax payers to keep this money in their wallets would greatly help in making more money available, as well as easing the load on businesses and allowing them to hire more people/buy more machinery/expand
 

jeff f

New Member
Cutting useless spending by the billions and allowing tax payers to keep this money in their wallets would greatly help in making more money available, as well as easing the load on businesses and allowing them to hire more people/buy more machinery/expand
sync, you are too stupid to know what to spend your money on.

these keynsian fucks are gonna spend it on high speed rail. have ya heard a that cinc? thats the train that goes by once a day, anywhere between 3 and 6, but not always with loads of empty seats. but its cool, it goes about ninety if its not broke.

see sync, see how much better an idea this is as oppossed to what you wanted to do with the money. you probably would have waisted it on a new car cuz you just got a job and need a new car. see how much better the high speed train is?

now dont you feel better sync?
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
If the high speed rail only goes 90, its a huge waste. Amtrak goes 70MPH between Seattle and Chicago every day, don't tell me were gonna spend billions for a measly 20 MPH. Not when jet planes go 600 MPH. High Speed trains need to do 200 MPH +
 

mame

Well-Known Member
idk where you got 90mph Wiki says most high speed trains in service are between 140-220mph and the fastest train clocks in at 360mph.
 

ink the world

Well-Known Member
simply ask anyone who is in a job where they have to work side by side with inspectors. i will blow you if you find anyone who works with a govt inpector who actually makes making a profit easier or adds to the productivity of any company.

OK jeffy, i'm pulling my pants down and hanging to the left just for ya.

I deal w/ government inspectors all the time. And guess what, Im glad to and I think its necessary. In my industry (tattooing) a "shortcut" or "$ saver" can kill someone.
You wanna get tattooed from an uninspected shop or artist? You wanna expose yourself to AIDS, HIV, Hepatitis, MRSA and a bunch of other nasties without knowledge that the person tattooing you is trained in Bloodborne pathogens?

Fuck it right? If you get AIDS from a tattoo, well thats your fault huh? No need for any government oversight there.

How about your doctor, you care if hes actually qualified BEFORE he operates on you, your wife or kids?
How about the food you eat, you enjoy E Coli Jeff? Those damned inspectors ruining someones business by warning the masses of possible death from using their tainted product.


Make sure you use a lot of tongue action, gently cup my nutsack and look my right in the eyes too Jeff, thats how I like it :-)
 

mame

Well-Known Member
OK jeffy, i'm pulling my pants down and hanging to the left just for ya.

I deal w/ government inspectors all the time. And guess what, Im glad to and I think its necessary. In my industry (tattooing) a "shortcut" or "$ saver" can kill someone.
You wanna get tattooed from an uninspected shop or artist? You wanna expose yourself to AIDS, HIV, Hepatitis, MRSA and a bunch of other nasties without knowledge that the person tattooing you is trained in Bloodborne pathogens?

Fuck it right? If you get AIDS from a tattoo, well thats your fault huh? No need for any government oversight there.

How about your doctor, you care if hes actually qualified BEFORE he operates on you, your wife or kids?
How about the food you eat, you enjoy E Coli Jeff? Those damned inspectors ruining someones business by warning the masses of possible death from using their tainted product.


Make sure you use a lot of tongue action, gently cup my nutsack and look my right in the eyes too Jeff, thats how I like it :-)
I've had a couple of experiences with inspectors as well that weren't bad at all. In fact, they were quite quick and painless. Sure, they were only making sure our buildings were to code and we had all of our fire extiguishers and shit up to date - but it definantly didn't feel like an unnecessary exersize.
 

ink the world

Well-Known Member
I've had a couple of experiences with inspectors as well that weren't bad at all. In fact, they were quite quick and painless. Sure, they were only making sure our buildings were to code and we had all of our fire extiguishers and shit up to date - but it definantly didn't feel like an unnecessary exersize.
You wanna know why?
Because you and I arent skirting the laws to make an extra $. We have nothing to hide, im an honest business person. Id be scared of inspection if I, the shop or my artists werent clean and practicing proper disease prevention techniques.

I guess the question for Jeff is what are you hiding at your business Jeff?
Undocumented workers, health and safety violations?
 

mame

Well-Known Member
Which reminds me, Portland City commisioner Randy Leonard shut down the Greek Cusina in Portland a while back. The owner was pissed IDK if he ended up suing like he said he would but his building was a fucking firetrap... It was pretty bad. But no, the owner thinks it's some kind of conspiracy on Leonard's part... The city had been working with the owner damn near the entire existence of the Greek Cusina ( so apparently over two decades) to help him get into compliance but he always got pissy and said it cost too much to fix his shit so it doesn't act like a box of matches being lit on fire... All he had to do was get in compliance with city code...
 

jeff f

New Member
OK jeffy, i'm pulling my pants down and hanging to the left just for ya.

I deal w/ government inspegctors all the time. And guess what, Im glad to and I think its necessary. In my industry (tattooing) a "shortcut" or "$ saver" can kill someone.
You wanna get tattooed from an uninspected shop or artist? You wanna expose yourself to AIDS, HIV, Hepatitis, MRSA and a bunch of other nasties without knowledge that the person tattooing you is trained in Bloodborne pathogens?

Fuck it right? If you get AIDS from a tattoo, well thats your fault huh? No need for any government oversight there.

How about your doctor, you care if hes actually qualified BEFORE he operates on you, your wife or kids?
How about the food you eat, you enjoy E Coli Jeff? Those damned inspectors ruining someones business by warning the masses of possible death from using their tainted product.


Make sure you use a lot of tongue action, gently cup my nutsack and look my right in the eyes too Jeff, thats how I like it :-)
Are you to stupid to clean your equipment?

Do you need someone to hold your hand?

Boy those inspections sure got rid of ecoli.

If you walk into a doctors office are you to stupid to ask for reference?

I guess for stupid people like you, inspection is great.

I am smart enough to know when my fruit is spoiled, or when my tattoo guy is a pig.
 

Ernst

Well-Known Member
Employers pull the rug on the jobs again.


Looks like Unemployment went back up and the jobs went back down.

Oh and I have a question is this a Gay Bath house?

You guys know there are kids here yeah?

Maybe that is the point? To get kids used to the idea of giving a man oral sex?
 

jeff f

New Member
Employers pull the rug on the jobs again.


Looks like Unemployment went back up and the jobs went back down.

Oh and I have a question is this a Gay Bath house?

You guys know there are kids here yeah?

Maybe that is the point? To get kids used to the idea of giving a man oral sex?
sometime you say the most pathetic things.
 

Ernst

Well-Known Member
I'm not part of the "oral sex in crowd" I am sure I am not in sync with the pathos.
 
Top