How so? Explain. Are you at one time not reliant upon others and do you not reciprocate this kindness? Is it not cyclical?
I'm interested in your take. I've honestly never met anyone who's ever espoused an egoist ethic besides some Nietzschean scholar a while ago. Will to power, he was always saying. Will to power.
What's your take?
Will to power?
Not so much, I personally think that society is defined by the voluntary interactions that take place between individuals. It would not do an actor or actress any good to make a movie that doesn't get watched if they expect to get paid, and it doesn't make sense to force people to watch a movie that they don't want to just to give money to actors and actresses.
Government is needed only to keep order and ensure that all transactions are indeed voluntary, whether they be prostitution, purchasing of drugs, or whatever else.
Government collecting taxes to hand out alms for the power is not logical. It leads to the abuse of power, because now people have no control over their wealth. An inventor might be in the middle of using their capital to make some astonishing discovery that makes human life 1,000 times better, when the government takes it and thus the inventor is now reduced to having to seek employ by a corporation to gain access to the resources needed to continue to invent.
Government then makes laws that state that any invention that the inventor invents while at work is the property of their employer.
Taxation slows progress, and destroys charity while slowing the economy and human progress.
Then there's the fact that regulations are always changing. Rule by law means Rule by law, but the United States has turned that around and has made it rule by whim. We can not honestly state that we are a Republic when every 2 - 4 - 6 years a new group of politicians is elected with promises to change society.
That's not Rule by Law, that's Rule by Whim, in a capricious arbitrary fashion that ignores that different people will value different things at different values at different times.
My statement that my world revolves around me doesn't preclude me being charitable to others, it just means that such action should be entirely my choice.
Of course, involuntary charity is not charity, just as involuntary servitude is not the same as voluntary employment (regardless of the wages.) If I force some one to work for me it doesn't matter if I give them an allowance of $1,000/week or $10,000/month , they are still slaves, especially if by law they are prohibited from leaving my employ like serfs, or even worse, I am prohibited from firing them and thus am a slave to them.
The only way society can stand is through voluntary interactions. Anything else is tyrannical, evil, and innoble.